Law / Germany

Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (Network Enforcement Act), Social Networks, Authorized Recipient and Fine, as amended in 2024

NetzDG §§ 1, 4, 4a, 5

In force since .

A transparency and process rule binding private bodies.

Obligation class
Disclosure, Reporting

As of .

What it requires

  • If you operate for profit a platform on which users share any content with other users or make it available to the public, and no other Member State is your country of establishment under section 2 of the Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz, designate an authorized recipient in Germany for service of documents in German court proceedings about unlawful content, and draw attention to him on your platform in an easily recognizable and directly accessible manner (section 5).
  • In an administrative procedure of the Bundesamt für Justiz, give it on request information about the measures taken to implement the Act, the number of registered users in Germany and the complaints about unlawful content received in the previous calendar year (section 4a(3)).

If you get it wrong

Criminal exposureNo

Penalty structure

Section 4(1) and (2): up to 500,000 euros for failing to designate an authorized recipient under section 5, first sentence. Section 4(2) makes section 30(2), third sentence, of the Ordnungswidrigkeitengesetz applicable, under which the maximum is multiplied by ten (5,000,000 euros) where a fine is imposed on a legal person or association under section 30 of that Act.

Rule
Fixed only
As of
Currency
EUR
Fixed cap
500,000

Who enforces it

Enforcement body

The Bundesamt für Justiz (Federal Office of Justice), the administrative authority for the fine under section 4(4), which also monitors compliance under section 4a(1).

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Section 1(1) applies the Act to providers of digital services that operate platforms on the internet for profit and that are designed to let users share any content with other users or make it available to the public (social networks). Platforms with journalistic and editorial offerings that the provider itself is responsible for are not social networks, and neither are platforms intended for individual communication or for the dissemination of specific content.

Section 5 requires providers of social networks for which no other Member State is the country of establishment under section 2 of the Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz to designate an authorized recipient in Germany and to draw attention to him on the platform in an easily recognizable and directly accessible manner.

Service of documents in court proceedings before German courts about the dissemination of unlawful content, or the unfounded assumption of such dissemination, especially where restoration of removed or blocked content is sought, can be effected on that recipient. Section 1(3) defines unlawful content as content that fulfils the elements of listed offences in the Strafgesetzbuch and is not justified.

Section 4(1) makes it an administrative offence to fail, intentionally or negligently, to designate an authorized recipient contrary to section 5, first sentence. Section 4(2) sets a maximum fine of 500,000 euros and makes section 30(2), third sentence, of the Ordnungswidrigkeitengesetz applicable. Under that sentence of the Ordnungswidrigkeitengesetz, where a statute refers to it, the maximum fine for the offences the statute names is multiplied by ten.

Section 4(4) names the Bundesamt für Justiz as the administrative authority for these offences. Section 4a(1) has the authority named in section 4 monitor compliance with the Act.

Section 4a(3) requires the provider of a social network, in an administrative procedure under section 4a(2), to give the authority on request information about the measures taken to implement the Act, the number of registered users in Germany and the complaints about unlawful content received in the previous calendar year. Article 29 of the Act of repealed sections 2 to 3f of the Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz. The Act was enacted as Article 1 of the Act of . It took effect on .

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app operates a social platform.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app