Law / New Zealand

Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993, Restricted Publications and Supply to Minors

Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993 (NZ), No 94, ss. 3, 122, 122A, 125-127

archived copyRead from a public archive copy, not the publisher directly. The publisher does not serve this page to automated readers, so a direct fetch was not an option here; how we access sources. Archived . Publisher's page: https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0094/latest/whole.html

In force since .

An adult content age verification (AV) rule binding public and private bodies.

Enforcement body
New Zealand Police; Attorney-General's consent required for a private prosecution
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Applies to any supplier, distributor or exhibitor of a publication, including a service provider or platform that gives access to digital content over a public data network; online access counts as distributing, as for a physical retailer. Email and broadcasting-service transmission are excluded.
  • Do not supply, distribute, exhibit or display a publication classified as restricted otherwise than in accordance with its classification, most often an age limit such as 18 or a younger age. This is a strict-liability offence; knowing or having reasonable cause to believe it is restricted carries a higher penalty.
  • Do not supply, distribute, exhibit or display to a person under 18 any publication that would be classified objectionable if made available to a person of that recipient's age, where you know or have reasonable cause to believe this; the offence applies even if the publication is not objectionable for an adult.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureYes

Private right of actionNo

Criminal exposure note

Under s. 125(2), strict-liability supply of a restricted publication contrary to its classification carries a fine of up to $3,000 for an individual or $10,000 for a body corporate. Under s. 126(1) and (2), the knowledge-based version of that offence, and the separate offence of supplying to a person under 18 a publication objectionable for that person's age, carry up to 3 months' imprisonment or a $10,000 fine for an individual, or a $25,000 fine for a body corporate.

Penalty structure

Body-corporate fine cap under s. 126(2)(b) for the knowledge-based restricted-publication and supply-to-minor offences; a natural person instead faces up to 3 months' imprisonment or a $10,000 fine under s. 126(2)(a). The strict-liability form of the restricted-publication offence under s. 125(2) carries lower caps of $3,000 (individual) and $10,000 (body corporate).

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Currency
NZD
Fixed cap
25,000

What it reaches

Age threshold

18

Covered services

Any supplier, distributor, or exhibitor of a publication, including a service provider or platform that provides access to digital content by means of a public data network; email and broadcasting-service transmission are excluded from the definition of digital content.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

The cited sections create strict-liability and knowledge offences for dealing in a restricted publication, or supplying an objectionable one to a person under 18, and state no duty to create or keep a record of an age check or a supply.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

A publication classified as restricted may not be supplied, distributed, exhibited, or displayed otherwise than in accordance with its classification, most often an age limit such as 18 years or a younger specified age; doing so is a strict-liability offence, and doing so knowing or with reasonable cause to believe the publication is restricted carries a higher penalty.

Separately, supplying, distributing, exhibiting, or displaying to a person under 18 any publication that would itself be classified objectionable if made available to a person of that recipient's age is an offence where the supplier knows or has reasonable cause to believe this, regardless of whether the publication is objectionable for an adult recipient.

Distribute is defined to include providing access to a publication by means of a public data network, so an online host or platform supplying or displaying content falls within these provisions on the same terms as a physical retailer.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app publishes adult content.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .