Law / North Macedonia

Law on Personal Data Protection (LPDP), automated individual decision-making

Zakon za zastita na licnite podatoci, art. 26 (automated individual decision-making, including profiling)

In force since .

A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.

Obligation class
Data subject rights
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Give a data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them, under Article 26.
  • Where a decision based solely on automated processing rests on a contract with the data subject or their explicit consent, implement suitable measures to safeguard their rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, at a minimum human intervention by the controller, the chance to express a personal view and the right to contest the decision, under Article 26, paragraph 3.
  • Do not base such a decision on special categories of personal data unless Article 13, paragraph 2, point 1 or 7 applies and suitable safeguards are in place, under Article 26, paragraph 4.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

In the frameworks

NIST AI RMF
  • MAP 3.5Processes for human oversight are defined, assessed, and documented in accordance with organizational policies from the GOVERN function.
NIST Privacy Framework
  • CT.DM-P10Stakeholder privacy preferences are included in algorithmic design objectives and outputs are evaluated against these preferences.

Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law

What record it asks for

Logging duty

Article 26 gives the right not to be subject to a solely automated decision, sets the exceptions and requires safeguards (human intervention, the right to express a view and to contest). It states no duty to create, keep or produce a log or record of the decision.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 26, paragraph 1 gives a data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them. The right does not apply to a decision that is necessary for a contract between the data subject and the controller, that a law applying to the controller authorizes with suitable safeguards, or that rests on the data subject's explicit consent.

In the contract and consent cases the controller must implement suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, at a minimum the right to human intervention by the controller, the right to express a personal view and the right to contest the decision. Article 26, paragraph 4 bars basing those decisions on special categories of personal data unless Article 13, paragraph 2, point 1 or 7 applies and suitable safeguards are in place.

Chapter III, which carries Article 26, applies until North Macedonia's accession to the European Union, when it ceases to apply under Article 122 as amended.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .