Law / South Korea

AI Framework Act, Article 35 (impact assessment for high-impact AI)

Act No. 20676, Article 35

In force since .

An AI risk obligations rule binding public and private bodies.

How the hook was established
express
What makes it apply
Market targeting, User location
Obligation class
DPIA
Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Endeavor to assess in advance, before you provide a product or service that uses high-impact AI, its effect on people's fundamental rights, and have the assessment reflect the characteristics of vulnerable groups of AI users.
  • Where you carry out the assessment, cover the matters the Enforcement Decree lists: the individuals and groups likely to be affected, the types of fundamental rights engaged, the social and economic impact, how the AI is used, the metrics and method of producing results, measures to prevent, mitigate and recover from harm, and any improvement plan.
  • If you are a state organ or similar body that intends to use a product or service built on high-impact AI, give priority consideration to one that has undergone an impact assessment.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 35 asks for an advance impact assessment of high-impact AI, and Article 28 of the Enforcement Decree lists what the assessment covers and lets the operator run it itself or commission a third party. Neither states a duty to create, keep or later produce a log or record.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

An AI business operator that provides a product or service using high-impact AI must endeavor to assess in advance the effect on people's fundamental rights. The duty to endeavor to assess took effect on , with the rest of the Act. The assessment must also reflect the characteristics of vulnerable groups of AI users, according to the nature of the product or service.

That sentence comes from an amending Act promulgated on , and took effect six months after promulgation. A state organ or similar body that intends to use such a product or service must give priority consideration to one that has undergone an impact assessment.

The Enforcement Decree requires the assessment to cover seven matters, among them the individuals and groups likely to be affected, the types of fundamental rights engaged, the metrics used, and measures to prevent, mitigate and recover from harm. The operator may carry out the assessment itself or commission a third party.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions or processes biometric data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .