Marco Legal da Inteligência Artificial (PL 2338/2023)
Projeto de Lei nº 2.338/2023 (aprovado pelo Senado Federal em 10 de dezembro de 2024)
Before the second chamber, dated , as of .
An AI risk obligations rule.
- How the hook was established
- express
- What makes it apply
- Place of effect
- Audit expectation
- periodic
- Who audits it
- Registered or designated auditor, Regulator, Self
- Where the report goes
- Filed with regulator, Published summary
Where it has got to
The text described here is Autógrafo do Senado Federal, the text approved by the Senate on and sent to the Chamber of Deputies. That print is PL 2338/2023, published .
Locally, this stage is Comissão Especial da Câmara dos Deputados, aguardando parecer do relator (Special Committee of the Chamber of Deputies, awaiting the rapporteur's report).
The stage above is recorded at www.camara.leg.br.
The Senate approved a substitute text on and the Chamber of Deputies received it on . The Chamber's record shows the bill in its Special Committee awaiting the rapporteur's report, with other artificial intelligence bills joined to it through September 2026, and no committee report or plenary vote recorded.
What it requires
- As approved by the Federal Senate in substitute form, the bill establishes a general, risk-tiered legal framework for the development and use of artificial intelligence in Brazil.
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
What it makes you log
Who may demand the log
Regulator, Auditor or notified body
What the log must hold
Access record, Actor identity, Human involvement
Logging duty
As approved by the Senate, the bill requires a developer of a high-risk system to use tools or processes that record the operation of the system (Art. 18, II, b), an applier to document the degree of human oversight behind the outputs (Art. 18, I, d), and every public body using a high-risk system to set access and use protocols that record who used it, in what concrete situation and for what purpose (Art. 23, I). The bill is proposed and binds nobody yet.
- Kind
- Explicit
- As of
- Provision
- Art. 18, II, b; Art. 18, I, b and d; Art. 23, I
- Trigger
- high_risk_systems
Why the legislator wanted it
Parecer of the Comissao Temporaria Interna sobre Inteligencia Artificial (CTIA) on PL 2338/2023, in its draft substitute for the high-risk governance measure that became Art. 18; the Senate-approved Art. 18, II, b keeps the purpose "to allow evaluation of its accuracy and robustness". English: "use of tools for automatic recording of the system's operation, so as to allow evaluation of its accuracy and robustness and to identify potential discriminatory results".
- As of
- Quote
- uso de ferramentas de registro automático da operação do sistema, de modo a permitir a avaliação de sua acurácia e robustez e a apurar potenciais resultados discriminatórios
- Source link
- https://legis.senado.leg.br/sdleg-getter/documento?dm=9858756
- Source kind
- Committee report
- Purpose
- bias_and_performance_monitoring
What this law does
Projeto de Lei nº 2.338/2023, the Marco Legal da Inteligência Artificial, authored by Senator Rodrigo Pacheco, would be Brazil's general framework statute for artificial intelligence. The Federal Senate's plenary approved the bill in substitute form on , and it was remitted to the Chamber of Deputies on .
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app generates content with AI, deploys a chatbot or makes high-risk automated decisions.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .