Law / South Africa

POPIA, automated decisions

POPIA, s. 71 (automated individual decisions)

In force since .

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Data subject rights, Disclosure

As of .

What it requires

  • Do not base a decision that has legal or substantially similar consequences for a person solely on automated processing of their personal information, unless the person can make representations about the decision and you have explained the underlying logic of the processing to them.

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Section 71(1) bars subjecting a data subject to a decision that has legal consequences for them, or affects them to a substantial degree, when the decision is based solely on the automated processing of their personal information to profile them, including their work performance, creditworthiness, reliability, location, health, preferences or conduct.

Subsection (2) lifts the bar where the decision was taken in connection with concluding or executing a contract and the data subject's request was met or appropriate measures protect their interests, or where a law or code of conduct governs the decision with the same safeguards specified.

Those safeguards must let the data subject make representations about the decision, and require the responsible party to give them enough information about the automated processing's underlying logic to make those representations.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app