Law / United States / Nevada

Consumer Health Data, biometric data definition

NRS 603A.415, 603A.430

In force since .

A sensitive categories rule binding private bodies.

Excludes recording-derived identifiers
No
How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Data subject residence
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Treat a voiceprint, faceprint, or other biometric identifier as regulated consumer health data in Nevada only where it is related to a health condition, diagnosis, treatment, or similar information under this chapter.
  • Do not rely on any Nevada statute to cover a general-purpose voiceprint or faceprint you collect for identification, authentication, or marketing with no connection to health status. Nevada has no biometric-privacy statute reaching that use.
  • Do not assume a photograph or video is exempt. Nevada's biometric data definition names facial imagery directly, with no carve-out for data derived from a recording.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Open questions
Is a voiceprint or faceprint that a regulated entity uses only to verify a person's identity "consumer health data" under NRS 603A.430(1)(b), which reaches biometric data "related to" health information, when the entity does not use it to identify the person's health status?

What it makes you log

Logging duty

The sections cited are definitions (biometric data, collect, consumer, consumer health data), which state no duty to create, keep or produce a log or record. The consumer definition turns on residence in this State or collection of the data in this State; only the residence test is coded as a hook value. A regulated entity's reach (conducts business in this State or targets consumers here) is stated in 603A.465, outside the cited sections. The duty to retain a copy of a written authorization to sell consumer health data for at least six years after it expires is in 603A.535(8), also outside the cited sections.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Nevada's only enacted biometric-data definition binds a controller only when the biometric data is related to a health condition, diagnosis, treatment, or similar information, making it "consumer health data" under this chapter; it does not operate as a general biometric-privacy statute.

"Biometric data" is defined broadly, including imagery of a fingerprint, palm print, hand print, scar, bodily mark, tattoo, voiceprint, face, retina, iris, or vein pattern, and keystroke or gait patterns or rhythms that contain identifying information, and unlike New Hampshire's, Kentucky's, Rhode Island's, and Vermont's definitions, it carries no exclusion for a photograph or recording at all, in either direction: imagery of a person's face is itself named as a form of biometric data.

A general-purpose voiceprint or faceprint collected for identification, authentication, or marketing, with no connection to health status, has no Nevada statutory home at all.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app processes biometric data or processes personal data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .