Law / Belgium

Code de droit économique, Articles XI.228/2 to XI.228/9, Online Content-Sharing Service Providers (Article 17 of the Copyright Directive)

Code de droit économique, arts. XI.228/2-XI.228/3 and XI.228/5-XI.228/9

In force since .

A notice and action rule binding private bodies.

Obligation class
Licensing, Disclosure

As of .

What it requires

  • Treat giving the public access to works or performances that your users upload as your own act of communication to the public, which needs the rightholders' authorization (Article XI.228/3, paragraph 1); an authorization you obtain also covers your users' acts where they do not act on a commercial basis or earn no significant revenues (paragraph 2).
  • If you have no authorization, show that you made your best efforts to obtain one, made your best efforts, to high industry standards of professional diligence, to make specific works unavailable where rightholders gave you the relevant and necessary information, and acted promptly on a sufficiently substantiated notice to block access or remove the works while making your best efforts to prevent future uploads, to avoid liability for unauthorized acts of communication to the public (Article XI.228/5, paragraph 1).
  • If your services have been available to the public in the European Union for less than three years and your annual turnover is below EUR 10,000,000, you only have to show best efforts to obtain an authorization and prompt action on a sufficiently substantiated notice; once your average monthly unique visitors exceed five million, you must also show best efforts to prevent further uploads of the notified works (Article XI.228/5, paragraph 2).
  • Do not let your cooperation with rightholders prevent the availability of user uploads that do not infringe copyright or related rights, including works covered by an exception or limitation (Article XI.228/6, paragraph 1).
  • On request, give rightholders adequate information on how your cooperation practices work and, where you have license agreements with them, on the use of the covered works; tell your users in your general terms and conditions that they may use works under copyright exceptions and limitations (Article XI.228/7, paragraphs 1 and 2).
  • Run an effective and quick complaint and redress mechanism for users in disputes over blocked or removed uploads, handle complaints without undue delay and have decisions to block or remove content reviewed by a natural person (Article XI.228/8, paragraphs 1 and 3).
  • For activities directed at users or rightholders with their seat or habitual residence in Belgium, name in your general terms and conditions or license agreements two or more mediators you are prepared to work with on out-of-court settlement of disputes over blocking or removal, act in good faith in mediation, and bear a reasonable share of the mediation costs (Article XI.228/9).

What this law does

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

Research summary

Legal information, not legal advice. This is LexLint's own research summary of a public legal source, and it creates no attorney-client relationship. For decisions that matter, consult qualified counsel in the relevant jurisdiction. About LexLint

Article XI.228/2 of the Code de droit économique defines an online content-sharing service provider as the provider of an information society service whose main purpose, or one of whose main purposes, is to store and give the public access to a large amount of works or other protected subject matter uploaded by its users, which it organizes and promotes for profit.

Non-profit online encyclopedias, non-profit educational and scientific repositories, open-source software development and sharing platforms, electronic communications service providers, online marketplaces, business-to-business cloud services and cloud services that let users upload content for their own use are not online content-sharing service providers.

Under Article XI.228/3, paragraph 1, such a provider performs an act of communication to the public when it gives the public access to works or performances uploaded by its users. Under paragraph 2, an authorization the provider obtains also covers the acts of its users, as long as they are not acting on a commercial basis or their activity does not generate significant revenues.

Under Article XI.228/5, paragraph 1, if no authorization is granted the provider is liable for unauthorized acts of communication to the public unless it shows that it made its best efforts to obtain an authorization, made its best efforts, in accordance with high industry standards of professional diligence, to ensure the unavailability of specific works for which rightholders gave it the relevant and necessary information, and, in any event, acted promptly on a sufficiently substantiated notice from rightholders to block access or remove the works and made its best efforts to prevent their future upload.

Under paragraph 2, a new provider whose services have been available to the public in the European Union for less than three years and whose annual turnover is below EUR 10,000,000 only has to show its best efforts to obtain an authorization and prompt action on a sufficiently substantiated notice, and if its average monthly unique visitors exceed five million it must also show its best efforts to prevent further uploads of the notified works.

Article XI.228/6 provides that cooperation with rightholders must not prevent the availability of uploaded works that do not infringe copyright and related rights, including works covered by an exception or limitation, and that the chapter gives rise to no general monitoring obligation.

Article XI.228/7 requires providers to give rightholders, on request, adequate information on how their cooperation practices work and, where licenses exist, on the use of the covered works, and to tell users in their general terms and conditions that they may use works under exceptions and limitations.

Article XI.228/8 requires an effective and quick complaint and redress mechanism for users in disputes over blocked or removed uploads, with complaints handled without undue delay and decisions to block or remove subject to review by a natural person. Article XI.228/9 requires providers, for activities directed at users or rightholders with their seat or habitual residence in Belgium, to name two or more mediators with whom they are prepared to work on out-of-court settlement of such disputes.

Article XI.228/3, paragraph 3 disapplies the liability scheme of Article XII.19, paragraph 1 to situations covered by the chapter. The Act of replaced that reference with a reference to Article 8, paragraph 1 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065. The Federal Public Service Economy lists Articles XI.228/3 and XI.228/5 to XI.228/9 as the transposition of Article 17 of the Copyright Directive by the Act of .

The Federal Public Service Economy states that most provisions of the Act came into force on . The Act enters into force on the day of its publication in the Moniteur belge, except for listed provisions that do not include these articles. The Chamber of Representatives adopted the text in plenary session on , identical to the text adopted in committee in second reading.

When LexLint raises it

When your app profile says your app operates a social platform.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app