Law / United States /
Nebraska
Nebraska Data Privacy Act, sensitive data and biometric data definitions
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-1102(3), (30)
A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.
What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.
In force since 1 January 2025.
A sensitive categories rule binding private bodies.
As of 27 August 2026.
What it requires
- Treat genetic or biometric data processed to uniquely identify a Nebraska consumer as sensitive data requiring heightened handling under NDPA.
- Treat a voice print or other biometric identifier generated from a recording, for the purpose of identifying a specific individual, as covered biometric data. Nebraska's exclusion does not reach data generated for that purpose.
What it reaches
Excludes recording-derived identifiersNo
What this law does
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.
NDPA classifies data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, mental or physical health diagnosis, sexual orientation, or citizenship or immigration status, genetic or biometric data processed to uniquely identify an individual, a known child's data, and precise geolocation data as sensitive data.
'Biometric data' means data generated to identify a specific individual through automatic measurement of a biological characteristic, including a fingerprint, voice print, retina image, or iris image, and is structured slightly differently in wording from the Connecticut, Oregon, Montana, and Delaware definitions (opening with the identification purpose rather than excluding then clawing back), but reaches the same operative result: a raw recording is excluded, except when generated to identify a specific individual.
When LexLint raises it
processes_biometricsprocesses_voicecrawls_webtrains_models
Read the law
official Nebraska statute text, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 87-1102
Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.