Law / Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka

11 of 12 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 5 in force and 6 not yet in force. As of .

When each starts9 of 11 carry a date, 2 do not. Earlier is before 2015.
Before 2015: 3 instruments (3 in force) earlier 2015: 0 instruments 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 1 instrument (1 in force) ’25 2026: 0 instruments 2027: 4 instruments (4 not yet in force) ’27 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 6
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law 2
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

Privacy law6 instruments, 6 not yet in force

Research summary (218 words)

Sri Lanka's Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022 (PDPA) was certified by the Speaker and amended by the Personal Data Protection (Amendment) Act, No. 22 of 2025, certified . Commencement is phased by Part, on days the Minister appoints by Order published in the Gazette. Part V (the Data Protection Authority itself) came into operation on , and Parts VI, VIII, IX and X on .

The substantive core has not begun: the Order that set for Parts I, II, III and VII was amended on to remove that day, and an Order gazetted on appoints as the day on which sections 2 and 3, Part I (processing of personal data) and Part III (controllers and processors) come into operation. No day has been appointed for Part II (data-subject rights), Part IV (solicited messages) or Part VII (penalties).

So the lawful-basis, special-category, controller/processor, breach-notification, and cross-border-transfer duties described here bind from , and the data-subject-rights and penalty provisions await their own Orders. Biometric data is an express special category, defined technology-neutrally to reach a voice-derived identifier by its own terms even though its illustrative list names only facial images, fingerprint, and iris data.

Breach notification

Personal Data Protection Act, breach notification duties

Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended by Act No. 22 of 2025, s.23official statute text, Parliament of Sri Lanka

Not yet in force. from , in 2 months It starts to bind on .

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 23(1) requires a controller to notify the Authority of a personal data breach, in the form, manner, and within the time rules made under the Act determine. Section 23(2) requires the Authority to set, by rule, the circumstances triggering notice to the Authority, the circumstances triggering notice to the affected data subject, and the form and content of the notification.

The duty to notify the Authority comes into operation on , with the rest of Part III, under an Order gazetted on . The threshold, timeline, and whether the affected individual must be told are deferred entirely to rules made under section 52, which are not located.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Personal Data Protection Act, comprehensive regime and lawful basis

Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended by Act No. 22 of 2025, Schedule I, ss.5, 18(1), 20-25official statute text, Parliament of Sri Lanka

Not yet in force. from , in 2 months It starts to bind on .

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Lawful basis, referenced by s.5 against Schedule I, follows a General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 6 shape: consent, contract necessity, legal obligation, vital interests, a public-interest task, or legitimate interest subject to a balancing test. Controller and processor duties are allocated at ss.20-25, with processors bound by written instructions and sub-processor flow-down duties.

Section 18(1) gives every data subject the right to request review of a decision based solely on automated processing that has created or is likely to create an irreversible and continuous impact on their rights and freedoms, subject to listed exceptions (authorized by law, authorized by the Authority, based on consent, or contract necessity). Section 5 and Part III (sections 20 to 25) come into operation on , the day appointed by an Order gazetted on . That Order does not name Part II, which holds section 18, so section 18 awaits a separate commencement Order.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Personal Data Protection Act, cross-border transfer of personal data

Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended by Act No. 22 of 2025, s.26official text of the Personal Data Protection (Amendment) Act, No. 22 of 2025, Data Protection Authority of Sri Lanka

Not yet in force. from , in 2 months It starts to bind on .

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A controller or processor may engage in cross-border data flows only where it ensures compliance with Part I, Part II and sections 20 to 25, as the case may be (section 26(1), as substituted in 2025). To do so it must adopt the instruments the Authority specifies by directive, binding and enforceable commitments from the recipient in the third country that give the data subject appropriate safeguards and remedies (section 26(2)).

Section 26(3) permits a flow despite subsection (1) where the data subject has explicitly consented after being told of the risks, the transfer is necessary for a contract with the data subject or for pre-contractual steps at the data subject's request, the transfer is necessary for legal claims or for public interest as defined in item (g) of Schedule I, the transfer responds to an emergency threatening life, health or safety, the transfer is only a transit of personal data through Sri Lanka, or another prescribed condition permits it.

A public authority may not engage in cross-border flows of the categories of personal data the Minister prescribes (section 26(4) and (5)). Part III, which holds section 26, comes into operation on under an Order gazetted on .

What it requires

Data subject rights

Personal Data Protection Act, data subject rights

Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended by Act No. 22 of 2025, ss.13-19official statute text, Parliament of Sri Lanka, as amended

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Data subjects have rights of access (s.13), withdrawal of consent and cessation of further processing (s.14), rectification and completion (s.15), erasure (s.16), and (s.18) review of a decision based solely on automated processing. Section 17, amended in 2025, requires the controller to respond in writing within one month of a written request under ss.13-16 or 18, extendable by up to two further months with notice given before the original month expires.

Section 19, also amended in 2025, gives a right of appeal to the Authority against a controller's refusal on any of these grounds, with the Authority empowered to determine lawfulness and to direct compensation under s.35(2)(c). The Order gazetted on names only sections 2 and 3, Part I and Part III, and does not name Part II.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Personal Data Protection Act, Data Protection Authority and penalties

Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended by Act No. 22 of 2025, ss.35, 38official statute text, Parliament of Sri Lanka

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Data Protection Authority (Part V, operative since July 2023, with the Chairman and Board appointed October 2023) is a body corporate that may sue and be sued. Under section 35, on complaint or its own initiative, the Authority may investigate a controller or processor and, after a hearing, direct it to cease non-compliant processing, take corrective action, or pay compensation to an aggrieved person who has suffered harm, loss, or damage.

Failure to comply with a directive triggers a monetary penalty under section 38 of up to Rs 10,000,000 per non-compliance, doubling for each subsequent one, collected by the Authority (net of any compensation payable) and credited to the Consolidated Fund; unpaid penalties are recoverable via the Magistrate Court of Colombo.

No standalone civil right of action was found; the Authority's directive-and-compensation mechanism under section 35(2)(c) is the only individual remedy, and it is regulator-administered rather than a court claim the data subject brings directly. Part V, which holds section 35, came into operation on . The Order gazetted on does not name Part VII, which holds section 38.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Personal Data Protection Act, special categories and biometric data

Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended by Act No. 22 of 2025, s.56, Schedule IIofficial statute text, Parliament of Sri Lanka

Not yet in force. from , in 2 months It starts to bind on .

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Biometric data is defined at s.56 as personal data resulting from specific technical processing relating to the physical, physiological or behavioral characteristics of a natural person, which allow or confirm unique identification, including facial images, dactyloscopic (fingerprint) data, or iris-related data. Biometric data used for unique identification is one of the enumerated special categories of personal data.

Schedule II conditions processing of a special category on the data subject's consent (or a parent or guardian's for a child) unless another written law prohibits it regardless of consent, employment or social-security or defined public-health necessity, emergency necessity, data manifestly made public by the data subject, legal-claims necessity, or public interest under a written law with safeguards.

The operative definition's technology-neutral "physical, physiological or behavioral characteristics" language reaches a voice-derived identifier on its own terms, though the illustrative list names only facial images, fingerprint, and iris data, not voice specifically. Part I (processing of personal data) comes into operation on under an Order gazetted on . The Schedule II conditions apply through section 5, in Part I.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (243 words)

Sri Lanka has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Computer Crime Act, No. 24 of 2007 criminalises unauthorised access, unauthorised modification, and dealing with unlawfully obtained data, with a bare "no lawful authority" test that carries no requirement of circumventing a security measure, so its reach over a public, unauthenticated page is broader on its face than a security-circumvention statute, though no reported Sri Lankan case has tested it against that fact pattern.

The Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003 gives Sri Lanka an American-style fair use defence (section 11), rather than a fair-dealing list, judged by the purpose and character of the use, the nature of the work, the amount used, and the effect on the work's market; the Act has no text-and-data-mining exception distinct from that general test.

A collection or compilation of data is protected under section 7 only where its selection, coordination, or arrangement is itself original, so Sri Lanka confers no sui generis database right for a compilation assembled through investment or effort alone. The Personal Data Protection Act, No. 9 of 2022, as amended, is researched under this corpus's privacy topic and reaches scraped personal data on the same terms described there.

No Sri Lankan statute or reported case addresses the legal weight of a robots.txt directive, an AI-training-specific rule, unfair competition or misappropriation doctrine distinct from these statutes, or the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap term against a scraper.

Computer misuse

Computer Crime Act, unauthorised access, modification and dealing with unlawfully obtained data

Computer Crime Act, No. 24 of 2007, ss. 3-7Official Act text, Parliament of Sri Lanka, Internet Archive capture of the National ICT Agency's copy

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://www.icta.lk/icta-assets/uploads/2016/03/ComputerCrimesActNo24of2007.pdf

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 3 makes it an offence to intentionally secure access to a computer or to information held in it, knowing or having reason to believe there is no lawful authority for that access; section 4 raises the same conduct to a second offence where it is done with intent to commit a further offence.

Neither section requires infringing a security measure or defeating any technical control, so the provision's reach over a public, unauthenticated page turns entirely on whether the accessor had lawful authority, a question no reported Sri Lankan decision has tested against a scraping fact pattern. Section 5 separately criminalises causing a computer to perform a function that the person knows or has reason to believe will result in unauthorised modification or damage.

Section 6 criminalises intentionally causing danger or imminent danger to national security, the national economy, or public order. Section 7 criminalises buying, receiving, retaining, selling, downloading, uploading, copying or otherwise dealing with information known or believed to have been obtained from a computer without lawful authority by another person. The Act's own section 1 defers its commencement to a date the Minister appoints by Gazette Order.

The revised edition of the Laws of Sri Lanka gives as the Act's date of commencement. No notice of the Minister's Order has been located.

What it requires

Copyright and text and data mining (TDM)

Intellectual Property Act, fair use and compilations of data

Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003, ss. 7, 8(c), 11Official Act text, National Intellectual Property Office of Sri Lanka

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 11(1)-(2) gives Sri Lanka an American-style fair use defence: the fair use of a work for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship or research is not an infringement, judged by the purpose and character of the use (including whether it is commercial), the nature of the work, the amount and substantiality of the portion used, and the effect on the potential market for or value of the work.

Section 11(3) provides that the acts of fair use include the circumstances specified in section 12. Section 12(2)(c) excludes reproduction of the whole or a substantial part of a database from the private reproduction that section 12(1) permits. Section 8(c) excludes "news of the day" from copyright protection altogether.

Section 7(1)(b) protects a collection of works or a collection of mere data (a database), in machine-readable or other form, as a work only where the collection is original by reason of the selection, coordination, or arrangement of its contents; the underlying data itself is not protected, and Sri Lanka confers no sui generis database right of the kind that protects a compilation assembled through investment or effort alone regardless of originality.

The Speaker's certificate on the Act is dated 12th November, 2003. Under Article 80(1) of the Constitution, a Bill passed by Parliament becomes law when the certificate of the Speaker is endorsed on it.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (333 words)

Sri Lanka's own national computer emergency response team describes a cybersecurity legal and institutional overhaul as still underway rather than settled.

Sri Lanka CERT's 2024 annual report lists enactment of a Cyber Security Act and establishment of a Cyber Security Authority among that year's planned initiatives, elsewhere naming the same measure the proposed Cyber Security Bill and its prospective body a Cybersecurity Regulatory Authority (CSRA), and its closing message looks toward 2025 by promising to execute on the Act's implementation, without stating the Act's final number, certification date, or citation anywhere in the report.

A systematic read of Parliament of Sri Lanka's published Acts of Parliament, covering the great majority of the 2024 series (Act No. 2 through Act No. 50) together with the neighbouring 2023 and early 2025 acts, found no Act titled a Cyber Security Act. Act No. 44 of 2024, the number carried in some secondary reporting on Sri Lanka's cybersecurity law, is instead the Public Financial Management Act, certified , not a cybersecurity statute.

Close to twenty Act numbers within the 2024 series were not located, so a Cyber Security Act under one of those numbers is not ruled out, and no operative text of such an Act is described.

Separately, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka's own list of directions and circulars for licensed banks names Circular No. 2 of 2025 (), Reporting of Information Technology and Cybersecurity Incidents of Licensed Banks; that Circular and the Central Bank's Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021, which set the banks' regulatory framework on technology risk and cyber resilience, are each filed as a row of their own. No dedicated product-security or connected-device statute was found.

Sri Lanka's data-protection safeguards and breach-notification duties are this jurisdiction's privacy-topic finding, and its Computer Crime Act's unauthorised-access offences are its scraping-topic finding, neither restated here. Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021 bind every licensed commercial bank and licensed specialised bank to a technology risk management and resilience framework.

Sector security regimes

Technology Risk Management and Resilience for Licensed Banks

Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021 (Regulatory Framework on Technology Risk Management and Resilience for Licensed Banks) Directions 1 to 8 and Schedule IText of Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021 issued by the Monetary Board of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021 apply to all licensed banks, including operations conducted through agents and third-party service providers. Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021 are dated . The Monetary Board of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka is empowered to issue Directions to all licensed commercial banks regarding the manner in which any aspect of their business is conducted.

The Monetary Board is empowered to give Directions to licensed specialised banks regarding the manner in which any aspect of their business is conducted. The framework in Schedule I requires a licensed bank to establish an Information Security Committee as the apex management level body responsible for information security and technology resilience.

The framework requires a licensed bank to appoint a Chief Information Security Officer as the executive officer responsible for its information security. The framework requires a Security Operations Center to be operational on a 24 x 7 basis. The framework requires a licensed bank to have an up to date incident response plan approved by its Board of Directors, detailing procedures for incident escalation, remediation, recovery, and communication with internal and external stakeholders.

The framework requires critical information systems to be subjected to penetration tests at least annually. The framework requires a recovery time objective of less than 4 hours for the critical information systems of a domestic systemically important bank and less than 6 hours for those of any other licensed bank. The general deadline for requirements without an extended deadline is 31.12.2022.

Banking Act Directions No. 05 of 2023, dated 08.12.2023, are listed as amendments to Banking Act Directions No. 16 of 2021. Section 80 of the Banking Act makes it an offence for a director, manager, officer or employee of a licensed bank to fail to comply with a direction issued by the Monetary Board under the Act.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Reporting of Information Technology and Cybersecurity Incidents of Licensed Banks

Central Bank of Sri Lanka Circular No. 02 of 2025 (Reporting of Information Technology and Cybersecurity Incidents of Licensed Banks) paragraphs 2 to 5 and Annexes 01 to 03Text of Circular No. 02 of 2025 of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, published by the Central Bank of Sri Lanka

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Circular No. 02 of 2025 of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka is issued to licensed commercial banks and licensed specialised banks. The Circular is dated . The Circular requires licensed banks to report IT and cybersecurity incidents to the Director, Bank Supervision Department, by email. The Circular sets three clocks: an immediate report within 2 hours of detection, a detailed report within 14 days of detection, and a quarterly report within 15 days after the end of each quarter.

The Circular defines a cybersecurity incident as an event that compromises the confidentiality, integrity or availability of a bank’s systems and information. The Circular revokes the Central Bank’s circular of 25.01.2016 on reporting cybersecurity events.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (322 words)

Sri Lanka has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of the Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003 is the only law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Section 12(3) permits, without the copyright owner's authorization, the reproduction of a short part of a published work in the form of a quotation, provided the reproduction is compatible with fair practice, does not exceed the extent justified by its purpose, and is accompanied by an indication of the source and the author's name.

Section 12(6)(b) separately permits, for the purpose of reporting current events, the reproduction and broadcasting or other communication to the public of short excerpts of a work seen or heard in the course of those events, to the extent justified by that purpose, and section 12(6)(a) permits a newspaper, periodical, broadcaster, or other communicator to reproduce an article on current economic, political or religious topics from another newspaper or periodical unless the owner has expressly reserved that right.

Section 8(c) separately excludes "news of the day" from copyright protection altogether, so the bare facts a wire report carries are never protected regardless of the quotation and current-events exceptions. No reported Sri Lankan decision applies any of these provisions to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to an individual quoting or excerpting a published work.

Neighbouring rights under the Act protect performers, producers of sound recordings, and broadcasting organisations, not print or online news publishers, so there is no publisher-side neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates, and no statute or case law addresses whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public or whether framing or inline display changes the answer.

No hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law exists, and the Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.

Snippet reproduction

Intellectual Property Act, quotation and reporting of current events

Intellectual Property Act, No. 36 of 2003, ss. 8(c), 12(3), 12(6)Official Act text, National Intellectual Property Office of Sri Lanka

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Section 12(3) permits, without the copyright owner's authorization, the reproduction of a short part of a published work in the form of a quotation, provided the reproduction is compatible with fair practice, does not exceed the extent justified by its purpose, and is accompanied by an indication of the source and the author's name.

Section 12(6)(a) permits the reproduction, in a newspaper or periodical or by broadcast or other communication to the public, of an article on current economic, political or religious topics published in another newspaper or periodical, unless the copyright owner has expressly reserved that right on the copies or in connection with the broadcast.

Section 12(6)(b) permits, for the purpose of reporting current events, the reproduction and broadcasting or other communication to the public of short excerpts of a work seen or heard in the course of those events, to the extent justified by that purpose. Section 8(c) separately excludes "news of the day" from copyright protection altogether, so the underlying facts of a news report carry no protection independent of these exceptions.

None of these provisions carries a headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from the fair-practice and purpose-justified tests they state, and no reported Sri Lankan decision applies any of them to a systematic news aggregator rather than an individual quoting or excerpting a published work. The Speaker's certificate on the Act is dated 12th November, 2003. Under Article 80(1) of the Constitution, a Bill passed by Parliament becomes law when the certificate of the Speaker is endorsed on it.

What it requires

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Sri Lanka has no binding AI-transparency, AI-risk, AI-training-data, or AI-prohibited-practices statute. The Ministry of Digital Economy's National AI Strategy for Sri Lanka (AI Sri Lanka 2028), published for public consultation in 2024-2025 and developed further through 2026, is a non-binding policy document that sets governance principles such as transparency, accountability, and human oversight without creating an enforceable obligation.

A Cabinet decision of approved the preparation of a bill to liquidate the Information and Communication Technology Agency of Sri Lanka and establish a Digital Economy Authority. On the Cabinet instructed the Legal Draftsman's Department to prepare a digital economy bill for a new institutional framework expected to cover policymaking, technology implementation, regulation and enforcement, with a focus on emerging areas including artificial intelligence.

No bill text has been published or introduced in Parliament.

The Online Safety Act, No. 9 of 2024 regulates the online communication of false and other prohibited statements and, separately, extends Penal Code child sexual abuse and exploitation offences to online communication of them, but its text carries no deepfake-specific, synthetic-content, or AI-generated-content offence, and no other provision of Sri Lankan law located singles out an AI system, an automated decision, or a generative-AI output for a distinct duty.

As of .

Age gating law

Sri Lanka has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.

The Online Safety Act, No. 9 of 2024 establishes an Online Safety Commission and criminalises the online communication of specified false and harmful statements, and its section 21 makes any person who, by means of an online account or online location, commits or aids and abets an act upon a child that constitutes an offence under listed Penal Code provisions (obscene publication relating to children, procuring or hiring children for sexual purposes, sexual exploitation, trafficking, rape, incest, and grave sexual abuse among them) liable to the punishment the Schedule to that Act sets for each such offence.

That section extends existing Penal Code child sexual abuse and exploitation offences to online communication of them; it does not impose an age-verification, age-gating, or minor-access duty on an internet intermediary, a social media platform, an app store, or a device maker, and none of the Act's other provisions does either.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Sri Lanka AI law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka privacy law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka scraping law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka communications law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka content moderation law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka age gating law
  • No current case law for Sri Lanka reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here1 instrument

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Sri Lanka comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

2 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
14 days
Incident notificationsecurity law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Sri Lanka

2 hours14 days

Reporting of Information Technology and Cybersecurity Incidents of Licensed Banks

Central Bank of Sri Lanka Circular No. 02 of 2025 (Reporting of Information Technology and Cybersecurity Incidents of Licensed Banks) paragraphs 2 to 5 and Annexes 01 to 03security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Report an IT or cybersecurity incident to the Director, Bank Supervision Department, at techrisk.bsd@cbsl.lk, copying dbsd@cbsl.lk, in the Annex 01 format within 2 hours of detecting it (paragraph 4, Table 01).

Send the detailed report in the Annex 02 format, with a root cause analysis and the corrective actions taken, within 14 days of detecting the incident; the Annex 02 guidelines say 14 working days (paragraph 4, Table 01, and Annex 02).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.