Law / France

Arrêté du 26 février 2025 désignant les services établis dans un autre État membre de l'Union européenne soumis aux articles 10 et 10-1 de la loi n° 2004-575 du 21 juin 2004 (Ministerial order of 26 February 2025 designating services established in another EU member state subject to the age verification regime)

Arrêté du 26 février 2025 (ministère de la culture, ministère chargé du numérique), published in the Journal officiel of

In force since .

An adult content age verification (AV) rule binding private bodies.

Audit expectation
none

What it requires

  • Applies to you only if your service is one of the 17 named pornographic websites and video sharing platforms established in other EU member states, including Pornhub, YouPorn and RedTube (Aylo group) and xHamster (Hammy Media Ltd); the order applies from .
  • If you are named, the age verification and blocking regime of LCEN articles 10 and 10-1 extends to you.
  • A court challenge has not suspended the order: the Conseil d'Etat on set aside an interim suspension and restored the obligation with immediate effect.
  • The Court of Justice of the EU held on that the country of origin principle stops a member state applying a general and abstract criminal-law obligation on minors' access to pornography to a provider established in another member state, but does not stop targeted measures requiring such a provider to verify its users' age, subject to the conditions of Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/31.

These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text. Also read by: Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom) (guidance, recorded ); Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and Coyote System, judgment of (Grand Chamber) (recorded ).

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

Arcom; ministère de la culture and ministère chargé du numérique

Litigation

Court
Conseil d'État
Docket
Conseil d'État, 5e chambre, 15 juillet 2025, n° 505472 (Sté Hammy Media Ltd)
Posture
The Paris administrative court's interim relief judge suspended the order on after a challenge from Hammy Media Ltd (xHamster). On the Conseil d'État set aside that suspension and rejected the request to suspend the order, finding no urgency shown, and restored the age verification obligation with immediate effect. Aylo, which had voluntarily blocked its French sites in June 2025 in protest, reblocked them immediately after the ruling. Separately, on the Court of Justice of the EU ruled in joined cases C-188/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and C-190/24 Coyote System, on a reference from the Conseil d'État concerning the prior 2020 regime, that the e-Commerce Directive's country of origin principle precludes a general and abstract criminal-law obligation on providers established in other member states, but does not preclude targeted measures requiring such a provider to verify its users' age, subject to the conditions of Article 3(4) of Directive 2000/31.

Settledness

The Court of Justice ruled on references from the Conseil d'État about the earlier regime under Article 23 of Law No 2020-936 of , not on this arrêté.

As of
Case link
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62024CJ0188
Guidance link
https://www.arcom.fr/presse/pornographie-en-ligne-de-nouvelles-etapes-franchies-pour-la-protection-des-mineurs
Case citation
Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and Coyote System, judgment of (Grand Chamber)
Guidance body
Autorité de régulation de la communication audiovisuelle et numérique (Arcom)
Open questions
  • Can further services established in other Member States be added to the list of seventeen that Arcom calls the 'dix-sept premiers sites', and does a newly named service become subject to the duty only three months after the publication of the order that names it?
  • Has the Member State of establishment been asked to act and failed to do so before measures are taken against a service named in the arrêté, as the procedural obligation in Article 3(4)(b) of Directive 2000/31 requires according to Joined Cases C-188/24 and C-190/24?

What it reaches

Covered services

17 named pornographic websites and video sharing platforms established in other EU member states.

What it makes you log

Logging duty

Article 1 only designates, through an annex, the services that are subject to Articles 10 and 10-1 of the LCEN, and the order states no duty to create or keep a log or record. Any audit of an age-verification system is in Article 10 of the LCEN as rewritten by loi n° 2024-449, not in this order.

Kind
None
As of

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Extends the LCEN articles 10 and 10-1 age verification and blocking regime to named pornographic websites and video sharing platforms established in other EU member states, including Pornhub, YouPorn and RedTube (Aylo group) and xHamster (Hammy Media Ltd). Signed , published in the Journal officiel on , and applicable three months after publication, from .

Some designated platforms deployed age verification, while the Aylo sites voluntarily blocked access from France in protest rather than comply.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app publishes adult content.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app

Page updated .