Law / European Union

Japan Adequacy Decision, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/419

In force since .

A cross border transfer rule binding public and private bodies.

Criminal exposure
No
Private right of action
No
Obligation class
Transfer
Audit expectation
periodic
Who audits it
Regulator

As of .

What it requires

  • A transfer of personal data from the European Union to a personal information handling business operator in Japan subject to the Act on the Protection of Personal Information as complemented by the Supplementary Rules in Annex I may take place on the basis of Article 1(1) of the Decision, without any specific authorization (Article 45(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679).
  • The finding does not cover a transfer to a broadcasting institution, newspaper publisher, communication agency or other press organization, a person engaged in professional writing, a university or other academic organization, a religious body or a political body, to the extent the purposes of processing correspond to the purpose listed for that category (Article 1(2)).

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

The competent authorities of the Member States, which exercise their powers under Article 58 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and inform the Commission of any suspension or definitive ban of data flows to a business operator in Japan (Article 2), and the Commission, which monitors the application of the legal framework and may suspend, amend or repeal the Decision (Article 3).

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article 1(1) provides that, for the purposes of Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, Japan ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from the European Union to personal information handling business operators in Japan subject to the Act on the Protection of Personal Information as complemented by the Supplementary Rules set out in Annex I, together with the official representations, assurances and commitments contained in Annex II.

Article 1(2) provides that the Decision does not cover personal data transferred to broadcasting institutions, newspaper publishers, communication agencies or other press organizations, persons engaged in professional writing, universities and other academic organizations, religious bodies or political bodies, to the extent the purposes of processing correspond to the press, writing, academic, religious or political purposes listed.

Article 2 requires a Member State whose competent authorities exercise their powers under Article 58 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 leading to the suspension or definitive ban of data flows to a specific business operator in Japan within the scope of Article 1 to inform the Commission without delay.

Article 3(4) requires the Commission, within two years from the date of the notification of the Decision to the Member States and subsequently at least every four years, to evaluate the finding in Article 1(1) on the basis of all available information, including the information received as part of the Joint Review carried out together with the relevant Japanese authorities.

Article 3(5) provides that, where the Commission has indications that an adequate level of protection is no longer ensured, it informs the competent Japanese authorities and, if necessary, may decide to suspend, amend or repeal the Decision, or limit its scope, in particular where business operators in Japan do not comply with the additional safeguards in the Supplementary Rules in Annex I or there is insufficient oversight and enforcement in this regard.

Article 4 provides that the Decision is addressed to the Member States. The Commission's report on the first review of the functioning of the Decision (COM(2023) 275 final) concludes that Japan continues to ensure an adequate level of protection for personal data from the European Union to personal information handling business operators in Japan subject to the Act on the Protection of Personal Information as complemented by the Supplementary Rules.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app crawls the web, trains models, deploys a chatbot, sends automated outreach, processes voice recordings or processes biometric data.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app