Law / Angola

Angola

14 of 18 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 14 in force. As of .

When each starts11 of 14 carry a date, 3 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 6 instruments (6 in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 3 instruments (3 in force) 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 2 instruments (2 in force) ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 0 instruments 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 0 instruments 2026: 0 instruments ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law 1
  2. Privacy law 6
  3. Scraping law 1
  4. Cybersecurity law 5
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

AI law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (172 words)

Angola has no general AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligations, AI-training-data, or AI-governance statute in force.

A Draft Law on Artificial Intelligence, 86 articles prepared by the Ministry of Telecommunications, Information Technologies and Social Communication (MINTTICS) and presented to the National Assembly in September 2025, would create a risk-based framework with developer and deployer duties, content-labelling requirements, and extraterritorial reach, but it remained under legislative review as of with no plenary passage, promulgation, or Diário da República publication located.

A 2025 draft amendment to the Personal Data Protection Law would add a chapter on AI-based personal-data processing but likewise remained an unenacted proposal.

The Penal Code (Lei n.º 38/20, de 11 de Novembro de 2020), Article 198, does reach one AI-adjacent conduct now in force: its child-pornography offence defines the prohibited material to include a depiction of a real or virtual person appearing to be a minor, which on its face criminalises an AI-generated or synthetic depiction of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct, independent of whether any real child was involved.

AI prohibited practices

Penal Code, Child Pornography Including a Virtual or Simulated Minor

Código Penal de Angola, art. 198.º (Pornografia Infantil), Lei n.º 38/20 de 11 de Novembro de 2020Text of Lei n.º 38/20 (Código Penal de Angola), reproduced by AngoLex

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 198(2) punishes with imprisonment of two to ten years a person who produces child pornography to be spread through an information system, or who offers, makes available, disseminates, or transmits it through an information system.

Article 198(5)(a) defines 'child pornography' for this purpose as any material that visually or aurally represents a minor under 18, or a person, real or virtual, appearing to be a minor under 18, engaged in sexually explicit conduct or conduct that incites such conduct. Because the definition expressly reaches a 'virtual' person merely appearing to be a minor, the offence covers a wholly synthetic, AI-generated depiction with no real child involved, not only material derived from a real child.

Article 198(1) separately punishes conduct that exposes a minor under 18 to obscene material or uses or procures a minor for pornographic photography, film, or recording. Article 198(3) punishes acquiring, possessing, or facilitating access to child-pornography material by any means with imprisonment of one to five years. Article 198(4) raises the penalty to three to ten years where the actor makes a profession or profit of the conduct described.

Lei n.º 38/20's own Article 9 has the Penal Code enter into force ninety days after the Law's publication in the Official Gazette's Diário da República Iª Série n.º 179 of ; no source stating the resulting day has been located.

What it requires

Privacy law6 instruments, 6 in force

Research summary (189 words)

Angola's comprehensive data-protection statute is Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), approved by the National Assembly on and promulgated on , enforced by the Agência de Protecção de Dados (APD).

The law binds any person or entity in the public, private, or cooperative sector that processes personal data, conditions most processing on the data subject's express consent or notification to the APD, arms the data subject with rights of access, rectification, and objection, restricts cross-border transfer to states offering an adequate level of protection, and backs its duties with administrative fines and, for unauthorised access and related conduct, criminal penalties.

Its sensitive-data category (Article 5(c)) reaches philosophical or political convictions, party or union membership, religious faith, private life, racial or ethnic origin, and health and sex life including genetic data; it does not name a biometric identifier such as a voiceprint or faceprint as a sensitive category, so a service processing a biometric identifier not otherwise tied to one of those named categories falls under the law's ordinary consent and notification duties rather than its heightened prior-authorization regime for sensitive data.

Comprehensive regime

Law on the Protection of Personal Data

Lei n.º 22/11, de 17 de Junho de 2011 (Protecção de Dados Pessoais), arts. 1-12, 16, 18-24, 30-32, 35-43 and 63-67Text of Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), reproduced by AngoLex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 3 subjects to the law any processing of personal data by any person or entity in the public, private, or cooperative sector, including a controller not established in Angola who uses means located there.

Article 12 requires the data subject's unequivocal, express consent before most processing, or notification to the APD, unless the processing falls under one of Article 12's enumerated exceptions such as contract performance, a legal obligation, vital interests, a public interest mission, or the controller's legitimate interest.

Article 16 conditions processing of credit and solvency data on the data subject's consent or the APD's authorisation unless the information comes from a publicly accessible source, and requires the data subject to be notified within sixty days once their data enters a debtor file.

Articles 18 to 20 require notification to the APD, or the recipient's consent, before sending postal or electronic marketing messages or recording a call for commercial purposes, and require the sender to let the recipient object to further messages at any time free of charge.

Articles 21 to 24 allocate responsibility for communicated data between the discloser, a fellow controller, a subcontractor acting on the discloser's behalf and instructions, or a third party, and require the APD's authorisation for interconnecting personal data held in different files unless a legal provision already permits it.

Article 30 requires technical and organisational measures adequate to the risks presented by the processing and the nature of the data, documented in a security procedures record, and Article 32 binds a data controller and anyone who learns of the data in the course of their duties to professional secrecy, including after those duties end.

Articles 35 to 38 require notification to the APD, or its authorisation where notification is not enough, before processing personal data, fix the particulars a notification or authorisation request must contain, and require processing subject to authorisation or notification to appear in a public APD register.

Articles 39 to 43 apply this law to the public sector subject to further rules on creating, modifying and eliminating files and on inter-agency data sharing, and to the private and cooperative sectors subject to further legislation for specific activities.

Article 67 enters the law into force on the date of its publication, the Official Gazette's Diário da República Iª Série n.º 114 of , following approval by the National Assembly on and promulgation by the President on .

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Law on the Protection of Personal Data, cross border transfer

Lei n.º 22/11, de 17 de Junho de 2011, arts. 33-34 (transferência internacional de dados)Text of Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), reproduced by AngoLex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 33 subjects the international transfer of personal data to a country that ensures a level of protection at least equal to this law's to notification to the APD, which decides whether a state provides that level by weighing the nature of the data, the purpose and duration of the processing, the destination country, and the legal, professional and security rules in force there.

Article 34 conditions transfer of personal data to a country that does not ensure an adequate level of protection on the APD's authorisation, granted only where the data subject has given unequivocal, express and written consent, an international treaty or agreement to which Angola is party applies, the transfer answers a humanitarian aid request, the transfer is necessary for a contract with or for the benefit of the data subject, the transfer serves an important public interest or a legal claim, the transfer protects the data subject's vital interests where they cannot consent, the data originates from a publicly accessible source, or the recipient contractually guarantees the transferred data an adequate level of protection on terms the APD sets.

Article 34 also lets a group of companies satisfy the adequate protection requirement for transfers between them through binding uniform internal rules on privacy and data protection.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Law on the Protection of Personal Data, automated decisions

Lei n.º 22/11, de 17 de Junho de 2011, art. 29 (automated individual decisions)Text of Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), reproduced by AngoLex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 29 gives every person the right not to be subject to a decision that produces legal effects on them or significantly affects them, taken solely on automated processing of data intended to evaluate personal aspects of their character, in particular their professional capacity, creditworthiness, trustworthiness or conduct.

Paragraph 2 allows such a decision where it is taken in forming or performing a contract at the data subject's own request and adequate measures safeguard their legitimate interests, including a right of representation and expression. Paragraph 3 also allows it where the Agência de Protecção de Dados has authorized it, defining measures that safeguard the data subject's legitimate interests.

What it requires

Law on the Protection of Personal Data, rights of data subjects

Lei n.º 22/11, de 17 de Junho de 2011, arts. 25-28 (direitos dos titulares dos dados)Text of Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), reproduced by AngoLex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 25 requires the controller to give a data subject at least the controller's identity and address, the purposes of processing and the file created for it, the recipients or categories of recipients, whether replying is mandatory or voluntary and the consequences of not replying, and the existence and conditions of the rights of access, rectification, updating, elimination and objection, at the time of collection or, where the data came from elsewhere, at the latest thirty days after collection, in language that is clear, precise and objective for a minor or a person with special needs.

Article 25 treats the right to information as fulfilled, for data collected over open networks, by publishing an easily accessible privacy policy carrying that same information together with a warning that personal data may circulate on the network without security guarantees and risk being seen or used by unauthorised third parties.

Article 26 gives a data subject the right to obtain from the controller, freely and without restriction, delay or excessive cost, confirmation of whether their data are processed, the purposes and categories of that processing, the recipients, the specific data itself, and any available information on its origin, and lets a data subject exercise access to health or sex-life data, including genetic data, through a doctor of their choice.

Article 27 lets a data subject object at any time, on compelling and legitimate grounds tied to their particular situation, to processing carried out under Article 12's public-interest or legitimate-interest grounds, obliging the controller to exclude their data from that processing once the objection is justified.

Article 28 requires the controller to rectify, update or eliminate a data subject's personal data within sixty business days of a request where its processing does not comply with this law, and to notify any recipient the data were previously disclosed to of the correction, update or elimination, unless that is demonstrably impossible.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Law on the Protection of Personal Data, enforcement and supervision

Lei n.º 22/11, de 17 de Junho de 2011, arts. 44-62 (Agência de Protecção de Dados, contravenções e crimes)Text of Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), reproduced by AngoLex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 44 establishes the Agência de Protecção de Dados as a public legal person with administrative, financial and asset autonomy, composed of seven members, three designated by the President of the Republic including the Agency's President, three elected by the National Assembly, and one judicial magistrate elected by the Superior Council of Judicial Magistracy, and gives it functions including supervising this law, issuing guidance, deciding complaints, registering and publishing processing files, cooperating internationally, exercising its sanctioning function, and reporting annually to the Executive.

Article 46 lets the APD stimulate, register, and reject codes of conduct that conflict with this law. Article 47 lets any person pursue an administrative or judicial remedy for a breach of this law's rules in addition to a complaint to the APD, and makes an APD decision appealable through administrative litigation. Article 48 entitles a person who suffers moral or patrimonial harm from misuse of their personal data to seek judicial reparation, with the judge setting the harm's value.

Article 51 fines a violation of Articles 14 to 17, 20, 30, 31 or 32 from USD 75,000 to USD 150,000, and a violation of Articles 6 to 11's principles, the consent requirement, or Articles 18, 19 and 21 to 24 from USD 65,000 to USD 130,000, tripling the applicable limits for a company, corporation or unincorporated association, and makes both attempt and negligence punishable.

Article 55 makes omitting a required APD authorisation request, giving false information in a notification or authorisation request, an illegal data interconnection, or missing an APD compliance deadline a crime punishable by three to eighteen months' imprisonment or a corresponding fine, doubled for Article 13 to 16 sensitive data.

Article 56 makes unauthorised access to personal data whose access is barred to the actor a crime punishable by six months to two years' imprisonment or a corresponding fine, aggravated for defeating security rules or for a benefit, and prosecuted only on complaint.

Article 57 makes erasing, destroying, damaging, suppressing or modifying personal data without authorisation a crime punishable by eighteen months to three years' imprisonment or a corresponding fine, doubled for particularly serious damage, or up to two years for negligence. Article 58 makes failing to interrupt, cease or block processing after APD notice, or otherwise disobeying an APD requirement, a crime punishable by up to three years' imprisonment or a corresponding fine.

Article 59 makes violating the duty of professional secrecy over personal data a crime punishable by up to eighteen months' imprisonment or a corresponding fine, rising to two years for a public official, a financial-gain motive, or harm to the data subject's reputation, honour or privacy.

Article 61 lets a court add, alongside a fine, a temporary or permanent processing ban, an order to block, erase or destroy data, or publication of the conviction at the convicted party's expense in a widely circulated periodical.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Law on the Protection of Personal Data, sensitive data categories

Lei n.º 22/11, de 17 de Junho de 2011, arts. 13-15 e 17 (dados sensíveis)Text of Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei da Protecção de Dados Pessoais), reproduced by AngoLex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 13 subjects the processing of sensitive data, defined as philosophical or political convictions, party or union membership, religious faith, private life, racial or ethnic origin, and health and sex life including genetic data, to a legal provision that permits it or to the APD's authorisation, which the APD may grant only where the data subject or their legal representative has given unequivocal, express and written consent, a nonprofit political, philosophical, religious or trade union body processes only its own members' or regular contacts' data with their consent, the data subject was physically or legally unable to consent and processing protects vital interests, the data subject has manifestly made the data public, the processing serves the establishment, exercise or defence of a right in judicial proceedings, or the processing is indispensable to a public authority's legal or statutory functions including judicial, police or administrative investigation.

Article 13 further requires sensitive data processed under a legal provision to be notified to the APD and carried out with guarantees of non-discrimination and special security measures.

Article 14 permits processing of health and sex-life data, including genetic data, only with the data subject's or their legal representative's unequivocal, express and written consent or the APD's authorisation, unless the processing serves preventive medicine, medical diagnosis, consented medical care, health-service management or statistics, a medical emergency, or the public interest, and only through a health professional bound by professional secrecy.

Article 15 permits processing of data on persons suspected of illicit activities, criminal offences, contraventions, and applicable penalties, security measures, fines or accessory sanctions only by a public authority, under a legal provision cleared with the APD's prior opinion or under the APD's own authorisation, and limits processing for police investigation purposes to what a determined offence's prevention or repression requires.

Article 17 subjects the installation of video surveillance systems and other means of capturing, processing and disseminating sound and images that permit identifying people, including electronic road surveillance systems, to Article 13's regime, and requires the controller to post notice at any location carrying such a system of its existence, of the capture of sound and image, and of the controller's name, address, phone number and email.

What it requires

Scraping law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (171 words)

Angola has no scraping-specific statute.

Article 438 of the Penal Code (Lei n.º 38/20, de 11 de Novembro de 2020) criminalises unauthorised access to all or part of an information system one does not own, without the access-context distinctions (public unauthenticated page, robots.txt, behind login, ToS acceptance) that some jurisdictions' case law draws; the base offence does not require defeating a security measure, though a heavier tier applies where the access is achieved that way or targets a service with conditional access.

Lei n.º 7/17 (Lei de Protecção das Redes e Sistemas Informáticos) imposes security and data-retention duties on network and information-society-service operators and critical-infrastructure providers, backed by administrative fines, but its own Article 44 refers computer-crime liability, including unauthorised access, to the Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure rather than creating a second criminal offence, so it does not itself reach a scraper's conduct.

No primary source located addresses terms-of-service enforceability, a text-and-data-mining copyright exception, a sui generis database right, robots.txt's legal weight, or an AI-training-specific rule for Angola.

Computer misuse

Penal Code, Unauthorised Access to an Information System

Código Penal de Angola, art. 438.º (Acesso Ilegítimo a Sistema de Informação), Lei n.º 38/20 de 11 de Novembro de 2020Text of Lei n.º 38/20 (Código Penal de Angola), reproduced by AngoLex

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 438(1) punishes any person who, without authorisation, accesses all or part of an information system of which they are not the holder, with imprisonment of up to two years or a fine of up to 240 days.

Article 438(2) raises the penalty to imprisonment of two to eight years where the access is achieved by defeating security measures, or is directed at a 'serviço protegido' (a service whose access is conditional on a subscription or other prior individual authorisation, as Lei n.º 7/17 art. 4(a) defines the term).

Article 438(3) applies the same heavier tier where the actor learns a commercial or industrial secret or confidential data protected by law, or obtains a benefit or advantage of elevated value. Article 438(4) extends the base penalty to a person who, without due authorisation, processes individually identifiable data or transmits it to a third party for a purpose other than the one authorised.

Article 437 defines 'sistema informático' broadly as any device or set of interconnected devices that automates the processing of computer data, together with the network supporting communication between them.

The offence draws no distinction based on whether the accessed system or page is public and unauthenticated, so a plain reading exposes web crawling that accesses a system without the holder's authorisation, regardless of whether a technical barrier was defeated, though the enhanced tier under Article 438(2) requires either a security-measure violation or a conditional-access service.

Lei n.º 7/17 (Lei de Protecção das Redes e Sistemas Informáticos) imposes separate security and data-retention duties on network operators, but its own Article 44 states that, for information systems and data, subsidiarily the legal regime provided by the criminal legislation and criminal procedure legislation in force applies, referring unauthorised-access liability back to this Penal Code article rather than creating a second offence.

Lei n.º 38/20's own Article 9 has the Penal Code enter into force ninety days after the Law's publication in the Official Gazette's Diário da República Iª Série n.º 179 of ; no source stating the resulting day has been located.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law5 instruments, 5 in force

Research summary (520 words)

Angola's dedicated cybersecurity statute is Lei n.º 7/17, Lei de Protecção das Redes e Sistemas Informáticos (Law on the Protection of Networks and Information Systems), approved by the National Assembly on and promulgated by the President on ; Article 47 states it enters into force on the date of its publication.

Article 1 sets the Law's object as establishing the legal regime on measures for the protection of networks and information systems, and Article 2 applies it to Angola's cyberspace against any act of attack, computer theft, cyber-attack and computer incidents, with an extraterritorial reach whose paragraph 2(a) requires a legal person's domicile in Angola but whose paragraph 2(d) names only a foreign citizen, not a foreign legal person, with no residence requirement.

Chapter II Section I (Articles 6 through 11) binds operators and service providers of public electronic-communications networks to network-security, encryption, incident-response and security-management duties, and Article 7 separately assigns operators and service providers of critical infrastructure a duty to secure the assets essential to critical social functions.

Chapter II Section II (Articles 12 through 14 and 17) and Section III (Articles 18 and 19) bind a provider, operator or service provider of an information-society system, a class Article 4(ff) defines as broadly as the EU's information-society-service concept (any service normally provided at a distance, by electronic means, at the individual request of a recipient), to the equivalent security duties plus specialised protection rules for computer programs and databases; that class reaches well beyond a social platform.

Articles 15, 16, 40 and 41 add a pre-activity incident-management-plan filing duty, an alert-dissemination duty on attack or incident, and a central coordinating role for the CERT-equivalent Equipa de Monitorização e Respostas aos Incidentes Informáticos; these articles state no reporting clock, and Article 40 leaves the team's own organisation and reporting channel to a decree.

Chapter V Article 42 punishes non-compliance with Articles 12 through 19 with a contravenção (an administrative infraction, not a criminal penalty) of Kz 7,000,000 to Kz 150,000,000, enforced by the Agência de Protecção de Dados Pessoais; Articles 6 through 11 and Article 7 carry no fine under Article 42 at all.

No article of Lei n.º 7/17 sets a security requirement a software product or connected device must meet before being placed on the market, nor a support-period, update or vulnerability-disclosure-channel duty on a manufacturer as such.

Angola also has no general, no-sector-gate reasonable-security statute reaching any business that holds covered data; Lei n.º 7/17's duties are scoped to communications and information-society-service providers rather than to a business by reason of the data it holds.

Two nearby security clauses stay with the privacy topic rather than being held twice here: Lei n.º 22/11 (Lei de Protecção de Dados Pessoais) Articles 30 and 31, the comprehensive privacy law's own security-of-processing and special-security-measures articles, and Lei n.º 23/11 (Lei das Comunicações Electrónicas e dos Serviços da Sociedade de Informação) Title III Article 55, the electronic-communications sector's own integrity-and-security clause and its personal-data breach-notification duty for operators of publicly accessible electronic-communications networks.

Lei n.º 38/20 (Código Penal) stays with the scraping topic's computer-misuse family.

Sector security regimes

BNA Aviso 08/2020, Cybersecurity Policy and Cloud Contracting Duties of Supervised Financial Institutions

Aviso n.º 8/20 (BNA), Artigos 4.º a 7.º e 9.º a 12.ºText of Aviso n.º 8/20 of the Banco Nacional de Angola, LEX.AO (Legislação Angolana) record with the Diário da República publication details

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 2 of Aviso n.º 08/2020 applies the Aviso to the financial institutions under the supervision of the Banco Nacional de Angola. Article 4 requires those institutions to define, implement and maintain a cybersecurity policy, based on internationally accepted standards, principles and guidelines, that aims to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of the networks, data and information systems they use.

Article 4 requires the policy's procedures and controls to include authentication, authorization, encryption and intrusion prevention and detection, data-leak prevention, and periodic tests and audits to detect vulnerabilities. Article 6 requires the institutions to draw up an action plan able to respond to incidents, with a procedures manual approved by the management body and reviewed annually or whenever relevant changes occur.

Article 7 requires the institutions to set up a dedicated structure or team responsible for the cybersecurity policy and for carrying out the action and incident-response plan. Article 5 requires the cybersecurity policy to be disclosed to the public, to staff and to service-provider companies, in clear, objective and accessible language.

Article 11 requires an institution, before contracting cloud-computing services, to verify and document the prospective provider's ability to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, availability and recovery of the data it processes or stores. Article 12 requires the institutions to classify the information they consider essential to the security of society, their clients and the State by secrecy level, from very confidential to public.

Article 10 requires an institution to tell the Banco Nacional de Angola of its intention to contract cloud-computing services at least 60 days before contracting, for appraisal and approval. Article 13 provides that non-compliance with the Aviso is a contravention punishable under Lei n.º 12/15, the Lei de Bases das Instituições Financeiras. The Aviso was published in the Diário da República Iª Série n.º 41 of . Article 16 of the Aviso has it enter into force 30 days after the date of its publication.

What it requires

Lei de Protecção das Redes e Sistemas Informáticos, Security Duties for Information-Society Systems, Computer Programs and Databases

Lei n.º 7/17, Artigos 12.º, 13.º, 14.º, 17.º, 18.º e 19.ºAngoLex (Portal da Legislação Angolana), full text of Lei n.º 7/17

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 12 requires the body responsible for promoting the information society, and every provider, operator and service provider of information-society-system services, to guarantee the security of any device or set of devices, and the network supporting communication between them, that stores, processes, retrieves, receives or transmits data in execution of a computer program.

Article 13 requires the entity responsible for management, or the operators and service providers, of a computer infrastructure to apply the measures and techniques needed to secure and protect the assets essential to that infrastructure's proper functioning. Article 14 requires an internet operator or service provider to promote user registration and to carry out the measures and instruments needed to anticipate, detect, react to and recover from security risk situations on its networks.

Article 18 extends this Law's measures and techniques to computer programs, without stating a separate support-period, update or vulnerability-disclosure-channel duty for the program itself, and Article 19 requires database use to follow technical rules and specialised procedures adequate to protect access, storage, file duplication, treatment and the recovery of automated information.

Article 4(ff) defines the bound information-society-service class as broadly as the EU's information-society-service concept: any service normally provided at a distance, by electronic means, at the individual request of a recipient, excluding television and radio broadcasting, automatic note or ticket dispensing, and payment-gated road, parking or similar access even where an electronic device controls or verifies the payment.

Article 47 has the Law enter into force on the date of its publication, the Official Gazette's Diário da República Iª Série n.º 27 of , following approval by the National Assembly on and promulgation by the President on .

What it requires

Lei de Protecção das Redes e Sistemas Informáticos, Security Duties of Electronic-Communications Network Operators and Critical Infrastructure Operators

Lei n.º 7/17, Artigos 6.º a 11.ºAngoLex (Portal da Legislação Angolana), full text of Lei n.º 7/17

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 6 of Lei n.º 7/17 requires the networks of cyberspace to ensure the integrity, confidentiality and privacy of communications by implementing the logical and physical security services set out in the electronic communications regime.

Article 7 makes it the task of operators and service providers of critical cyberspace infrastructure to apply measures and techniques that secure and protect the assets essential to critical social functions, such as water, electricity and electronic communications services. Article 8 makes the operator of an electronic communications network responsible for guaranteeing the technical and security conditions under which the traffic and location data of natural and legal persons are transmitted.

Article 9 subjects electronic communications networks to technical and operational measures that respond to errors, attacks, thefts, accidents, cyber-attacks and other incidents, through adequate and efficient incident-response management mechanisms. Article 10 makes it the task of operators and service providers of electronic communications networks to implement preventive services of warnings, alerts, recommendations and security information.

Article 11 makes it the task of the same operators and providers to carry out the measures and instruments needed to anticipate, detect, react to and recover from security risk situations on the networks. Article 42 of the Law sets a fine of Kz 7,000,000 to Kz 150,000,000 for non-compliance with Articles 12, 13, 14, 15 and 18. The Law was published in the Diário da República Iª Série n.º 27 of . Article 47 of the Law has it enter into force on the date of its publication.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

BNA Aviso 08/2020, Notification of Cyber Incidents to the Banco Nacional de Angola

Aviso n.º 8/20 (BNA), Artigo 8.ºText of Aviso n.º 8/20 of the Banco Nacional de Angola, LEX.AO (Legislação Angolana) record with the Diário da República publication details

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 2 of Aviso n.º 08/2020 applies the Aviso to the financial institutions under the supervision of the Banco Nacional de Angola. Article 8 requires the institutions to report to the Banco Nacional de Angola breaches of networks and information systems, or losses of integrity, with a significant impact on the functioning of those networks and services.

Article 8 requires that report to be made after detection of the incident, followed by situation updates at intervals of 4 hours until normal service is restored. Article 8 requires the institutions to develop initiatives to share information on relevant incidents, where necessary and without prejudice to professional secrecy and free competition.

Article 13 provides that non-compliance with the Aviso is a contravention punishable under Lei n.º 12/15, the Lei de Bases das Instituições Financeiras. The Aviso was published in the Diário da República Iª Série n.º 41 of . Article 16 of the Aviso has it enter into force 30 days after the date of its publication.

What it requires

Lei de Protecção das Redes e Sistemas Informáticos, Incident-Management Planning, Alert Dissemination and CERT Coordination Duties

Lei n.º 7/17, Artigos 15.º, 16.º, 40.º e 41.ºAngoLex (Portal da Legislação Angolana), full text of Lei n.º 7/17

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 15(1) requires a provider, operator or service provider of cyberspace, before starting its activity, to submit an accident-and-incident management plan to the entity that regulates data protection and to the body responsible for promoting the information society, for use in a computer emergency, and Article 15(2) requires alerts and warnings to be disseminated in the event of an attack, computer theft or any computer incident.

Article 16(1) requires the relevant services to be equipped with devices capable of issuing an alert on an event or a request, and of sending a technical report on a compromised server, widely disseminated malicious code, a software vulnerability or anything an intrusion-detection system or event log identifies, and Article 16(2) ties that reactive service to the central work of the CERT-equivalent Equipa de Monitorização e Respostas aos Incidentes Informáticos (Computer Incident Monitoring and Response Team).

Article 40 leaves that team's own organisation and functioning, which would be the natural place a reporting channel and clock could sit, to a separate decree ("diploma próprio") not located here, and Article 41 requires the team to maintain institutional cooperation with public and private bodies. Unlike the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)'s 72-hour or the Cyber Resilience Act's 24-hour clock, no article reviewed here states a deadline for any of these notifications.

Article 47 has the Law enter into force on the date of its publication, the Official Gazette's Diário da República Iª Série n.º 27 of , following approval by the National Assembly on and promulgation by the President on .

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (202 words)

Angola has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the general copyright framework of Lei n.º 15/14, de 31 de Julho de 2014 (Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos), which repealed and replaced Lei n.º 4/90, is the law reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Article 51 permits, without the author's authorisation and without remuneration, quoting short fragments of another's already-lawfully-disclosed work where justified for scientific, critical, didactic, or informational purposes, and separately permits reproducing works included in filmed or televised news reports or works permanently exhibited in a public place.

Neighbouring rights under the Act protect performers, phonogram and videogram producers, and broadcasting organisations rather than news publishers, so there is no publisher-side right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates; the Act protects a database's structure as a compilation (Article 45) rather than through a separate sui generis right, and Article 51(2)(c) expressly excludes reproducing the whole or an important part of a digital database from the private-use exception; no machine-readable text-and-data-mining opt-out mechanism is stated, and no reported Angolan decision applies the quotation or news-reporting exception to a systematic online news aggregator as opposed to a traditional press review.

Snippet reproduction

Copyright and Related Rights Law, Quotation and News-Reporting Exceptions

Lei n.º 15/14, de 31 de Julho de 2014 (Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos), art. 51.ºText of Lei n.º 15/14 (Direito de Autor e Direitos Conexos)

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/pt/ao/ao028pt.pdf

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 51(1) permits, independent of the author's authorisation and without any remuneration, several uses of an already-lawfully-disclosed work provided its title and the author's name are stated and its genuineness and integrity respected. Alínea (e) of that article covers quoting short fragments of another's work, in written, sound, or visual form, where justified on scientific, critical, didactic, or informational grounds.

Alínea (c) of the same article covers reproducing works included in filmed or televised current-events reports, or works permanently exhibited in a public place. Article 51(2) excludes several categories from the private-reproduction exception at alínea (d) of the same article, including at alínea (c) reproducing the whole or an important part of a database in digital form.

Article 45 gives the holder of a database's patrimonial right the exclusive right to authorise or prohibit reproduction, translation, adaptation, or distribution of the database's structure. Article 95 has the Law enter into force thirty days after its publication, which was the Official Gazette's Diário da República Iª Série n.º 141 of ; no source stating the resulting day has been located.

Article 92's repeal clause revokes Lei n.º 4/90, de 10 de Março, the prior copyright statute, applying the new Law to any dispute not yet finally decided to the extent that benefits the author.

What it requires

Where nothing was found1 area of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

Age gating law

Angola has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.

Lei n.º 25/12 (Lei sobre a Protecção e Desenvolvimento Integral da Criança) devotes Article 30 to a duty on the family, schools, libraries, and other entities that make internet information available to children to equip their equipment with technological measures protecting children from inappropriate cybernetic content, a duty addressed to access-providing institutions rather than an age-verification or gating duty on an online service or distributor; Article 31 restricts what children's and youth publications may depict (no alcohol, tobacco, or weapons imagery); and Article 32 states a general State duty to prevent children's access to pornographic or violence-inciting material, without addressing an online or on-demand service.

Lei n.º 1/17 (Lei de Imprensa), Article 63, requires a broadcaster to precede a programme that could negatively affect children's or adolescents' personality formation with an explicit warning and an appropriate indicator, and to air it only at night, a content-labelling and scheduling duty rather than an age-verification or access-control duty on a distributor or platform.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Angola AI law
  • No current case law for Angola privacy law
  • No current case law for Angola scraping law
  • No current case law for Angola cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Angola communications law
  • No current case law for Angola content moderation law
  • No current case law for Angola product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Angola digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Angola age gating law
  • No current case law for Angola reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here1 instrument

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Angola comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

4 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Angola

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.