Law / United States / Massachusetts

Massachusetts Data Privacy Act (MDPA)

Mass. S.2619 (formerly S.2608); House substitute H.5472/H.5479, 194th Gen. Ct.

In reconciliation between two chambers, dated , as of .

A comprehensive regime rule binding private bodies.

How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Operator establishment, Market targeting, Data subject residence
Audit expectation
on_request
Who audits it
Regulator
Where the report goes
Produced on request

Where it has got to

The text described here is Senate print S.2619, the text of S.2608 as amended and passed by the Senate. That print is S.2619, published .

Locally, this stage is committee of conference.

The stage above is recorded at malegislature.gov.

More on this stage

The Senate declined to concur in the House amendment on and appointed conferees; the House insisted on its amendment and appointed its own on . No conference report is recorded. Formal sessions of the 194th General Court ended on , and a bill not enacted before the term of the 194th General Court ends would have to be filed again.

What it requires

  • Track the Massachusetts Data Privacy Act's conference committee process, since the bill has passed both chambers in different forms.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

Who enforces it

Settledness

As of
Open questions
Does a person 'produce products or provide services that are targeted to residents of the commonwealth' under section 2 of proposed chapter 93M in the House amendment when its product is offered nationally and is not marketed to Massachusetts residents in particular?

What it makes you log

Who may demand the log

Regulator

What the log must hold

Decision basis

Logging duty

A controller would have to conduct and document a data protection assessment for each processing activity that presents a heightened risk of harm (targeted advertising, sale of personal data, risky profiling, sensitive data, and in the House text processing through a product used mainly by minors). The assessment must identify the categories of data, the purposes and whether data is sold or transferred, and weigh the benefits against the risks as mitigated by safeguards. The House text lets the Attorney General require disclosure of an assessment relevant to an investigation, and the Senate text requires disclosure on the Attorney General's request. Neither text sets a retention period; the House text asks the controller to review and update the assessment as often as appropriate. Both texts let a controller meet a deletion request by retaining a record of it, which is an option and not a duty. The Senate text applies to persons that meet consumer-count or revenue thresholds, with a consumer defined as a resident of the Commonwealth; the House text applies to persons that conduct business in the Commonwealth and produce products or provide services targeted to residents, and also defines a consumer as a resident. The bill is not enacted and the two texts are in conference.

Kind
Implicit
As of
Provision
Proposed G.L. c. 93M, House text H.5479 s. 10(b), (c) and (d) (Senate text S.2619 s. 7(a), (b) and (e)): a data protection assessment of each heightened-risk processing activity must be conducted and documented and made available to the Attorney General
Trigger
personal_data_processing

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

The Massachusetts Data Privacy Act (MDPA) would establish the state's first comprehensive consumer personal-data regime; it is not enacted and imposes no duty today. Originally S.2608, it passed the Senate 40-0 on , was engrossed as S.2619, and was amended by the House (Ways and Means reported a substitute striking the text and inserting H.5472, itself amended and republished as H.5479) before passing the House 146-0 on .

The Senate non-concurred in the House amendment on and appointed a conference committee; the House insisted on its own amendment and appointed its own conferees on . As of the date shown, the bill remains in conference with no compromise text produced.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app processes personal data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .