Law / Denmark

Denmark

All 31 named instruments researched to a stage, across nine of the ten areas of law we track: 28 in force, 1 not yet in force and 2 proposed. As of .

When each starts29 of 31 carry a date, 2 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 3 instruments (3 in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2017: 2 instruments (2 in force) 2018: 7 instruments (7 in force) 2019: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2020: 2 instruments (2 in force) ’20 2021: 2 instruments (2 in force) 2022: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2023: 1 instrument (1 in force) 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 8 instruments (8 in force) 2026: 1 instrument (1 not yet in force) ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law 3
  2. Privacy law 7
  3. Scraping law 3
  4. Cybersecurity law 4
  5. Communications law 4
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law 2
  8. Digital accessibility law 6
  9. Age gating law 1
  10. Reuse law 1

AI law3 instruments, 1 in force, 1 not yet in force, 1 proposed

Research summary (272 words)

The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) applies directly in Denmark and is not restated here as Danish law.

Denmark's own additions include Lov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025, in effect since , which designates Digitaliseringsstyrelsen, Datatilsynet and Domstolsstyrelsen as national competent authorities under the Regulation, splits market-surveillance responsibility for the Article 5 prohibited practices between them, gives those authorities information, inspection and order powers, and makes a violation of Article 5 punishable by a fine, with no monetary ceiling stated in the Danish text and the EU AI Act's Article 99 ceilings applying according to the bill's notes.

A further bill, 2025/1 LSF 111 ('AI-loven'), introduced , would have extended Danish supervisory arrangements to the Regulation's remaining obligations; the Folketing's record lists the bill as lapsed (bortfaldet).

A new bill, 2026/1 LF 3 ('AI-loven'), introduced on by the Minister for Research, Education and Digitalisation, would supplement the Regulation as a whole, with national competent-authority, market-surveillance, registration, incident-reporting, conformity-assessment and penalty provisions, would enter into force on the day after its publication in Lovtidende, and would repeal Lov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025; it is a proposal and not yet law.

A separate bill would add a personality right against unauthorized, realistic digitally generated imitations of a natural person's face, voice and body as a new Ophavsretsloven section 73a: a consultation draft followed a June 2025 political agreement and was published on , and the Minister for Culture introduced the bill in the Folketing as L 49 on , with a planned entry into force of .

AI prohibited practices

Bill L 49 amending the Copyright Act, protection against realistic digitally generated imitations of a natural person's face, voice and body (proposed section 73a)

Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om ophavsret (Beskyttelse af personlige kendetegn m.v. og ændret proces for prøvelse ved… Ophavsretslicensnævnet), 2026/1 LF 49 (L 49), ny § 73 aBill as introduced (lovforslag som fremsat), 2026/1 LF 49, Kulturministeriet (Ministry of Culture), Retsinformation.dk

Proposed. proposed Not law. It binds no one unless it is enacted.

Introduced in the first chamber, dated , as of . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The bill would add a new section 73a to the Danish Copyright Act (ophavsretsloven) barring a realistic digitally generated imitation of a natural person's personal, physical characteristics from being made available to the public without that person's consent.

An exception applies to an imitation that is an expression of caricature, satire, parody, criticism of power, social criticism or similar, unless the imitation is misinformation that could specifically cause serious danger to another person's rights or material interests. The protection would run until 50 years after the imitated person's year of death. The party who makes the imitation available to the public would bear the burden of proving the imitated person's consent.

The Minister for Culture introduced the bill in the Folketing on . The bill would enter into force on . An earlier consultation draft, published on , had planned entry into force on .

What it requires

Lov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025, National Competent Authorities and Article 5 Enforcement

Lov nr. 467 af 14. maj 2025 om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om kunstig intelligens (AI-loven) Folketingets sagsforlob 2024/1 LF 154Lov om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om kunstig intelligens, official text, Retsinformation.dk

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Denmark's supplementary AI Act law designates Digitaliseringsstyrelsen, Datatilsynet and Domstolsstyrelsen as the national competent authorities under Article 70(1) of the EU AI Act.

Digitaliseringsstyrelsen is the notifying authority and central contact point and is the market-surveillance authority for Article 5(1)(a) to (c), (e) and (f) of the prohibited-practices list, which includes the untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage to build a facial-recognition database.

Datatilsynet is the market-surveillance authority for Article 5(1)(d) and (g), covering individual predictive-policing profiling and biometric categorization that infers a protected characteristic. Domstolsstyrelsen covers the courts' own use of AI systems outside their judicial capacity. The authorities may demand information, enter business premises without a court order, run technical inspections of an AI system, publish their decisions, and issue compliance orders or temporary bans.

A violation of Article 5's prohibited practices, giving inaccurate, incomplete or misleading information on request, failing to answer an information demand, obstructing an inspection, or not complying with an order or temporary ban is punishable by a fine, and the limitation period is 5 years.

The law states no monetary ceiling, but the bill's notes on section 10 say the ceilings in Article 99(3) and (5) of the EU AI Act must be respected, which are EUR 35,000,000 or 7 percent of worldwide turnover for an Article 5 violation and EUR 7,500,000 or 1 percent for inaccurate information.

What it requires

AI sector rules

Lov nr. 1322 af 20. november 2025, Credit Agreements Act Section 7 c(9) to (11), Human Intervention in Automated Creditworthiness Assessment

Lov nr. 1322 af 20. november 2025 om ændring af lov om kreditaftaler lov om markedsføring, lov om forbrugslånsvirksomheder og forskellige andre love (Gennemførelse af det reviderede forbrugerkreditdirektiv), § 1, nr. 15 (kreditaftalelovens § 7 c, stk. 9-11)Danish Act No 1322 of , official text, Retsinformation.dk

Not yet in force. from , in 2 weeks It starts to bind on .

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Act No 1322 of implements parts of Directive (EU) 2023/2225 on consumer credit agreements. Where the creditworthiness assessment uses automatic processing of personal data, section 7 c(9) of the Credit Agreements Act, as redrafted by section 1, point 15 of the Act, gives the consumer the right to request and obtain human intervention from the creditor.

That right includes a clear and comprehensible explanation of the assessment, covering the logic and risks of the automatic processing and its significance and effect on the decision, the right to express a view to the creditor, and the right to request a review of the assessment and of the decision to grant credit. Section 7 c(10) requires that the consumer be informed of these rights.

Section 7 c(11) requires the creditor to inform the consumer without delay of a refusal of a credit application and, where relevant, to refer the consumer to easily accessible debt advice services, and in that case also to tell the consumer that the assessment rests on automatic data processing, of the right to a human assessment and of the procedure for contesting the decision.

The Act comes into force on and does not apply to credit agreements concluded before then, apart from the exceptions that section 6 lists.

What it requires

Privacy law7 instruments, 7 in force

Research summary (86 words)

Denmark's private-sector regime is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) plus the Danish Data Protection Act (Databeskyttelsesloven, Act No. 502 of , consolidated as Act No. 289 of ), which supplies Denmark's national derogations and Datatilsynet as supervisory authority.

Denmark's most distinctive feature is its enforcement mechanism: GDPR Recital 151 records that Denmark's legal system does not allow Datatilsynet itself to impose an administrative fine, so a fine is instead set by the Danish courts as a criminal penalty after Datatilsynet refers the case to police.

Breach notification

GDPR Articles 33-34, Breach Notification in Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 33-34Official Journal text, EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A controller must notify Datatilsynet without undue delay, and within 72 hours where feasible, after becoming aware of a personal data breach affecting a person in Denmark, and must notify affected individuals without undue delay where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms. Section 22(1) and (2) of the Databeskyttelsesloven disapply Article 34 where the person's interest in the information must yield to decisive private or public interests.

Under section 22(6), Article 34 does not apply while telling the persons would be assumed to hamper the investigation of criminal offenses, a decision only the police can take.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Danish Data Protection Act (Databeskyttelsesloven)

Lov nr. 502 af 23. maj 2018 om supplerende bestemmelser til forordningen om beskyttelse af fysiske personer i forbindelse med behandling af… personoplysninger og om fri udveksling af sadanne oplysninger (databeskyttelsesloven), consolidated as Act No. 289 of Retsinformation.dk official consolidated text

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Danish Data Protection Act gives the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) domestic effect in Denmark and supplements it with Denmark-specific derogations for matters GDPR leaves to member states.

Section 6(2) and (3) set the digital age of consent at 15 years, section 11 lets a private party process a CPR (civil registration) number only on listed grounds such as the person's consent, section 2(4) applies the Act and the GDPR to every form of television surveillance, and section 3(8) disapplies chapters II to VII and IX of the GDPR to processing carried out solely for journalistic purposes, except Articles 28 and 32.

The age was raised from 13 to 15 by Act No. 1783 of , in force from . Datatilsynet, the Danish Data Protection Agency, enforces it, with the distinctive feature that Denmark cannot itself impose an administrative fine (see the enforcement instrument below).

What it requires

Cross border transfer

GDPR Chapter V, Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Data from Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 44-49Official Journal text, EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Transferring personal data of a person in Denmark outside the European Economic Area requires a European Commission adequacy decision, Standard Contractual Clauses, Binding Corporate Rules, or a narrow Article 49 derogation, backed by the Article 83(5) top fine tier.

Section 31 of the Databeskyttelsesloven lets Datatilsynet, absent an adequacy decision and in special cases, prohibit, restrict or suspend the transfer of special categories of data under General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 9(1) to a third country or international organisation.

What it requires

Data subject rights

GDPR Article 22, Automated Decisions in Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 13(2)(f), 14(2)(g), 15(1)(h) and 22Official Journal text, EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 22 gives a person in Denmark the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects or similarly significantly affects them, unless the decision is necessary for a contract with them, authorised by a law that safeguards their rights, or based on their explicit consent.

Where it rests on a contract or consent, the controller must at least let the person obtain human intervention, express their point of view and contest the decision.

Under Article 22(4), such a decision may not rest on the special categories of personal data in Article 9(1) unless the person gave explicit consent or the processing is necessary for reasons of substantial public interest on the basis of proportionate Union or Member State law, with suitable safeguards in place.

Articles 13(2)(f), 14(2)(g) and 15(1)(h) require the controller to tell the person that such decision-making takes place, with meaningful information about the logic involved and its significance and envisaged consequences for them, at collection, within the Article 14(3) period where the data came from another source, and on an access request.

The Databeskyttelsesloven adds no rule of its own on automated decisions.

What it requires

GDPR Articles 12-21, Data Subject Rights as Applied in Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 12-21; DatabeskyttelseslovenOfficial Journal text, EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Articles 12 to 21 apply directly in Denmark: access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, and objection, generally exercisable against the controller within one month. Section 22(1) of the Databeskyttelsesloven narrows them for a private controller: the information, access and breach-notice duties (Articles 13, 14, 15 and 34) do not apply where the person's interest in the information must yield to decisive private interests, including their own.

Section 22(2) allows the same exception where the person's interest must yield to decisive public interests, such as public security, crime prevention or the enforcement of civil-law claims. Under section 22(5), access, rectification, restriction and objection do not apply to processing solely for scientific or statistical purposes.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

GDPR Articles 82-83 and Datatilsynet Enforcement in Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 82-83Official Journal text, EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Datatilsynet holds the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 58 corrective toolkit directly, warnings, reprimands, compliance orders and processing bans, but GDPR Recital 151 records that Denmark's legal system does not allow the supervisory authority itself to impose an administrative fine.

Where a violation is expected to lead to no more than a fine, section 42 of the Databeskyttelsesloven lets Datatilsynet offer a fine notice (bødeforelæg) that settles the case without trial if the person pleads guilty and pays the stated fine, and acceptance ends the prosecution. GDPR Article 82 gives any person who suffered material or non-material damage a right to compensation from the controller or processor.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

GDPR Article 9, Special Categories of Personal Data as Applied in Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Art. 9Official Journal text, EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2016/679

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 9(1) classifies biometric data processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person as a special category of personal data, prohibited absent an Article 9(2) ground such as explicit consent. The Danish Data Protection Act does not mention biometric data: its section 7 treats every Article 9(1) category alike, so the Act has no list of biometric identifier types and no biometric-specific rule.

What it requires

Scraping law3 instruments, 3 in force

Research summary (278 words)

Denmark has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

Straffeloven (the Criminal Code) section 263 criminalizes unauthorized access to another's data system or to data intended for use in a data system, with no requirement in its text that the offender circumvent a technical security measure, so a plain reading does not exclude access to an unauthenticated public page; no published Danish court decision addressing web scraping of public pages under this section is confirmed in the primary text.

Ophavsretsloven (the Copyright Act) section 71 gives the maker of a catalogue, table, database or similar compilation resulting from a substantial investment an exclusive right against reproduction or making available of the whole or a substantial part, for 15 years, which reaches unauthorized bulk extraction by a scraper regardless of copyright in the underlying content.

Ophavsretsloven sections 11b and 11c, transposing Articles 3 and 4 of the EU Digital Single Market Copyright Directive, let a person with lawful access to a work extract and copy it for text and data mining, including for AI training, unless the rights holder has expressly reserved that use in an appropriate manner, which the bill's remarks treat as ordinarily a machine-readable one, with a separate, non-waivable exception for scientific research by research organizations and cultural heritage institutions.

No Danish statute or reported case establishing a scraping-specific unfair-competition or trespass doctrine is confirmed in the primary text, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive beyond the machine-readable reservation that section 11 b recognizes. Nor is there a reported decision confirming whether website terms available only by hyperlink, never affirmatively accepted, bind a crawler that never transacts on the site.

Computer misuse

Straffeloven Section 263, Unauthorized Access to a Data System

Straffeloven, section 263 (Uberettiget adgang til et datasystem), Lovbekendtgorelse nr. 1294 af 7. november 2025Straffeloven, official consolidated text, Retsinformation.dk

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 263, subsection 1, punishes with a fine or imprisonment of up to 1 year and 6 months whoever unlawfully obtains access to another's data system or to data intended for use in a data system. The provision does not state that the access must defeat a security measure, so its text does not on its face exclude reading a public, unauthenticated page.

Subsection 3 raises the maximum to imprisonment of up to 6 years where the access is made with intent to learn a business's trade secrets or under other especially aggravating circumstances, including systematic or organized offending. A related section, 263a, separately punishes commercial trafficking in access credentials to a data system.

What it requires

Copyright and text and data mining (TDM)

Ophavsretsloven Sections 11b-11c, Text and Data Mining Exception

Ophavsretsloven sections 11 b-11 c (Tekst- og datamining), Lovbekendtgorelse nr. 1093 af 20. august 2023, inserted by Lov nr. 680 af 6. juni 2023Ophavsretsloven, official consolidated text, Retsinformation.dk

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A person with lawful access to a work may extract from it and make copies of it for text and data mining, defined as any automated analytical technique for analysing text and data in digital form to generate information such as patterns, trends and correlations, provided the rights holder has not expressly reserved the use of the work in an appropriate manner, and the resulting copies may be kept as long as needed for the mining.

A separate, non-waivable exception in section 11c lets a research organization or cultural heritage institution with lawful access extract from and copy a work for text and data mining carried out for scientific research, including within a public-private partnership, without the reservation that limits the general exception. Act number 680 of , which inserted these sections, provides that it takes effect on publication in Lovtidende, and it came into force on .

What it requires

Database right

Ophavsretsloven Section 71, Sui Generis Database Right

Ophavsretsloven, section 71 (Fremstillere af kataloger m.v.), Lovbekendtgorelse nr. 1093 af 20. august 2023Ophavsretsloven, official consolidated text, Retsinformation.dk

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Whoever produces a catalogue, table, database or similar compilation in which a large number of items of information are assembled, or which results from a substantial investment, has the exclusive right to control the whole work or a substantial part of it, by reproducing it or by making it available to the public.

The right also reaches a repeated and systematic reproduction or making available of insubstantial parts of the compilation's content where that conflicts with normal exploitation of the compilation or unreasonably harms the maker's legitimate interests.

The protection lasts 15 years from the end of the year the work was made, extended to 15 years from the end of the year it was first made available to the public if that made-available date falls within the original term, and a contract term that extends the maker's right under subsection 1 in respect of a published work is void.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (595 words)

Denmark transposed the NIS2 Directive through Lov nr 434 af 6. maj 2025 (Lov om foranstaltninger til sikring af et højt cybersikkerhedsniveau, styled NIS 2-loven), signed , published in Lovtidende A on , and in force since under its own Section 33(1).

The Act binds an essential entity (Section 4) or an important entity (Section 5) drawn from its Annex 1 (sectors of particular critical importance) or Annex 2 (other critical sectors), except an entity the Act itself routes to a separate regime: Section 1(2) excludes an entity covered by Denmark's Act on strengthened preparedness in the energy sector, an entity covered by its Act on security and preparedness in the telecommunications sector, and a financial entity the Financial Business Act's Section 333(1) designates, each of which runs under its own parallel security regime rather than being folded into this one.

Annex 1's digital-infrastructure entry (item 8) names an internet-exchange-point provider, a DNS provider other than a root-server operator, a top-level-domain registry, a cloud-computing-service provider, a data-centre-service provider, a content-delivery-network provider, a trust-service provider, and a provider of a public electronic-communications network or service, reached as essential entities by the general size test (250 employees, or annual turnover over EUR 50 million and a balance sheet over EUR 43 million), except that a qualified trust-service provider, a top-level-domain registry and a DNS provider are essential entities regardless of size (Section 4(3)(1)).

Annex 2's digital-provider entry (item 6) separately names an online marketplace, an online search engine, and a social-networking-services-platform provider, reached as important entities at the smaller size test (50 employees, or turnover and balance sheet each over EUR 10 million) once they clear that bar (Section 5(1)).

The wider sector classes both Annexes list by industry (energy, transport, drinking water, health, waste, chemicals, food, manufacturing, space, postal and courier services, and the rest) are reached through the essential-service flag the NIS2 rows carry. The energy-sector, telecom-sector and financial-entity regimes that Section 1(2) excludes are governed by their own laws, among them the telecom-sector act, Lov nr. 435 af 6. maj 2025.

This Act repeals, on the date it took effect, all four of Denmark's 2018 NIS1-era security laws: Lov nr 436 (domain-name-system and digital-service security), Lov nr 437 (internet-exchange-point-operator security), Lov nr 440 (healthcare-sector security), and Lov nr 441 (transport-sector security), each af 8. maj 2018 (Section 33(4) to (7)), so none of those four survives alongside the general Act the way a predecessor NIS1 regime does in some other Member States.

No instrument here imposes a product-security or market-placement duty on a manufacturer independent of the directly applicable Cyber Resilience Act, which is documented at the European Union level and is not restated here.

Denmark has no general reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute with no sector gate; the closest general duty is General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 32's security-of-processing obligation and the Databeskyttelsesloven's own breach-notification duties to Datatilsynet, both of which sit in the privacy topic rather than here.

A violation of the risk-management, registration, incident-notification or recipient-notice duties below (Sections 6, 9, 10, 11, 12(1), 13 or 15) is punished with a criminal fine (bøde) under Section 32, not an administrative fine the competent authority itself may impose, a departure from the EUR 10 million/2 percent (essential entity) and EUR 7 million/1.4 percent (important entity) administrative-fine ceilings most other Member States' own NIS2 transpositions enact; the Act states no fixed monetary maximum or turnover percentage of its own, leaving the amount to Denmark's ordinary criminal-sentencing process, and corporate (legal-person) liability attaches under Chapter 5 of the Criminal Code (straffeloven).

Sector security regimes

Act on Security and Preparedness in the Telecoms Sector (Lov om sikkerhed og beredskab i telesektoren), Security Risk Management Measures

Lov nr. 435 af 6. maj 2025, §§ 3-7 og 31Retsinformation, Lov nr. 435 af 6. maj 2025 (Lovtidende A, )

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Act No. 435 of on security and preparedness in the telecoms sector (Lov om sikkerhed og beredskab i telesektoren) implements parts of the European Electronic Communications Code (Directive (EU) 2018/1972) and parts of NIS2 (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) for providers that make public electronic communications networks or publicly available electronic communications services available in Denmark for commercial purposes.

Under Section 3 a provider is essential if it employs 50 people or more, or has an annual turnover and a balance sheet each above EUR 10 million, and a provider that meets one of the listed criteria, such as being the only provider of a network or service essential for critical societal or economic activities, is essential whatever its size; under Section 4 the other providers are important.

Section 5(1) requires essential and important providers to take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks to the security of the network and information systems they use and to prevent incidents or minimise their impact, covering at least ten categories that mirror NIS2 Article 21. Section 5(2) requires a provider that does not meet a Section 5 requirement to take all necessary corrective measures without undue delay.

Under Section 6 the provider's management body must approve the measures and supervise their implementation, and its members must attend courses on managing information-security risks. Section 7 requires a provider to register with the Danish Agency for Societal Security (Styrelsen for Samfundssikkerhed) within two weeks of falling under the Act and to report changes within two weeks. Section 31 punishes a violation of Section 5(1) or (2) with a fine. The Act entered into force on .

What it requires

NIS 2-loven, Cybersecurity Risk-Management Measures and Registration

NIS 2-loven, §§ 6-10Consolidated text, retsinformation.dk, NIS 2-loven, LOV nr 434 af 06/05/2025, gældende (current) version

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 6 requires an essential entity or an important entity to take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks to the network and information systems it uses for its operations or to provide its services, and to prevent an incident or minimise its impact on the recipients of its services and on other services, covering at minimum risk-analysis and information-system-security policy, incident handling, operational continuity, supply-chain security, secure acquisition and development including vulnerability handling and disclosure, effectiveness-assessment policy, cyber hygiene and training, cryptography policy, personnel and access-management security, and, where relevant, multi-factor or continuous authentication and secured communications (Section 6(1)); an entity that falls short must take corrective measures without undue delay (Section 6(2)).

Section 7 requires the entity's management board (ledelsesorgan) to approve these measures, oversee their implementation, and ensure its own members receive cybersecurity risk-management training.

Section 9 requires a DNS provider, a top-level-domain registry, a domain-name-registration-service provider, and a provider of cloud-computing, data-centre, content-delivery-network, managed, managed-security, online-marketplace, online-search-engine or social-networking-services-platform services to register with the relevant competent authority within 3 months of first falling within the Act's scope; Section 10 requires other essential and important entities to register within 2 weeks.

This Act, Lov nr 434 af 6. maj 2025 (NIS 2-loven), transposes NIS2 Directive Articles 20 and 21. By Section 1(2), it does not apply to an entity covered by Denmark's separate energy-sector preparedness Act, its telecommunications-sector security and preparedness Act, or the financial entities the Financial Business Act's Section 333(1) designates, each of which runs its own parallel regime.

By Section 33(4) to (7), it also repeals Denmark's four 2018 NIS1-era security laws (Lov nr 436, 437, 440 and 441 af 8. maj 2018).

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Act on Security and Preparedness in the Telecoms Sector (Lov om sikkerhed og beredskab i telesektoren), Significant Incident Notification

Lov nr. 435 af 6. maj 2025, §§ 8, 9 og 11Retsinformation, Lov nr. 435 af 6. maj 2025 (Lovtidende A, )

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 8(2) of Act No. 435 of on security and preparedness in the telecoms sector requires telecoms providers to notify the Danish Agency for Societal Security (Styrelsen for Samfundssikkerhed) and the computer security incident response team (CSIRT) of every significant incident under the procedure in Section 9.

Under Section 8(3) an incident is significant if it has caused or can cause severe operational disruption of networks or services or financial loss to the provider, or has affected or can affect other persons by causing considerable material or non-material damage.

Under Section 9(1) the provider sends an early warning without undue delay and within 24 hours of becoming aware of the significant incident, an incident notification within 72 hours, an interim report on the authority's request, and a final report no later than one month after the incident notification, with a status report and a final report within one month of the incident being handled if it is still ongoing.

Section 11 requires the provider to tell the recipients of its services without undue delay when a significant incident is likely to affect their service negatively, and to tell recipients potentially affected by a significant cyber threat of the measures they can take. The Act entered into force on .

What it requires

NIS 2-loven, Significant-Incident Reporting and Recipient-Notice Duties

NIS 2-loven, §§ 12-13, 15Consolidated text, retsinformation.dk, NIS 2-loven, LOV nr 434 af 06/05/2025, gældende (current) version

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 12 requires an essential entity or an important entity to notify the relevant competent authority and Denmark's computer security incident response team (CSIRT) of every significant incident, defined as one that has caused or can cause serious operational disruption or financial loss for the entity, or that has affected or can affect another person through significant physical or non-physical harm.

Section 13 sets the notification clock: an early warning without undue delay and no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the incident (Section 13(1)(1)); a notification without undue delay and in any case within 72 hours, updating the early warning with an initial severity and impact assessment (Section 13(1)(2)); an interim report on the CSIRT's request (Section 13(1)(3)); and a final report no later than one month after the notification, or, if the incident is still ongoing, a status report at that point and a final report within one month of the incident being handled (Section 13(1)(4) and (5)).

A trust-service provider must send the Section 13(1)(2) notification of a significant incident without undue delay and within 24 hours (Section 13(2)); the CSIRT must acknowledge an early warning within 24 hours and, on request, can offer guidance and operational advice (Section 13(3)).

Section 15 separately requires an essential or important entity to notify its service recipients, without undue delay, of a significant incident likely to adversely affect the delivery of their service, and to inform any recipient potentially affected by a significant cyber threat of the protective or responsive measures available to them.

This Act, Lov nr 434 af 6. maj 2025 (NIS 2-loven), transposes NIS2 Directive Article 23 and, by Section 33(4) to (7), repeals Denmark's four 2018 NIS1-era security laws (Lov nr 436, 437, 440 and 441 af 8. maj 2018).

What it requires

Communications law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (234 words)

Denmark applies the ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC) to contact and devices through its own acts, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) applies directly.

Section 10, paragraphs 1 to 3 of the Marketing Practices Act (markedsføringsloven) allows direct marketing by electronic mail, an automatic calling system or fax only with the recipient's prior consent, with an exception for a trader's own similar products sold to the customer, and requires electronic marketing mail to be identifiable and to carry an address for stopping it.

Section 10, paragraphs 4 to 6 lets a natural person opt out of direct marketing by other means of distance communication, including telephone calls, through the Central Person Register (CPR) list. The Consumer Ombudsman supervises that Act, a breach of section 10 is punished with a fine, and anyone with a legal interest may sue under section 32.

The Cookie Order (cookiebekendtgørelsen) bars storing information in, or accessing information in, an end user's terminal equipment without the user's consent after full information, with exceptions for carrying a communication and for a service the user expressly requested. Section 24 of the Whistleblower Protection Act has an oral report documented by a recording only with the whistleblower's consent, or by minutes or a transcript the whistleblower can approve.

A data subject's right to object to direct marketing is held in the privacy row for GDPR Articles 12 to 21 and 23, Data Subject Rights as Applied in Denmark.

Commercial messages

Marketing Practices Act (Markedsføringsloven), Section 10, Paragraphs 1 to 3, Direct Marketing by Electronic Mail, Automatic Calling Systems and Fax

Markedsføringsloven, § 10, stk. 1-3Text of the consolidated Markedsføringsloven (LBK nr. 1420 of ) as published by Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 10, paragraph 1 of the Marketing Practices Act (markedsføringsloven) bars a trader from contacting anyone by electronic mail, an automatic calling system or fax for direct marketing unless that person has given prior consent. Section 10, paragraph 1 requires the person to be told before consenting that the consent can be withdrawn, and requires the trader to offer an easy and free way to withdraw it.

Section 10, paragraph 2 lets a trader that received a customer's electronic address in connection with a sale market its own similar products to the customer by electronic mail without prior consent, if it gives the customer a clear and unambiguous, easy and free opportunity to object both when the address is given and in every later contact.

Section 10, paragraph 3 requires a direct-marketing electronic mail to be clearly identifiable as marketing, to make the conditions of promotional measures easy to reach and clearly presented, to show on whose behalf it is sent, not to urge the recipient to visit websites that fail those requirements, and to carry an address the recipient can use to stop such contact. Section 24, paragraph 2 makes an act in breach of the Act a ground for damages under the general rules of Danish law.

Section 25, paragraph 1 has the Consumer Ombudsman (Forbrugerombudsmanden) supervise compliance with the Act. Section 32, paragraph 1 lets anyone with a legal interest bring an action for an injunction, an order, damages and compensation under section 24. Section 37, paragraph 3 punishes a breach of section 10 with a fine, unless a higher penalty is deserved under section 279 of the Penal Code or other legislation. The Act takes effect on . Law 1309 of , in force from , amended section 10, paragraph 1.

What it requires

Device storage and tracking consent

Cookie Order (Cookiebekendtgørelsen), Sections 3 and 4, Information and Consent for Storing or Accessing Information in Terminal Equipment

Bekendtgørelse nr. 1148 af 9. december 2011, § 3-4Text of Bekendtgørelse nr. 1148 of as published by Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 3, paragraph 1 of the Cookie Order bars a natural or legal person from storing information in, or gaining access to information already stored in, an end user's terminal equipment, or letting a third party do so, unless the end user consents after receiving full information about the storage or access.

Section 3, paragraph 2 makes the information full only if it is clear, precise and easy to understand, states the purpose, identifies each person arranging the storage or access, gives immediate access to refuse or withdraw consent with clear guidance on using it, and is immediately accessible to the end user.

Section 3, paragraph 2 also requires information on storage or access through an information and content service to be permanently available through a direct and clearly marked access on that service. Section 4, paragraph 1 lifts the ban where the storage or access has the sole purpose of carrying communication over an electronic communications network, or is required to enable the provider of an information society service the end user expressly requested to deliver it.

Section 4, paragraph 2 treats storage or access as required where it is a technical precondition for delivering a service that works in line with its purpose. Section 5, paragraph 1 punishes a breach of section 3 with a fine. The Order takes effect on .

What it requires

Interception and recording consent

Whistleblower Protection Act (Lov om beskyttelse af whistleblowere), Sections 9 and 24, Recording of Oral Reports

Lov om beskyttelse af whistleblowere, § 9 og § 24Text of Lov nr. 1436 of on protection of whistleblowers as published by Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 9, paragraph 1 of the Whistleblower Protection Act requires employers with 50 or more employees to set up an internal whistleblower scheme in which employees can report the matters the Act covers. Section 24, paragraph 1 requires oral reports to be documented by recording the conversation or meeting with the whistleblower's consent, or by accurate minutes that the whistleblower can check, correct and accept by signing.

Section 24, paragraph 2 also allows an oral report made through a telephone system to be documented by an accurate transcript of the conversation that the whistleblower can check, correct and accept by signing. Section 31 provides that the Act takes effect on and that chapter 3 takes effect for private-sector employers with 50 to 249 employees on .

What it requires

Telephone contact

Marketing Practices Act (Markedsføringsloven), Section 10, Paragraphs 4 to 6, Telephone and Other Distance Direct Marketing, Robinson List

Markedsføringsloven, § 10, stk. 4-6Text of the consolidated Markedsføringsloven (LBK nr. 1420 of ) as published by Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 10, paragraph 4 of the Marketing Practices Act bars a trader from contacting a specific natural person for direct marketing by means of distance communication other than electronic mail, an automatic calling system or fax if the person has told the trader not to, if the quarterly register kept by the Central Person Register (CPR) shows that the person has opted out of direct marketing, or if the trader has learned from a CPR lookup that the person has.

Section 10, paragraph 5 disapplies the two CPR limbs of paragraph 4 where the person has previously asked the trader to make the contact. Section 10, paragraph 6 requires a trader that first contacts a specific natural person by those means to state clearly and unambiguously the right to opt out of its direct marketing, and to always offer an easy and free way to opt out of such contact.

Section 37, paragraph 7 lists unsolicited telephone contact for direct marketing with a natural person on the Robinson list, or who has opted out of the trader's marketing, as a breach of section 10, paragraph 4 for which the duration or extent of the breach counts in setting the fine. Section 25, paragraph 1 has the Consumer Ombudsman (Forbrugerombudsmanden) supervise compliance with the Act.

Section 32, paragraph 1 lets anyone with a legal interest bring an action for an injunction, an order, damages and compensation under section 24. Section 37, paragraph 3 punishes a breach of section 10 with a fine, unless a higher penalty is deserved under section 279 of the Penal Code or other legislation. The Act takes effect on .

What it requires

Product and AI liability law2 instruments, 1 in force, 1 proposed

Research summary (164 words)

The Produktansvarslov is Denmark's product liability act, and Retsinformation holds its consolidated text as Lovbekendtgørelse 261 of . The Ministry of Justice's memorandum to Bill L 32 states that section 3 of that Act implements Article 2 of Directive 85/374/EEC. The Minister of Justice presented Bill L 32, a new Produktansvarslov that implements Directive (EU) 2024/2853, to the Folketing on .

Under the bill the new Act enters into force on , the present Act is repealed, and the present rules keep applying to products put into circulation or into use before that date. The bill defines a product to include software. The bill leaves out free open-source software that is developed or supplied outside commercial activity. The Ministry of Justice proposes to keep the development-risk defense by not using the option in Article 18(1) of the Directive. The NIS 2-loven, Lov nr. 434 of 2025, which sets the Danish cybersecurity baseline, is recorded in the security topic.

Product liability

Forslag til Lov om produktansvar (Bill L 32), Implementation of Directive (EU) 2024/2853

Forslag til Lov om produktansvar, L 32 (2026/1)Text of Bill L 32 (2026/1) with its explanatory remarks on Retsinformation, and the Folketing's open-data record of the case

Proposed. proposed Not law. It binds no one unless it is enacted.

Introduced in the first chamber, dated , as of . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Bill L 32 of the 2026-27 session of the Folketing, a Forslag til Lov om produktansvar, was presented by the Minister of Justice on . The Ministry of Justice states that the purpose of the bill is to implement Directive (EU) 2024/2853 in Danish law. The Folketing's open-data record of the case lists the step Lovforslag som fremsat for the bill, dated . Section 18 of the bill would bring the new Act into force on .

Section 18 would repeal the Produktansvarslov in force and keep its rules for products put into circulation or into use before the new Act enters into force. Section 1 applies the new Act to the liability of economic operators for damage caused by defective products that have been put into circulation or put into use. Section 1 excludes free open-source software that is developed or supplied outside commercial activity.

Section 3 defines a product as any movable object, including electricity, digital manufacturing files, raw materials and software. The memorandum says that, compared with the present law, the product concept is clarified to cover software, intangible products and raw materials as well. The memorandum says that operating systems, firmware, computer programs, applications and AI systems will be products under the Act.

The memorandum says that software is a product however it is supplied, whether it is stored on a device, accessed through a communication network or cloud technology, or supplied as Software-as-a-Service. Section 3 defines a component as any tangible or intangible object, any raw material and any related service that is integrated into or connected with a product. Section 4 gives any natural person who suffers damage caused by a defective product a right to compensation under the Act.

Section 5 covers death and personal injury including psychological injury, damage to or destruction of property, and destruction or corruption of data not used for professional purposes. Section 5 leaves out of the property damage covered the defective product itself, a product damaged by a defective component that its manufacturer integrated or controls, and property used exclusively for professional purposes.

Section 6 weighs among the circumstances in judging a defect the relevant product safety requirements, including safety-relevant cybersecurity requirements. Section 6 also weighs the effect on the product of any ability to keep learning or to acquire new functions after it is put into circulation or into use. Section 7 makes liable the manufacturer of a defective product, including for a defective component that is integrated into or connected with a product the manufacturer controls.

Where the manufacturer is established outside the European Union, section 7 also makes liable the importer, the authorized representative and, if there is neither, the provider of distribution services. Section 7 treats a person who substantially modifies a product outside the manufacturer's control, and then makes it available on the market or puts it into use, as its manufacturer.

Section 7 makes each distributor liable where no operator established in the European Union can be identified, unless the distributor names one or its own supplier within a month of the injured person's request.

Section 7 applies the same rule to a provider of an online platform that lets consumers conclude distance contracts with traders and is not itself an economic operator, where the platform presents the product in a way that leads an average consumer to believe that the platform or a recipient under its authority supplies it.

Section 10 has the court order an economic operator defendant to disclose relevant evidence in its control, on the request of an injured person who has put forward facts and evidence sufficient to support the claim. Section 11 leaves the injured person to prove the defect, the damage and the causal link between them. Section 11 presumes the product defective where an economic operator does not comply with a disclosure order under section 10.

Section 11 also presumes the product defective where the injured person shows that it does not meet mandatory product safety requirements meant to protect against the damage suffered. Section 11 presumes the defect or the causal link where, despite disclosure, the injured person faces disproportionate difficulties because of technical or scientific complexity and shows that the defect or the causal link is likely.

Section 12 releases an economic operator that proves, among other things, that the objective scientific and technical knowledge at the relevant time did not allow the defect to be discovered. The Ministry of Justice proposes not to use the option in Article 18(1) of the Directive to keep operators liable for development risks.

Section 12 denies the exemption for a defect that arose after circulation where the defect is due, within the manufacturer's control, to a related service, to software including updates or upgrades, to missing software updates or upgrades needed to maintain safety, or to a substantial modification.

Section 13 denies a manufacturer that integrates software as a component a right of recourse against the manufacturer of a defective software component that was a micro or small enterprise when it put the component into circulation, where the two agreed to waive the right. Section 2 provides that an economic operator's liability under the Act cannot be limited or departed from by agreement to the detriment of the injured person.

Section 15 sets a limitation period of 3 years for bringing an action for compensation, running from the day the injured person knew or should reasonably have known of the damage, the defect and the identity of the liable operator. Section 16 ends the right to compensation 10 years after the day the defective product was put into circulation or into use, unless the injured person has brought proceedings in the meantime. Section 16 extends the period to 25 years where the latency of a personal injury prevented an action within 10 years.

What it requires

Produktansvarsloven (Lov om produktansvar), Liability for Damage Caused by a Defective Product (Directive 85/374/EEC)

Lov om produktansvar, lovbekendtgørelse nr. 261 af 20. marts 2007Text of Lovbekendtgørelse nr. 261 af 20. marts 2007 on Retsinformation, with Act 523 of and the original Act 371 of

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Section 1 applies the Act to the liability of a producer and an intermediary for damage caused by a defect in a product that the producer or intermediary produced or supplied. Section 3 defines a product as any movable object (løsøregenstand), whether processed or a natural product, including one incorporated as a component of another movable object or of immovable property. Section 3 extends the rules on products to electricity.

The Ministry of Justice's memorandum to Bill L 32 says that it has been unclear to what extent intangible products such as software are covered by the product concept of the Act. The same memorandum takes it that damage caused by a physical object that contains software is covered by the Act, whether the damage comes from the object or from the software itself. Section 2 covers compensation for personal injury and loss of a provider.

Section 2 covers damage to a thing only where the thing is by its nature ordinarily intended for non-business use and was mainly used that way by the injured person. Section 2 leaves damage to the defective product itself outside the Act. Section 4 treats as producer the person who makes a finished product, a part product or a raw material, and the person who puts its name, mark or other distinguishing feature on a product to present itself as the producer.

Section 4 also treats as producer the person who, in the course of its business, imports a product into the European Community for resale, hire, leasing or another form of circulation. Section 4 treats every intermediary as the producer where the injured person cannot establish who produced the product, or who imported it from outside the European Community.

That treatment does not apply where the intermediary gives the injured person, within a reasonable time, the name and address of the producer or importer or of the person who supplied the product to it. Section 5 makes a product defective when it does not offer the safety that can rightly be expected, taking account of all circumstances, in particular its marketing, the use that can reasonably be expected and the time it was put into circulation.

Section 6 makes a producer liable to compensate damage caused by a defect in a product that it produced or supplied. Section 6 leaves the injured person to prove the damage, the defect and the causal link between them.

Section 7 releases the producer where it proves that it did not put the product into circulation, that it did not make or circulate it in the course of a business, that the defect results from mandatory rules issued by a public authority, or that the state of scientific and technical knowledge when the product was put into circulation made the defect impossible to discover.

Section 7 also releases the producer where it must be assumed that the defect that caused the damage did not exist when the producer put the product into circulation. Section 7 releases the producer of a part product that proves that the defect results from the design of the product into which the part was incorporated or from instructions given by the maker of the finished product. Section 8 deducts DKK 4,000 when compensation for damage to a thing is fixed.

Section 10 makes an intermediary liable for product damage covered by section 2 unless it shows that the damage is not due to its own fault or negligence. Section 11 makes two or more persons who are liable under the Act for the same damage jointly and severally liable. Section 12 provides that the Act cannot be departed from by prior agreement to the detriment of the injured person.

Section 13 leaves the injured person's access to compensation under the general rules on compensation in or outside contract in place. Section 14, as rewritten by Act 523 of , subjects claims for product damage to the limitation rules of the Limitation Act. The rewritten section 14 makes limitation of a claim against the producer under section 6 occur at the latest 10 years after the day the producer put the damaging product into circulation.

Act 523 of entered into force on . The Ministry of Justice's memorandum to Bill L 32 states that the general limitation period under the Limitation Act is 3 years. Section 17 of the original Act brought it into force on the day after its publication in Lovtidende. Retsinformation dates the publication of the original Act, Act 371 of , to . Retsinformation shows the consolidated text, Lovbekendtgørelse 261 of , as in force.

Bill L 32 would repeal the Act. Under the bill the present rules would keep applying to products put into circulation or into use before the new Act enters into force.

What it requires

Digital accessibility law6 instruments, 6 in force

Research summary (552 words)

The Act on accessibility requirements for products and services (Act 801 of ) implements parts of Directive (EU) 2019/882, the European Accessibility Act. Section 59(1) of that Act applies it to products and services placed on the market or supplied from . Act 637 of amended the Act, among other things by adding section 13 a on guidelines and tools for microenterprises.

Executive Order 823 of , made under section 33(2) of the Accessibility Act, requires traders dealing in the products the Act covers to be able to give, for 5 years, the information on who supplied them and whom they supplied. Sikkerhedsstyrelsen, which section 45(2) of the Accessibility Act names as the control authority for products and for most of the services, merged with the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen) on .

Executive Order 944 of under the Radio and Television Act requires television and on-demand audiovisual media service providers working under a licence or registration to make their programmes gradually more accessible to persons with disabilities. Section 40(3) of the Public Procurement Act requires accessibility to be taken into account in the technical specifications of procurement intended for use by natural persons.

Executive Order 1078 of binds contracting entities in the water, energy, transport and postal sectors to the provisions of the Utilities Directive, Directive 2014/25/EU.

The Act on the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability applies to all public and private activity outside the labour market and carries no duty of reasonable accommodation or accessibility, except for the reasonable individual adjustment of services in day care and schools that its section 9 a gives children and young people with disabilities.

In a decision of on a complaint about a public authority’s website, the Board of Equal Treatment held that the Act sets no further accessibility requirements than other legislation, and that a failure by a private or public business to comply with accessibility rules is dealt with under the rules of its own sector.

Section 60 of the Accessibility Act inserts sections 22 a and 22 b into the Police Act, which let the Minister of Justice set minimum requirements for the alarm centres’ handling of alarm communications from end users and for the emergency services’ handling of alarms from the alarm centres.

Executive Order 1001 of , made under those sections, requires the alarm centres to be able to receive alarm communications from end users as calls, as synchronised voice and text including real-time text, and as total conversation where video is provided. Section 10(2) of that Order brings the requirements for synchronised voice and text and for total conversation into force on .

Article 31(3) of the Directive allows Member States to apply the measures on the answering of emergency communications under Article 4(8) from at the latest. Section 61 of the Accessibility Act excludes the Faroe Islands and Greenland from its territorial scope, but lets it be brought into force there, wholly or partly, by royal decree.

Web accessibility of public bodies is regulated by the Act on the accessibility of public bodies’ websites and mobile applications, which is covered on law.ungovr.org in the public-sector accessibility entry for Denmark.

Accessibility requirements

Accessibility Act (Tilgængelighedsloven), accessibility requirements for products and the obligations of manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers and distributors

Tilgængelighedsloven, produkter (lov nr. 801 af 7. juni 2022), §§ 1, stk. 1, 4-5, 8-10, 12, 14-33 og 38-57Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 1(1) applies the Act to consumer computer hardware systems and operating systems for general purposes, payment terminals, cash machines, ticketing machines, check-in machines and interactive information terminals intended for the services the Act covers (other than those installed as an integral part of vehicles, aircraft, ships or rolling stock), consumer terminal equipment with interactive computing capability used for electronic communications services or to access audiovisual media services, and e-readers.

The Act implements parts of Directive (EU) 2019/882, the European Accessibility Act. Article 31(2) of the Directive requires EU countries to apply their implementing measures from . Section 59(1) of the Act applies it to products and services placed on the market or supplied from . Section 4 of the Act allows a product to be placed on the market only if it meets the relevant accessibility requirements in Annex 1.

Section 5(1) requires products to meet the requirements in parts 1 and 2 of Annex 1. Section 5(2) requires self-service terminals to meet only the requirements in part 1 of Annex 1. Section 14 presumes a product that conforms to harmonised standards, or parts of them, whose references are published in the Official Journal of the European Union to meet the accessibility requirements the standards cover.

Section 15(1) gives the same presumption to conformity with the technical specifications that the Commission adopts under Article 15(3) of the Directive. Section 8(1) disapplies the accessibility requirements to the extent that compliance would need a significant change that fundamentally alters the basic nature of the product, or would impose a disproportionate burden on the trader.

Article 14(1) of the Directive likewise applies the accessibility requirements only to the extent that compliance requires no fundamental alteration and imposes no disproportionate burden. Section 8(2) denies the disproportionate-burden defence to a trader that does not use only its own funds to improve accessibility. Sections 9(1) and 9(2) require the trader to assess the defence against the criteria in Annex 5 and to document the assessment.

Section 9(3) requires the documentation to be kept for at least 5 years after the product was last made available. Section 9(4) requires the trader to give the control authority a copy of the documentation on request. Section 10(1) exempts a microenterprise that trades in products from documenting the assessment. Section 10(2) requires such a microenterprise, when it relies on section 8, to give the authority on request the information relevant to the assessment.

Section 12(1) requires a trader that relies on section 8 to send that information to the relevant control authority. Section 12(2) exempts microenterprises from that duty. Section 17(1) requires a manufacturer to draw up the technical documentation, to have the conformity assessment procedure carried out except where section 8 applies, and to draw up the EU declaration of conformity and affix the CE marking.

Section 25(2) requires an importer to check the conformity assessment procedure, the CE marking and the EU declaration of conformity of every product except one that is exempt from the accessibility requirements under section 8(1). Section 29(2) requires a distributor to check the CE marking of every product except one that is wholly exempt under section 8(1).

Executive Order 823 of , made under section 33(2) of the Act, requires a trader dealing in products to be able to give, for a period of 5 years, the information on every other trader that supplied it with a product or that it supplied with a product. Section 38(2) requires the EU declaration of conformity of a product that is partly exempt under section 8(1) to state which accessibility requirements the product is exempt from.

Section 45(2) makes the Danish Safety Technology Authority (Sikkerhedsstyrelsen) the control authority for the products in section 1(1). Section 47(1) gives the control authority access to business premises and means of transport at any time, on proper identification and without a court order. Section 49(1) lets the control authority order a trader to put a non-conforming product right within a set time.

Section 49 then lets it order the trader to stop selling the product or to withdraw it from the market within a set time. Act 637 of added a paragraph to section 49 that lets the authority order a trader dealing in products to put right a misplaced or missing CE marking, a missing or incorrect EU declaration of conformity, missing technical documentation, missing identification details or any other administrative requirement on manufacturers and importers.

Section 50(2) lets the authority order a trader to stop selling a product that wrongly bears the CE marking and, if necessary, to withdraw it from the market. Section 50(3) lets it order a manufacturer or importer to remove the CE marking within a set time. Section 55(1) lets a consumer bring a matter before the relevant control authority. Section 56 bars an appeal against the control authorities’ decisions to any other administrative authority.

Section 57(1) punishes with a fine anyone who breaches sections 4 and 5, 9(2) and 9(3), 12(1), 38 to 40 or 43 and 44, fails to give the authority information under sections 9(4), 10(2), 33(1) or 46, fails to fulfil the manufacturer, importer and distributor obligations in sections 16 to 21 and 24 to 31 or the obligations of an authorised representative’s mandate under section 23(1), obstructs the authority’s access under section 47(1), disregards its decisions or evades or attempts to evade its control, or wrongly uses the CE marking, unless a higher penalty is incurred under other legislation.

Section 57(3) allows companies and other legal persons to be held criminally liable in accordance with chapter 5 of the Penal Code. Section 57 states no amount for the fine. The remarks to bill L 131 of the 2021-22 session, which became the Act, leave the size of the fine to the courts’ assessment of all the circumstances of each case. The same remarks state that the Ministry found no basis for imprisonment for breaches of the Act.

Article 30(1) and (2) of the Directive require EU countries to lay down penalties for infringements of the national provisions that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The remarks to bill L 8 of the 2026-27 session state that Sikkerhedsstyrelsen merged with the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen) on and is now part of it. Bill L 8, as presented on , would write Erhvervsstyrelsen in place of Sikkerhedsstyrelsen in section 45(2) of the Act.

The bill would also add a section 49 a, under which the control authority informs the Commission and the other Member States when a product’s non-compliance is not limited to products made available in Denmark. Section 4 of the bill sets for its entry into force. Section 58 of the Act brought it into force on .

Act 637 of also added section 51 a, which requires the control authority to give consumers on request, in an accessible format, its own information on traders’ compliance with the accessibility requirements and on their exemption assessments. Section 5(2) of Act 637 brought its section 4, which amended the Accessibility Act, into force on , the day after its publication in Lovtidende on .

What it requires

Accessibility Act (Tilgængelighedsloven), accessibility requirements for services and the obligations of service providers

Tilgængelighedsloven, tjenester (lov nr. 801 af 7. juni 2022), §§ 1, stk. 2, 2, 4, 6-9, 11-12, 34-37, 45-57 og 59Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 1(2) applies the Act to electronic communications services other than machine-to-machine transmission services, services that give access to audiovisual media services, elements of air, bus, rail and ship passenger transport, consumer banking services, e-books and dedicated software, and e-commerce services, when they are supplied to consumers.

For passenger transport, section 1(2), item 3 covers websites, services for mobile devices, electronic tickets and ticketing services, travel information including real-time information (on information screens, only interactive screens in the European Union), and interactive self-service terminals in the European Union, and for urban, suburban and regional transport only the self-service terminals. The Act implements parts of Directive (EU) 2019/882, the European Accessibility Act.

Section 59(1) of the Act applies it to products and services placed on the market or supplied from . Section 4 of the Act allows a service to be supplied only if it meets the relevant accessibility requirements in Annex 1. Section 6(1) requires services to meet the requirements in parts 3 and 4 of Annex 1. Section 6(2) requires urban, suburban and regional transport services to meet only the requirements in part 4 of Annex 1.

For electronic communications, part 4 of Annex 1 requires real-time text in addition to voice communication, total conversation where video is provided in addition to voice, and emergency communications that are synchronised and sent by the providers of electronic communications services to the most appropriate alarm centre, including the emergency communications referred to in Article 109(2) of Directive (EU) 2018/1972.

Section 6(3) exempts microenterprises that provide services from the requirements in parts 3 and 4 of Annex 1 and from every obligation connected with them. Article 4(5) of the Directive exempts microenterprises providing services from the accessibility requirements for services and from any obligation relating to compliance with them.

Act 637 of added section 13 a, which obliges the business, climate-energy-utilities and transport ministers to prepare guidelines and tools for microenterprises.

Section 2 excludes from the Act pre-recorded time-based media and document formats published before , online maps and mapping services where essential navigation information is given in an accessible digital manner, third-party content the trader neither finances, develops nor controls, and archive content not updated or edited after .

Section 7 deems a service that meets the accessible-information requirements of the EU passenger rights regulations and of the acts adopted under Directives 2008/57/EC and (EU) 2016/797 to meet the corresponding requirements of the Act, and applies the Act’s additional requirements in full.

Section 8(1) disapplies the accessibility requirements for services to the extent that compliance would need a significant change that fundamentally alters the basic nature of the service, or would impose a disproportionate burden on the trader. Section 8(2) denies the disproportionate-burden defence to a trader that does not use only its own funds to improve accessibility.

Sections 9(1) and 9(2) require the trader to assess the defence against the criteria in Annex 5 and to document the assessment. Section 9(3) requires the documentation to be kept for at least 5 years after the service was last supplied. Section 11 requires a service provider that relies on the disproportionate-burden defence to renew the assessment for each category or type of service when the service changes or the authority asks, and in any event at least every five years.

Section 12(1) requires a trader that relies on section 8 for a service to send that information to the relevant control authority. Section 12(2) exempts microenterprises from that duty. Section 14 presumes a service that conforms to harmonised standards, or parts of them, whose references are published in the Official Journal of the European Union to meet the accessibility requirements the standards cover.

Section 34 requires a service provider to ensure that the services it designs and supplies conform to the Act. Section 35(1) requires a service provider, before supplying a service, to prepare the information required by Annex 4 and to explain how the service meets the accessibility requirements. Section 35(2) and (3) require the information to be published in writing and orally, including in a way accessible to persons with disabilities, and kept for as long as the service is offered.

Section 37(2) requires a service provider to inform the relevant control authority in every Member State where the service is supplied of any non-conformity and the measures taken. Section 59(2) lets a service provider keep supplying similar services with products lawfully used for services before until . Section 59(3) lets service agreements concluded before continue unchanged until they expire and at the latest until .

Section 59(4) lets payment terminals and self-service terminals within section 1(1), items 2 and 3, lawfully used to provide services before keep providing similar services until the end of their economic life and at most 20 years after they were put into use. Article 32(1) of the Directive requires the Member States to provide for a transitional period ending on for services provided with products lawfully used before that date.

Article 32(2) of the Directive allows the Member States to let such self-service terminals stay in use until the end of their economically useful life and for no longer than 20 years. Section 45(2) makes the Danish Safety Technology Authority (Sikkerhedsstyrelsen) the control authority for services that give access to audiovisual media services, consumer banking services, e-books and dedicated software, and e-commerce services.

Section 45(3) makes the Danish Energy Agency (Energistyrelsen) the control authority for electronic communications services. Section 45(4) makes the Danish Transport Authority (Trafikstyrelsen) the control authority for the elements of air, bus and rail passenger transport and for the self-service terminals of ship passenger transport. Section 45(5) makes the Danish Maritime Authority (Søfartsstyrelsen) the control authority for the other elements of ship passenger transport.

Section 47(1) gives the control authority access to business premises and means of transport at any time, on proper identification and without a court order. Section 49(1) lets the control authority order a trader to put a non-conforming service right within a set time. Section 49 then lets it order the trader to stop offering the service within a set time. Section 55(1) lets a consumer bring a matter before the relevant control authority.

Section 55(2) lets public bodies, private associations, organisations and other legal entities with a legitimate interest take part in any judicial or administrative proceeding before the courts or the control authority, on behalf of or in support of the complainant. Section 55(4) lets the business minister set rules for a complaints board for consumer complaints pursuant to the Act. Section 56 bars an appeal against the control authorities’ decisions to any other administrative authority.

Section 57(1) punishes with a fine anyone who breaches section 4, section 6(1) or (2), 9(2) and 9(3), 11 or 12(1), fails to give the authority information under sections 9(4) or 46, fails to fulfil the service provider obligations in sections 34 to 37, obstructs the authority’s access under section 47(1), or disregards its decisions or evades or attempts to evade its control, unless a higher penalty is incurred under other legislation.

Section 57(3) allows companies and other legal persons to be held criminally liable in accordance with chapter 5 of the Penal Code. Section 57 states no amount for the fine. The remarks to bill L 131 of the 2021-22 session, which became the Act, leave the size of the fine to the courts’ assessment of all the circumstances of each case. The same remarks state that the Ministry found no basis for imprisonment for breaches of the Act.

Article 30(1) and (2) of the Directive require EU countries to lay down penalties for infringements of the national provisions that are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. The remarks to bill L 8 of the 2026-27 session state that Sikkerhedsstyrelsen merged with the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen) on and is now part of it.

The same remarks state that the Danish Agency for Digital Government (Digitaliseringsstyrelsen) has taken over responsibility for electronic communications services following a royal resolution of August 2024. Bill L 8, as presented on , would write Erhvervsstyrelsen in place of Sikkerhedsstyrelsen in section 45(2) of the Act and Digitaliseringsstyrelsen in place of Energistyrelsen in section 45(3).

The bill would also add a section 2(2) under which the Act does not apply to matters covered by the Copyright Act or by Regulation (EU) 2017/1563. It would add a section 2 a under which products and services that meet the Act may not be prevented from being made available or supplied in Denmark for reasons related to accessibility requirements. Section 4 of the bill sets for its entry into force.

Act 637 of also added section 51 a, which requires the control authority to give consumers on request, in an accessible format, its own information on traders’ compliance with the accessibility requirements and on their exemption assessments. Section 5(2) of Act 637 brought its section 4, which amended the Accessibility Act, into force on , the day after its publication in Lovtidende on .

What it requires

Executive Order on the accessibility of programme activity under licence and registration for persons with disabilities

Bekendtgørelse om tilgængelighed af programvirksomhed på grundlag af tilladelse og registrering for personer med handicap (BEK nr. 944 af 18. juni 2020)Retsinformation

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Executive Order 944 of is made under section 48(2) of the Radio and Television Act. Section 48(2) of that Act requires the Minister for Culture to lay down provisions that make programme activity gradually more accessible to persons with disabilities by proportionate measures. The Order implements parts of Directive 2018/1808/EU, which amended the Audiovisual Media Services Directive.

Section 1(1) applies the Order to providers of television and on-demand audiovisual media services under Danish jurisdiction that are covered by chapter 8 of the Radio and Television Act, which governs programme activity under a licence or registration. Section 1(2) excludes the public service programme activity of DR, TV 2 DANMARK A/S and the regional TV 2 companies, and the public service programme activity under section 11(2) of the Radio and Television Act.

Section 1(3) sets their accessibility obligations in their public service contracts and licence. Section 1(4) sets accessibility conditions for the public service programme activity of section 11(2) of the Radio and Television Act in the permits that the Radio and Television Board grants after tender. Section 2(1) requires a provider to make its programme activity gradually and continuously more accessible to persons with disabilities by proportionate measures.

Section 2(2) names as measures sign-language interpretation, subtitling for deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers, read-aloud subtitles and audio description. Section 3(1) requires a provider to submit action plans to the Radio and Television Board that state how it will seek to meet section 2, and the plans apply as a rule for three years. Section 3(2) requires account to be taken of technological development, user needs, usefulness and resources in choosing the measures offered.

Section 3(3) has the Board assess whether an action plan can be noted or needs changes. Section 4(1) requires a provider to report regularly to the Board on carrying out the action plans. Section 5(1) makes the Radio and Television Board (Radio- og tv-nævnet) the supervisor of the action plans, the accessibility measures and the reporting. Section 5(2) has the Board issue a formal reprimand (påtale) for a breach of the rules.

Section 5(3) lets the Board decide whether the rules are complied with. Section 6(1) has the Board hear complaints about whether a provider has put accessibility measures in place. Section 6(2) makes information and guidance on the rules, and on the complaint route, available at an easily accessible online contact point on the website of the Agency for Culture and Palaces (Slots- og Kulturstyrelsen).

Section 7 lets the Board require a provider to supply information, documents and written statements about its operations. Section 8 refers to section 50 of the Radio and Television Act, under which the Board may withdraw a programme licence temporarily or permanently, or suspend or end programme activity, if the provider grossly or repeatedly breaches the Act or rules made under it.

Section 93(1), item 7 of the Radio and Television Act punishes with a fine anyone who disregards a decision to suspend or end programme activity under section 50(2) or (3). Section 9 brought the Order into force on .

What it requires

Executive Order on the duty to keep information on the supply chain when selling accessible products

Bekendtgørelse om pligt til opbevaring af oplysninger om forsyningskæden ved salg af tilgængelige produkter (BEK nr. 823 af 8. juni 2022)Retsinformation, text of BEK nr. 823 af 8. juni 2022 in Danish

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Executive Order 823 of is made under sections 33(2) and 57(2) of the Act on accessibility requirements for products and services. The Order implements parts of Directive (EU) 2019/882, the European Accessibility Act. Section 1 applies the Order to the products covered by section 1(1) of the Act and to the traders who deal in them.

Section 2(1) requires a trader dealing in those products to be able, for a period of 5 years, to give information on every other trader that supplied it with a product or that it supplied with a product. Article 12(2) of the Directive requires economic operators to be able to present that information for five years after they were supplied with the product and for five years after they supplied it.

Section 2(2) requires the information to be given to Sikkerhedsstyrelsen on request under section 33(1) of the Act. The remarks to bill L 8 of the 2026-27 session state that Sikkerhedsstyrelsen merged with the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen) on and is now part of it. Section 3(1) punishes a breach of section 2 with a fine, unless a stricter penalty is incurred under other legislation.

Section 3(2) allows companies and other legal persons to be held criminally liable in accordance with chapter 5 of the Penal Code. Section 4(1) brought the Order into force on , and section 4(2) applies it to products placed on the market from .

What it requires

Procurement conditions

Executive Order on procedures for the award of contracts in the water, energy, transport and postal sectors, section 1, accessibility in technical specifications through Article 60(1) of the Utilities Directive

Bekendtgørelse om fremgangsmåderne ved indgåelse af kontrakter inden for vand- og energiforsyning transport samt posttjenester (BEK nr. 1078 af 29. juni 2022), § 1Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Executive Order 1078 of is made under sections 176(4) and 194(2) of the Public Procurement Act. Section 1(1) of the Order requires contracting entities to comply with the provisions of the Utilities Directive. Section 1(2) defines the Utilities Directive as Directive 2014/25/EU of .

Article 60(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU requires the technical specifications for all procurement intended for use by natural persons, whether the general public or staff of the contracting entity, to take account of accessibility criteria for persons with disabilities or design for all users, except in duly justified cases.

Article 24(1) of Directive 2019/882 makes the accessibility requirements in its Annex I mandatory accessibility requirements within the meaning of Article 60(1) of Directive 2014/25/EU. Section 18(1) of the Public Procurement Act takes contracts covered by Directive 2014/25/EU out of titles II and III of that Act, which hold its section 40. Section 19(1) brought the Order into force on and applies it to tenders under the Utilities Directive started from that day.

Section 52(1) of the Accessibility Act names Executive Order 1624 of alongside section 40(3) of the Public Procurement Act in making the accessibility requirements of its Annex 1 mandatory accessibility requirements. Sections 55(3) and 57(4) of the Accessibility Act also name Order 1624 in taking utilities tender procedures out of that Act’s consumer complaint route and its penalty provisions.

Section 19(2) of Order 1078 repealed Order 1624, and section 19(3) keeps Order 1624 for tenders under the Utilities Directive started before . Section 195(1) of the Public Procurement Act lets a question of breach of rules made under that Act be brought before the Complaints Board for Tenders (Klagenævnet for Udbud).

What it requires

Public Procurement Act (Udbudsloven), section 40, accessibility in the technical specifications of tenders

Udbudsloven (LBK nr. 116 af 3. februar 2025), § 40, stk. 3, og tilgængelighedsloven § 52, stk. 1Retsinformation

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 40(1) of the Public Procurement Act (udbudsloven) requires a contracting authority to state the technical specifications in the tender documents. Section 40(3), first sentence, requires the technical specifications for all procurement intended for use by natural persons to be drawn up, except in duly justified cases, with regard to accessibility for persons with disabilities or design for all users.

Section 40(3), second sentence, requires accessibility requirements that are mandatory by virtue of EU rules to be set by reference to those rules. Section 52(1) of the Accessibility Act makes the accessibility requirements in Annex 1 to that Act mandatory accessibility requirements within section 40(3) of the Public Procurement Act.

Article 24(1) of Directive 2019/882 makes the accessibility requirements in its Annex I mandatory accessibility requirements within the meaning of Article 42(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU.

Section 52(2) of the Accessibility Act deems a product or service whose functionalities, elements and functions meet the relevant requirements in Annex 1 and conform with part 6 of that Annex to meet the corresponding obligations in Danish law that arise from EU acts other than the Accessibility Directive, as regards accessibility of those functionalities, elements and functions, unless those acts provide otherwise.

Title II of the Public Procurement Act, which holds section 40, applies to contracts at or above the value thresholds in section 6, tiered by the type of contract and of contracting authority. Section 9 requires contracting authorities to apply the thresholds in force at the time, which the European Commission revises every second year.

Section 195(1) lets anyone with a legal interest, or a right of complaint under the Act on the Complaints Board for Tenders, bring a question of breach of the Public Procurement Act or of rules made under it before the Complaints Board for Tenders (Klagenævnet for Udbud).

Under section 7(1) of the Act on the Complaints Board for Tenders, a complaint by an undertaking that it was not selected in a restricted procedure, a competitive procedure with negotiation, a competitive dialogue or an innovation partnership must be filed within 20 calendar days of the day after the notice of who was selected was sent.

Section 7(2) of that Act sets the time limits for other complaints about tenders under titles II and III, including 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Section 13(1) of that Act lets the Board suspend the contracting authority’s procedure or decisions, annul its unlawful decisions, order it to bring the procedure into line with the rules, or impose an economic sanction on it.

Sections 16 and 17 of that Act let or require the Board to declare a contract ineffective in the cases they list. Section 55(3) of the Accessibility Act takes tender procedures under the Public Procurement Act out of that Act’s consumer complaint route. Section 57(4) of the Accessibility Act takes those tender procedures out of its penalty provisions. Section 196(1) brought the Public Procurement Act into force on .

What it requires

Age gating law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (146 words)

Denmark has no adult-content age-verification statute, social-media minor-access restriction, or app-store age-verification requirement addressed to a developer or platform outside the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive framework.

Denmark's own addition to that EU baseline is sections 51a to 51c of Lov om radio- og fjernsynsvirksomhed m.v., inserted by Lov nr. 805 af 9. juni 2020 with effect from , which requires a video-sharing platform provider under Danish jurisdiction to register with Radio- og tv-naevnet and comply with ministerial rules on measures to protect minors and the public from harmful content, including content depicting child sexual abuse as defined by Straffeloven section 235.

The specific measures a provider must take are set by ministerial regulation under those provisions, not by the Act itself. The digital age of consent for a minor's own personal data is addressed under the privacy topic and is not restated here.

Adult content age verification (AV)

Radio- og fjernsynsloven Sections 51a-51c, Video-Sharing Platform Minor Protection

Lov om radio- og fjernsynsvirksomhed m.v., sections 51 a-51 c (Videodelingsplatformstjenester), inserted by Lov nr. 805 af 9. juni 2020Lov om radio- og fjernsynsvirksomhed m.v., official text of the amending act, Retsinformation.dk

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

A provider of a video-sharing platform service under Danish jurisdiction must register with Radio- og tv-naevnet. The Culture Minister sets rules requiring such a provider to take appropriate measures to protect minors from harmful content, and rules that a minor's personal data collected or generated by the provider may not be processed for commercial purposes.

The Culture Minister separately sets rules requiring such a provider to take appropriate measures to protect the public from content that incites violence or hatred, or whose spread is a criminal offence: public incitement to terrorism, child pornography under Straffeloven section 235, or racism and xenophobia. Radio- og tv-naevnet registers providers, supervises them and prosecutes violations of the Act and of rules made under it.

Radio- og tv-naevnet may decide to stop a provider's activity, temporarily or permanently, for a gross or repeated violation.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (120 words)

Denmark transposed the EU Digital Single Market Copyright Directive's press-publisher neighbouring right through Ophavsretsloven section 69a, inserted by Lov nr. 1121 af 4. juni 2021, which entered into force : an information-society service provider may not reproduce a press publication online or make it available to the public without the publisher's consent, for 2 years after the end of the year the publication appeared.

Denmark's text-and-data-mining exception, Ophavsretsloven sections 11b and 11c, applies unless the rightholder has reserved the use. Denmark has no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime comparable to Australia's News Media Bargaining Code or Canada's Online News Act. No hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary law, and no Danish case law construing section 69a, is identified.

Press publishers' right

Ophavsretsloven Section 69a, Press Publisher Right

Ophavsretsloven section 69 a (Udgivere af pressepublikationer), Lovbekendtgorelse nr. 1093 af 20. august 2023, inserted by Lov nr. 1121 af 4. juni 2021Ophavsretsloven, official consolidated text, Retsinformation.dk

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

A press publication may not be reproduced online, or made available to the public at a place and time individually chosen by them, by a provider of an information-society service without the publisher's consent, until 2 years have elapsed after the end of the year the publication or announcement occurred. The right does not apply to a press publication first published or announced before , regardless of any later use after the provision's own entry into force.

The right applies to press publications published by publishers whose head office is in a European Economic Area country. The right does not apply to individual users' private or non-commercial use, to hyperlinks, or to single words or very short extracts of a press publication, per paragraph 2 of section 69 a. Authors of works in a press publication are entitled to an appropriate share of the revenue the publisher receives for that use, per paragraph 4 of section 69 a.

What it requires

Case law

  • No current case law for Denmark AI law
  • No current case law for Denmark privacy law
  • No current case law for Denmark scraping law
  • No current case law for Denmark cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Denmark communications law
  • No current case law for Denmark content moderation law
  • No current case law for Denmark product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Denmark digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Denmark age gating law
  • No current case law for Denmark reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here22 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Denmark comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

48 hours
Serious-incident reporthigh-risk AI law
72 hours
10 days
Serious-incident reporthigh-risk AI law
14 days
Final reportsecurity law
15 days
Serious-incident reporthigh-risk AI law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Denmark

24 hours72 hours1 month

Act on Security and Preparedness in the Telecoms Sector (Lov om sikkerhed og beredskab i telesektoren), Significant Incident Notification

Lov nr. 435 af 6. maj 2025, §§ 8, 9 og 11security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the Danish Agency for Societal Security and the computer security incident response team (CSIRT) of every significant incident: an early warning without undue delay and within 24 hours of becoming aware of it, stating whether it is suspected to be caused by unlawful or malicious acts or could have a cross-border effect; an incident notification within 72 hours; an interim report when the authority asks; and a final report within one month of the incident notification, or, if the incident is still ongoing, a status report then and a final report within one month of the incident being handled (Sections 8(2) and 9(1)).

Tell the recipients of your services, without undue delay and to the relevant extent, when a significant incident is likely to affect their service negatively, and tell recipients potentially affected by a significant cyber threat of any measures they can take in response (Section 11).

24 hours72 hours1 month

NIS 2-loven, Significant-Incident Reporting and Recipient-Notice Duties

NIS 2-loven, §§ 12-13, 15security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Send an early warning without undue delay, and no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the significant incident, stating whether it is suspected to result from an unlawful or malicious act and whether it may have a cross-border effect.

Follow with a notification, without undue delay and in any case within 72 hours of becoming aware of the incident, updating the early warning with an initial assessment of the incident's severity and impact, including any indicators of compromise where available.

Submit an interim report if your computer security incident response team (CSIRT) asks for one, and a final report no later than one month after your notification, describing the incident in detail, its severity and impact, the likely threat or root cause, mitigating measures applied and under way, and any cross-border effects. If the incident is still ongoing at that point, submit a status report instead and the final report within one month of the incident being handled.

If you are a trust-service provider, send the notification described in the previous step without undue delay and no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the significant incident, rather than within 72 hours.

Notify the recipients of your service, without undue delay, of a significant incident likely to adversely affect the delivery of your service to them, and inform any recipient potentially affected by a significant cyber threat of the measures or countermeasures they can take in response, and of the threat itself where relevant.

72 hours

GDPR Articles 33-34, Breach Notification in Denmark

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 33-34privacy law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify Datatilsynet without undue delay, and within 72 hours where feasible, after becoming aware of a personal data breach affecting a person in Denmark, unless the breach is unlikely to risk their rights and freedoms.

If you process personal data on behalf of a controller, notify the controller without undue delay after becoming aware of a personal data breach (Article 33(2)).

Notify affected individuals without undue delay where a breach is likely to result in a high risk to their rights and freedoms.

The law of the European Union, which applies in Denmark

4 hours

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1366, Cybersecurity Network Code for Cross-Border Electricity Flows: Information Sharing on Cyber-Attacks and Threats

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1366, Art. 38security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Share relevant information related to a reportable cyber-attack with your computer security incident response teams (CSIRTs) and your competent authority without undue delay and no later than four hours of becoming aware that the incident is reportable; a cyber-attack is reportable when you assess its criticality as ranging from high to critical on the classification scale methodology under Article 37(8) (Article 38(3) and (4)).

Provide your computer security incident response teams (CSIRTs) without undue delay with any information related to a reportable cyber threat that may have a cross-border effect (Article 38(6)).

4 hours24 hours72 hours1 month

DORA, Article 19 (reporting of major ICT-related incidents), with the time limits of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/301

Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Article 19security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Report a major ICT-related incident to the competent authority your sector's Union law designates under Article 46, the European Central Bank through your national supervisor if you are a credit institution classified as significant, using the templates referred to in Article 20, and submit an initial notification as early as possible and in any case within four hours of classifying the incident as major, and no later than 24 hours from becoming aware of it.

Where classification as major comes later than that, submit the initial notification within four hours of the classification instead.

Submit an intermediate report within 72 hours of the initial notification, and submit an updated intermediate report without undue delay and in any case when you have recovered regular activities.

Submit a final report no later than one month after the intermediate report, or your latest updated one, once you know the root cause and the actual impact figures.

If you cannot meet one of those deadlines, tell the competent authority without undue delay and before the deadline lapses, explaining why. A deadline falling on a weekend or bank holiday moves to noon of the next working day, unless you are a credit institution, a central counterparty, a trading venue operator, or an entity your Member State has designated essential or important under the NIS2 Directive, none of which get that extension for an initial notification or intermediate report.

Your competent authority may also decide, and notify you, that the extension does not apply to you if you are a financial entity that is significant or has a systemic character for the financial sector at national or Union level.

Notifying a significant cyber threat under Article 19(2) is voluntary, only where you judge it relevant to the financial system, service users, or your clients. Where a major ICT-related incident affects your clients' financial interests, tell them without undue delay as soon as you become aware of it, describing the incident and the mitigation measures you took, and, for a significant cyber threat, tell a potentially affected client of protection measures it could take, where applicable.

24 hours3 days

Commission Regulation on Personal Data Breach Notification by Electronic Communications Providers (Regulation (EU) No 611/2013)

Regulation (EU) No 611/2013privacy law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

If you provide a publicly available electronic communications service, notify every personal data breach to the competent national authority (Article 2(1)), no later than 24 hours after its detection, where feasible, with the information set out in Annex I; detection is deemed to have taken place when you have acquired sufficient awareness that a security incident has occurred that led to personal data being compromised (Article 2(2)).

Where all the information in Annex I is not available and further investigation is required, you may make an initial notification no later than 24 hours after detection containing the information in Section 1 of Annex I, and you must then make a second notification as soon as possible and at the latest within three days following the initial notification, containing the information in Section 2 of Annex I (Article 2(3)).

If you cannot provide all the information within the three-day period, notify as much as you have within it, submit to the competent national authority a reasoned justification for the late notification of the remaining information, and notify the remaining information as soon as possible (Article 2(3)).

Notify the subscriber or individual without undue delay after detection of the breach, whether or not you have yet notified the competent national authority (Article 3(3)).

If you have a direct contractual relationship with the end user and, despite reasonable efforts, cannot identify within the timeframe all the individuals likely to be adversely affected, you may notify them through advertisements in major national or regional media in the relevant Member States within that timeframe, containing the Annex II information where necessary in a condensed form, and you must continue all reasonable efforts to identify and notify them as soon as possible (Article 3(7)).

If you are contracted to deliver part of the electronic communications service without a direct contractual relationship with subscribers, immediately inform the contracting provider in the case of a personal data breach (Article 5).

24 hours72 hours14 days1 month

Cyber Resilience Act, Manufacturer Reporting Obligations

Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, Art. 14security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the computer security incident response team (CSIRT) designated as coordinator for your main establishment and ENISA, through the single reporting platform, of any actively exploited vulnerability you become aware of in your product: an early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware, a vulnerability notification within 72 hours, and a final report no later than 14 days after a corrective or mitigating measure becomes available, the notification and the final report each unless the relevant information has already been provided.

Notify the same recipients of any severe incident affecting the security of your product on the same 24-hour early warning and 72-hour incident notification clock, followed by a final report within one month of the incident notification; the incident notification and the final report each apply unless the relevant information has already been provided. For either an exploited vulnerability or a severe incident, give the computer security incident response team (CSIRT) an intermediate report on relevant status updates if it asks for one.

24 hours72 hours1 month

NIS2 Directive, Reporting Obligations

Directive (EU) 2022/2555, Art. 23security law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify your computer security incident response team (CSIRT), or the competent authority where applicable, of any incident with a significant impact on the provision of your services: an early warning within 24 hours of becoming aware, an incident notification within 72 hours of becoming aware (24 hours if you are a trust service provider), an intermediate report on relevant status updates if your CSIRT or competent authority asks for one, and a final report no later than one month after the incident notification, or, for an incident still ongoing at that point, a progress report then and a final report within one month of its handling.

Where appropriate, notify, without undue delay, the recipients of your services who a significant incident is likely to adversely affect, and communicate to recipients potentially affected by a significant cyber threat any measures or remedies they can take.

48 hours

AI Act, Article 26(10) (post-remote biometric identification authorisation)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 26(10)high-risk AI law, not yet in force, from

The sentence the clocks are read from

If you are a law enforcement deployer using a high-risk AI system for post-remote biometric identification in a targeted search for a suspected or convicted person, request authorisation from a judicial authority or a binding, judicially reviewable administrative authority, in advance or without undue delay and no later than 48 hours, unless you are using the system only for the initial identification of a potential suspect on objective and verifiable facts directly linked to the offence.

2 days10 days15 days

AI Act, Article 73 (reporting of serious incidents)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 73high-risk AI law, not yet in force, from

The sentences the clocks are read from

Report a serious incident not later than 15 days after you become aware of it, or immediately once you establish a causal link between your AI system and the incident, or the reasonable likelihood of one, whichever is sooner.

Report immediately, and not later than 2 days after becoming aware of it, a widespread infringement or a serious incident causing a serious and irreversible disruption to the management or operation of critical infrastructure.

Report a serious incident involving the death of a person not later than 10 days after becoming aware of it, and immediately once you establish, or suspect, a causal link between your AI system and the incident.

If you are a deployer of a high-risk AI system and identify a serious incident, Article 26(5) requires you to immediately inform first the provider, then the importer or distributor, and the relevant market surveillance authority; if you cannot reach the provider, report the incident yourself under the same rules that bind a provider. This does not require you to disclose sensitive operational data if you are a law enforcement authority.

After reporting a serious incident, without delay investigate it, including a risk assessment and corrective action, and cooperate with the competent authorities; do not alter the AI system in a way that could affect the investigation before telling the authorities.

2 days10 days15 days

AI Act, Articles 60 and 61 (testing in real world conditions outside AI regulatory sandboxes, with informed consent)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Articles 60 and 61high-risk AI law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Let a subject, or the subject's legally designated representative, withdraw from the testing at any time by revoking informed consent, without detriment and without having to provide any justification, and on request delete the subject's personal data immediately and permanently; the withdrawal does not affect the activities already carried out (Article 60(5)).

Report any serious incident identified in the course of the testing to the national market surveillance authority in accordance with Article 73, which requires the report immediately after a causal link, or the reasonable likelihood of one, is established and in any event not later than 15 days after you become aware of the incident, not later than two days for a widespread infringement or a serious and irreversible disruption of the management or operation of critical infrastructure, and not later than 10 days after you become aware of it where a person has died (Article 60(7)).

72 hours

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1645, External Reporting of Information Security Incidents and Vulnerabilities (IS.D.OR.230)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1645, IS.D.OR.230security law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Submit a notification as soon as you know of the condition, and a report as soon as possible and not exceeding 72 hours from the time you know of it unless exceptional circumstances prevent this, in the form your competent authority defines (point IS.D.OR.230(c), points (1) and (2)).

72 hours

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/203, External Reporting of Information Security Incidents and Vulnerabilities in Aviation (IS.I.OR.230)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/203, IS.I.OR.230security law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Submit a notification as soon as you know of the condition, and a report as soon as possible and not exceeding 72 hours from the time you know of it unless exceptional circumstances prevent this, in the form your competent authority defines (point IS.I.OR.230(c), points (1) and (2)).

3 days

European Health Data Space Regulation, Serious-Incident Reporting by Manufacturers of EHR Systems

Regulation (EU) 2025/327, Art. 44(7)security law, not yet in force, from

The sentence the clocks are read from

Make the report immediately after you have established a causal link between the EHR system and the serious incident or the reasonable likelihood of such a link and, in any event, not later than three days after you become aware of the serious incident (Article 44(7)).

immediately

AI Act, Article 20 (corrective actions and duty of information)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 20high-risk AI law, not yet in force, from

The sentence the clocks are read from

Where the system presents a risk to the health or safety, or to fundamental rights, of persons within the meaning of Article 79(1) and you become aware of that risk, immediately investigate the causes, in collaboration with the reporting deployer where applicable, and inform the market surveillance authorities competent for the system and, where applicable, the notified body that issued its certificate under Article 44, in particular of the nature of the non-compliance and of any relevant corrective action taken.

immediately

AI Act, Article 22 (authorised representative of a provider established in a third country: appointment, mandate, tasks and termination)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 22(1), (2), (3) except points (b) and (c), and (4)high-risk AI law, not yet in force, from

The sentence the clocks are read from

Terminate the mandate if you consider or have reason to consider that the provider is acting contrary to its obligations under the Regulation, and immediately inform the relevant market surveillance authority and, where applicable, the relevant notified body of the termination and the reasons for it (Article 22(4)).

without undue delay

AI Act, Article 26(1) to (5) (deployer use, human oversight, input data and monitoring)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 26(1) to (5)high-risk AI law, not yet in force, from

The sentences the clocks are read from

Where you have reason to consider that using the system per its instructions may present a risk to health, safety or fundamental rights, inform the provider or distributor and the relevant market surveillance authority without undue delay, and suspend use of the system.

Where you have identified a serious incident, immediately inform first the provider, then the importer or distributor and the relevant market surveillance authorities; if you cannot reach the provider, report the incident yourself as Article 73 requires of a provider.

without undue delay

AI Act, Article 55 (obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk)

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 55frontier-model AI law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

Keep track of, document, and report to the AI Office, and as appropriate to national competent authorities, without undue delay, relevant information about serious incidents involving your model and any corrective measures you have taken or plan to take. The Regulation states no fixed number of days for this report and no explicit moment its clock starts from, only that it must be made without undue delay.

without undue delay

ePrivacy Directive, Article 4(3) to (5), Personal Data Breach Notification

Directive 2002/58/EC, Art. 4(3)-(5)privacy law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

If you provide a publicly available electronic communications service and a personal data breach occurs, notify the breach to the competent national authority without undue delay (Article 4(3)).

Where the breach is likely to adversely affect the personal data or privacy of a subscriber or individual, also notify that subscriber or individual of the breach without undue delay (Article 4(3)).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.