Law / United States / Pennsylvania

H.B. 2829, Frontier Artificial Intelligence Safety, Transparency and Accountability Act

Pa. H.B. 2829, 2025-2026 Regular Session

In committee, dated , as of .

An AI governance rule binding private bodies.

Obligation class
Disclosure, Governance, Reporting
Audit expectation
periodic
Who audits it
Independent third party
Where the report goes
Filed with regulator

As of .

Where it has got to

The text described here is Printer's Number 4002, as introduced. That print is PN 4002, published .

Locally, this stage is House Communications and Technology Committee.

The stage above is recorded at www.palegis.us.

More on this stage

Introduced and referred to the House Communications and Technology Committee on . The committee calendar lists a public hearing on this bill and House Bill 2800 on , and the status page records no later action. The 2025-2026 session runs through .

What it requires

  • If you are a large frontier developer, do not develop, deploy or operate a frontier model, in whole or in part, in Pennsylvania without a current disclosure statement filed with the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and the required fee paid; renew the statement every year and whenever ownership of the model transfers or the reported information materially changes.
  • If you are a large frontier developer, write, implement, comply with and publish on your website a frontier AI framework describing how you set capability thresholds for catastrophic risk, apply and review mitigations before deploying or extensively using a frontier model internally, use third-party assessors, secure unreleased model weights, respond to critical safety incidents, govern these processes internally, manage catastrophic risk from internal use and put safeguards in place against an unreasonable risk of death or serious injury to more than 50 people or more than $1,000,000,000 in property damage.
  • If you are a large frontier developer, review your frontier AI framework at least once a year; within 30 days of a material modification publish the modified framework with a justification; keep an unredacted copy and its revision records for as long as a frontier model is deployed plus five years; and send the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and the Attorney General a copy within 30 days of first publication and of each material modification.
  • If you are a large frontier developer, do not deploy a frontier model if, on the assessments and mitigation your framework requires, deployment would create an unreasonable risk that it will cause or materially contribute to the death of, or serious injury to, more than 50 people or more than $1,000,000,000 in property damage.
  • If you are a large frontier developer, retain an independent third party every year to audit your compliance with the act; do not retain a party with which you share a financial interest or condition its payment on the result; and give the auditor access to the materials it needs.
  • Before or when you deploy a new or substantially modified frontier model, publish on your website a transparency report giving your website, a way to contact you, the model's release date, supported languages and output modalities, intended uses and any general restrictions on use; as a large frontier developer, add machine-readable summaries of your catastrophic-risk assessments, their results, the role of third-party evaluators and the other steps you took under your framework.
  • Report a critical safety incident involving one of your frontier models to the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and the Attorney General within 72 hours of learning facts sufficient to establish a reasonable belief that it occurred, and disclose an incident that poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury within 24 hours to an appropriate authority, including a law enforcement or public safety agency with jurisdiction.
  • If you are a large frontier developer, send the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency a summary of each assessment of catastrophic risk from internal use of your frontier models every three months, or on another reasonable schedule you have communicated in writing.
  • Do not knowingly make a false or materially misleading statement or omission in or about a document you publish, submit or transmit under the act concerning catastrophic risk from your frontier models or your management of it; as a large frontier developer, the same applies to your implementation of or compliance with your frontier AI framework, unless the statement was made in good faith and was reasonable under the circumstances.
  • Do not make or enforce a rule, policy or contract that prevents a covered employee from disclosing a specific and substantial danger to public health or safety from catastrophic risk, or a violation of the act, to the agency, the Attorney General, a federal authority or a person with authority to correct it, and do not retaliate for such a disclosure; give covered employees notice of these rights; as a large frontier developer, provide an internal process for anonymous disclosure with a monthly status update and share disclosures and responses with officers and directors at least quarterly.
  • If you redact a document you publish under the act, describe the character and justification of each redaction in the published version to the extent the reasons for redaction permit, and keep the unredacted information for five years.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text, as of .

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureNo

Private right of actionNo

Penalty structure

As introduced, a large frontier developer that fails to publish, submit or transmit a compliant document, makes a statement in violation of section 1104, deploys a frontier model in violation of section 506, fails to obtain the required audit, fails to report a critical safety incident or fails to comply with its own framework faces a civil penalty that scales with severity and does not exceed $1,000,000 for a first violation and $3,000,000 for a subsequent violation, recovered by the Attorney General. Separately the agency may levy $1,000 for each day a disclosure statement is missing or false information goes uncorrected, plus the assessments owed, after notice and hearing.

Rule
Per violation only
As of
Currency
USD
Per violation unit
Violation
Per violation amount
1,000,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, in consultation with the Attorney General; civil penalties recovered by the Attorney General

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

House Bill 2829 was introduced on and referred to the House Communications and Technology Committee the same day. It would create the Frontier Artificial Intelligence Safety, Transparency and Accountability Act. A frontier model is a foundation model trained using more than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations of computing power.

A large frontier developer could not develop, deploy or operate a frontier model in the Commonwealth without a current disclosure statement filed with the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency and payment of the required fee. Each large frontier developer would have to write, implement, comply with and publish a frontier AI framework.

A large frontier developer could not deploy a frontier model where, on its assessments and mitigation, deployment would create an unreasonable risk of death or serious injury to more than 50 people or more than $1,000,000,000 in property damage. A large frontier developer would have to retain a third party to perform an independent audit of compliance every year.

A frontier developer would have to report a critical safety incident to the agency and the Attorney General within 72 hours of learning facts sufficient to establish a reasonable belief that one has occurred. A large frontier developer that commits a listed violation would face a civil penalty of up to $1,000,000 for a first violation and up to $3,000,000 for a subsequent violation. The Attorney General may bring the civil action to recover a civil penalty.

The bill creates no private right of action. A political subdivision could not enact or enforce a requirement that specifically regulates artificial intelligence frontier models. The act would take effect on .

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app trains models or generates content with AI.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app