Law / Liechtenstein

DSG Special-Category Data and Datenschutzstelle Biometric-Data Concept in Liechtenstein

DSG, LGBl. 2018 Nr. 272, special categories provisions

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 1 January 2019.

A sensitive categories rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 24 August 2026.

What it requires

  • Ground the processing of any biometric identifier of a person in Liechtenstein, including a faceprint or voiceprint captured for unique identification, on a DSG condition equivalent to General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 9(2), such as explicit consent.

What it reaches

Excludes recording-derived identifiersNo

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Biometric identifiers are governed by the DSG's own special-category-data provisions, modeled on General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 9. The Datenschutzstelle's own published glossary of GDPR-equivalent concepts names both voice and images within the biometric-data concept it applies, and separately notes that voice is treated as a behavioral characteristic, with the specific technical processing method determining whether a given voice capture rises to the level of unique-identification biometric data.

This is the regulator's own restatement of the concept, not a quote from the DSG's own statutory Article 4 text, which could not be accessed directly; it is recorded at medium confidence for that reason. No Liechtenstein-specific voiceprint or faceprint case or regulatory guidance beyond this glossary entry was located.

When LexLint raises it

  • processes_biometrics
  • processes_voice

Read the law

Datenschutzstelle glossary

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app