GDPR Articles 12-21, Data Subject Rights as Applied in Lithuania
Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Arts. 12-21
In force since .
A data subject rights rule binding public and private bodies.
- How the hook was established
- express
- What makes it apply
- Operator establishment, Market targeting, User location, Place of effect
- Audit expectation
- none
What it requires
- Honor a person's request to access, rectify, erase, restrict, port, or object to processing of their personal data in Lithuania within one month of receipt.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Case C-307/22 FT v DW, judgment of (First Chamber) (recorded ).
In the frameworks
- NIST Privacy Framework
- CT.PO-P3Policies, processes, and procedures for enabling individuals’ data processing preferences and requests are established and in place.
Our reading of where this law's duties sit in each framework. It never says that running a control meets the law. How we read a framework against the law
Who enforces it
Settledness
- As of
- Case link
- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62022CJ0307
- Case citation
- Case C-307/22 FT v DW, judgment of (First Chamber)
- Open questions
- Outside a doctor-patient relationship, when does Article 15(3) entitle a data subject to a full copy of the documents containing the personal data, rather than a faithful and intelligible reproduction of the data themselves?
What it makes you log
Logging duty
Articles 12 to 21 set how and when a controller answers a rights request. They state no duty to create, keep or produce a log or record of the request or the answer.
- Kind
- None
- As of
What this law does
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Articles 12 to 21 apply directly in Lithuania: access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, and objection, exercisable against the controller.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app processes personal data.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .