Zambia's comprehensive personal-data regime is the Data Protection Act, 2021, enforced by the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, which became fully operational in 2025 with an April 2025 controller and processor registration deadline.
The Act covers personal data processed wholly or partly by automated means, gives biometric and genetic data heightened status as sensitive personal data, requires breach notification to the Commissioner within twenty-four hours, gives a data subject a right against a purely automated decision that produces legal or similarly significant effects, and, by default, requires personal data to be processed and stored on a server or data centre located in Zambia, with an absolute in-country storage rule for sensitive personal data that sits alongside a separate provision permitting a sensitive-data transfer abroad on the data subject's explicit consent.
Section 49(1) requires a data controller to notify the Data Protection Commissioner within twenty-four hours of any security breach affecting personal data processed, a period the Act runs from the breach itself rather than from the moment the controller becomes aware of it. Section 49(2) requires a data processor to notify the data controller, as soon as practicable, of any security breach affecting personal data processed on the controller's behalf.
Section 49(3) requires a data controller or data processor to notify the data subject, as soon as practicable, of any security breach affecting personal data processed. None of the three duties is qualified by a risk threshold: the Act attaches them to any security breach affecting personal data, not only to one likely to cause harm. Section 82(2)(b) lets the Minister make regulations on the notification of security breaches, so the detail may be prescribed later.
Section 1 leaves commencement to a statutory instrument appointed by the Minister. The Data Protection Act (Commencement) Order, 2021 brought the Act into operation on , which is the day these provisions began to bind.
Section 3 applies the Act to processing personal data wholly or partly by automated means and to processing otherwise than by electronic means, and exempts only an individual's processing for personal use.
Section 12 sets the principles: personal data is to be processed lawfully, fairly and transparently, collected for explicit, specified and legitimate purposes and not further processed incompatibly with them, adequate, relevant and limited to what those purposes need, accurate and kept up to date with inaccurate data erased or rectified without delay, stored in identifiable form no longer than necessary, processed in accordance with the data subject's rights, and secured by appropriate technical or organisational measures against unauthorised or unlawful processing and against loss, destruction or damage.
Section 13 lists the grounds on which a data controller may process, and section 15 requires consent, with the data subject told of the right to withdraw it beforehand, the request presented separately from other matters in clear and plain language, the burden of proving consent on the controller, and everything collected after a withdrawal destroyed immediately. Section 16 requires collection directly from the data subject unless one of its listed exceptions applies.
Section 19 bars controlling or processing personal data without registration, and sections 20 to 28 govern that registration while sections 29 to 38 license data auditors.
Section 45 requires a written record of processing activities, available to the Commissioner on demand; section 46 requires a data protection impact assessment before high-risk processing using new technologies; section 47 requires security safeguards including pseudonymisation and encryption and a periodic review of them; section 48 requires a data protection officer; section 51 sets data retention; section 52 governs the engagement of a data processor; section 53 bars disclosure without the data subject's consent outside the grounds it lists; section 54 makes joint controllers jointly and severally liable; and section 57 requires notice to the Commissioner of any third-party agreement allowing a third party to trade on a data subject's profile.
Section 1 leaves commencement to a statutory instrument appointed by the Minister. The Data Protection Act (Commencement) Order, 2021 brought the Act into operation on , which is the day these provisions began to bind.
Section 70(1) requires a data controller to process and store personal data on a server or data centre located in the Republic. Section 70(2) lets the Minister prescribe categories of personal data that may be stored outside it. Section 70(3) keeps sensitive personal data on a server or data centre in the Republic despite that power.
Section 71(1) lets personal data outside those prescribed categories be transferred abroad where the data subject has consented and either the transfer is made under standard contracts or intra-group schemes the Commissioner has approved or the Minister has prescribed that transfers out are permissible, or where the Commissioner approves a particular transfer or set of transfers as permissible out of necessity.
Section 71(2) lets the Minister prescribe the criteria for those transfers only where the personal data will be subject to an adequate level of protection and enforcement by authorities with appropriate jurisdiction is effective, and section 71(3) has the Commissioner monitor the circumstances of data so transferred.
Section 71(4) permits transfer in an emergency to a person providing health or emergency services, where the data subject has explicitly consented to the transfer of sensitive personal data, and to an international organisation or country the Commissioner is satisfied about.
Section 71(6) requires a controller transferring under a standard contract or intra-group scheme to certify and periodically report to the Commissioner that it does so, and to bear liability for harm caused by the transferee's non-compliance. Section 1 leaves commencement to a statutory instrument appointed by the Minister. The Data Protection Act (Commencement) Order, 2021 brought the Act into operation on , which is the day these provisions began to bind.
Section 62 bars subjecting a data subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects on them or similarly affects them, unless the decision is necessary for entering into or performing a contract, authorised by a written law, or based on the data subject's explicit consent.
Where one of those grounds applies, the controller must put suitable safeguards in place, including the data subject's right to obtain human intervention to express their point of view and contest the decision. Automated processing of sensitive personal data is barred outright unless the data subject has expressly consented, the processing is in the public interest, or a written law permits it with the same safeguards in place.
Section 58 gives a data subject confirmation of whether their personal data is being processed and access, in terms they understand, to the purpose, the categories of data and of recipients, the envisaged storage period or the criteria that set it, the data and its source, and the basic logic involved in any automated decision-making, along with notification of every third party the data was disclosed to and the safeguards put in place; the first copy is free and further copies carry a reasonable administrative fee, and an electronic request is answered in a commonly used electronic format.
Section 59 gives a right to rectification of inaccurate personal data as soon as practicable and to completion of incomplete data.
Section 60 gives a right to erasure as soon as practicable, with the controller obliged to erase without undue delay where the data is no longer necessary, where consent is withdrawn and no other ground exists, where the data subject objects and no overriding legitimate ground exists, where the processing was unlawful, or where a legal obligation requires it, and requires reasonable steps to tell processors and third parties processing data the controller made public.
Section 61 gives a right of objection, including an objection to direct marketing that ends processing for that purpose, and requires the rights to be brought to the data subject's attention clearly and separately at the first communication.
Section 63 gives a right to restriction of processing, section 64 fixes the information to be given when personal data is collected directly from the data subject, section 65 gives a right to data portability, and section 66 requires any rectification, erasure or restriction to be communicated to every recipient the data was disclosed to where practicable. Section 1 leaves commencement to a statutory instrument appointed by the Minister.
The Data Protection Act (Commencement) Order, 2021 brought the Act into operation on , which is the day these provisions began to bind.
Section 18(1) makes a body corporate that contravenes the Part IV processing principles liable on conviction to a fine of up to one hundred million penalty units, valued at ZMW 0.40 each since , or two percent of annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher; section 18(2) makes a natural person liable instead to a fine of up to one million penalty units or imprisonment of up to five years, or both.
Section 55 sets the same two-percent-or-two-million-penalty-unit structure for the Part VIII duties of a data controller, with ten years' imprisonment for a natural person. Section 68 lets a data subject lodge a complaint with the Data Protection Commissioner, and section 69 lets a person aggrieved by the Commissioner's decision appeal to the High Court within thirty days of it.
Section 72 entitles a data subject who has suffered damage from an infringement to compensation from the data controller or data processor as a court determines.
Section 73 makes unlawfully disclosing sensitive personal data an offence carrying up to two hundred thousand penalty units or two years' imprisonment, section 74 lets the Commissioner compound an offence for up to half the maximum fine, section 75 lets a court order forfeiture of the medium holding the data and bar the convicted person from managing any processing for a period, section 76 reaches a director, manager, shareholder or partner who knew of, consented to or connived in the offence, and section 77 sets a residual penalty of up to three hundred thousand penalty units or three years' imprisonment where no specific penalty is provided.
Section 81 has the Commissioner or a licensed independent data auditor audit a data controller's policies and processing annually. Section 1 leaves commencement to a statutory instrument appointed by the Minister. The Data Protection Act (Commencement) Order, 2021 brought the Act into operation on , which is the day these provisions began to bind.
Section 2 defines sensitive personal data to include genetic data and biometric data, child abuse data, a data subject's political opinions, religious or similar beliefs, trade union membership, and physical or mental health or condition.
Section 14 bars anyone from processing sensitive personal data unless the processing is necessary for the establishment, exercise or defence of a legal claim or for a court exercising a judicial function, necessary for preventive or occupational medicine, assessing an employee's working capacity, medical diagnosis, the provision of health or social care or treatment or the management of health or social care systems and services, or necessary for reasons of public interest; the medical ground runs only where the processing is by or under the responsibility of a professional subject to secrecy, and the public-interest ground only where adequate measures to safeguard the data subject's rights and freedoms are in place.
Section 17 lets a child's or a vulnerable person's rights be exercised by a parent, legal guardian or person with parental responsibility, bars a data controller from processing their personal data without that person's consent, requires every reasonable effort to verify that the consent was given or authorised taking available technology into account, and requires appropriate mechanisms for age verification and parental consent in processing a child's personal data.
A vulnerable person is someone aged 18 or above whose ability to make informed decisions about their rights and well-being is temporarily or permanently impaired. Section 1 leaves commencement to a statutory instrument appointed by the Minister. The Data Protection Act (Commencement) Order, 2021 brought the Act into operation on , which is the day these provisions began to bind.
Scraping law2 instruments, 1 in force, 1 no longer in force
Research summary (248 words)
Zambia has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.
The Cyber Crimes Act, 2025 (in force since ) prohibits intentionally and without lawful authority infringing a security measure to access or monitor a computer system, so a person who reads a public, unauthenticated page without defeating an access control falls outside a plain reading of that offence; the repealed Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act, 2021 that it replaced read more broadly, with no express security-measure requirement.
No Zambian court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper. The Copyright and Performance Rights Act, 1994 permits fair dealing for private research and for reporting current events, but Zambia has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text rests only on the general research fair-dealing ground if it can be characterised as private, non-profit research.
Zambia's copyright statute confers no sui generis database right; a compilation is protected only where it is a product of creativity by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents. The Data Protection Act, 2021 applies to personal data without a general carve-out for information that is publicly accessible, and by default requires personal data to be processed and stored on a server or data centre located in Zambia.
No Zambian statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.
Section 3(1) prohibits intentionally and without lawful authority or in excess of authority, infringing a security measure to access or monitor a computer system, or any part of a computer system, of another person. Contravention carries a fine of up to five hundred thousand penalty units, valued at ZMW 0.40 each since (ZMW 200,000), or imprisonment of up to five years, or both.
Because the offence's trigger is infringing a security measure, a person who reads a public, unauthenticated page without defeating any access control falls outside a plain reading of the provision. This section narrows the unauthorised-access offence it replaced: section 49 of the repealed Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act, 2021 penalised accessing or intercepting data without authority or exceeding authorised access, with no express requirement to infringe a security measure.
No longer in force.since repealed Repealed. The page is kept as a record.
Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Section 49(1) prohibited intentionally accessing or intercepting data without authority or permission, or exceeding authorised access, with no express requirement that the person infringe a security measure to do so, so its unauthorised-access offence read more broadly than the offence that replaced it. Contravention carried a fine of up to five hundred thousand penalty units, valued at ZMW 0.40 each since (ZMW 200,000), or imprisonment of up to five years, or both.
The Cyber Security Act, 2025 repealed this Act outright. The repeal took legal effect on when that Act itself came into operation. The equivalent unauthorised-access offence, narrowed to require infringing a security measure, now sits at section 3 of the companion Cyber Crimes Act, 2025.
Zambia enacted a companion Cyber Security Act, 2025 (Act No. 3 of 2025) alongside the Cyber Crimes Act, 2025 (Act No. 4 of 2025) already filed on this jurisdiction's scraping row, confirming that the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act, 2021 (Act No. 2 of 2021), which combined a cybersecurity regime and cybercrime offences in one statute, has been split into two 2025 Acts, one for each half.
Both were assented to on , published in a supplement to the Government Gazette on , and commenced on . The Cyber Security Act, 2025 establishes the Zambia Cyber Security Agency in the Office of the President, continues the Central Monitoring and Co-ordination Centre for lawful interception, and its own section 73 repeals the predecessor Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act, 2021 in full.
Its substantive regime protects critical information and critical information infrastructure: the Agency may, by Gazette notice, designate information or information infrastructure in a critical sector, defence and security, the public sector, banking and finance, health, transport, pensions and insurance, information and communications technology, energy, education, mining, or any other sector it prescribes, and only once that designation issues does a controller face duties to register the designated infrastructure with the Agency within thirty days, host it within Zambia unless the Agency authorises hosting abroad, appoint an information technology auditor annually to perform a cyber audit, and immediately notify the Agency of a cyber security incident affecting the infrastructure, followed by a preliminary report within twelve hours of that notification.
Separately, a person who wants to provide an enumerated cyber security service, penetration testing, a security operations centre, information security risk assessment, vulnerability assessment, incident response, cyber audit, or red teaming, must hold an Agency licence, and a controller may not engage an unlicensed provider. The Agency's inspectors can search, seize, and audit under Part VIII of the Act.
A residual general penalty, section 65, sets a fine of up to five hundred thousand penalty units or five years' imprisonment for an individual, or up to one million penalty units for a body corporate, for an offence under the Act with no specified penalty. No provision of the Act sets a requirement a connected device or software product must meet before it is placed on the market.
Zambia's central bank, the Bank of Zambia, supervises a licensed bank or financial institution's operational risk under the Banking and Financial Services Act, 2017. Zambia has no general reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute reaching a business with no sector or designation gate.
The nearest general security duty is the Data Protection Act, 2021, section 47, which requires a data controller or data processor to implement appropriate security safeguards, including pseudonymisation, encryption, and measures against misuse and unauthorised access, over the personal data it processes; that provision is a security-of-processing article inside a comprehensive personal-data regime and stays on this jurisdiction's privacy row instead of being restated here, following the standing rule for a safeguards duty that is triggered only because a system holds personal data.
The Cyber Crimes Act, 2025 section 3 unauthorised-access offence, already filed on this jurisdiction's scraping row, penalises an intruder's own conduct against a system rather than imposing a duty on the system's operator or manufacturer, and is likewise not restated here. The Zambia Cyber Security Agency designates critical information infrastructure by Gazette notice under section 9(1) of the Cyber Security Act, 2025.
Section 17(2) of the Cyber Security Act, 2025 requires a controller of designated critical information infrastructure to submit a preliminary incident report to the Agency within twelve hours of notifying it of an incident.
Section 9(1) of the Act has the Zambia Cyber Security Agency designate, by notice in the Gazette, information or information infrastructure relevant to a critical sector as critical information or critical information infrastructure. Section 8 of the Act includes among the critical sectors defence and security, the public sector, banking and finance, health, transport, pensions and insurance, information and communications technology, energy, education and mining.
Section 9(2) of the Act requires a controller of designated critical information or critical information infrastructure to comply with the baseline security requirements as may be prescribed. Section 11(1) of the Act requires a controller to register designated critical information or critical information infrastructure with the Agency within thirty days of the designation.
Section 12(1) of the Act requires a controller to host critical information or critical information infrastructure within the Republic, and section 12(2) lets the Agency authorise hosting outside the Republic. Section 14(1) of the Act requires a controller to appoint an information technology auditor each year to perform a cyber audit on critical information or critical information infrastructure.
Section 16 of the Act requires a controller to submit to the Agency a report on cyber security situational awareness in a manner determined by the Agency. Section 14(5) of the Act makes a controller who contravenes section 14 liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding three million penalty units.
Section 17(1) of the Act requires a controller to notify the Agency immediately of a perceived or actual cyber security incident in respect of critical information or critical information infrastructure. Section 17(1)(b) of the Act extends the duty to notify the Agency to a cyber security incident in respect of any computer system under the controller's control that is interconnected or communicates with critical information or critical information infrastructure.
Section 17(2) of the Act requires a controller to submit a preliminary cyber incident report to the Agency within twelve hours of notifying the Agency of the incident. Section 17(3) of the Act requires a controller to submit a detailed cyber security incident report to the Agency as soon as the incident is resolved.
Section 17(6) of the Act makes a controller who contravenes section 17 liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand penalty units or imprisonment not exceeding five years, or both.
Zambia has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognised hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically.
Unlike a civil-law statute that excludes the news of the day from copyright outright, the Copyright and Performance Rights Act, 1994 does not exclude bare facts or news items from copyright by definition; instead, section 21(1)(c) exempts fair dealing with a work for the purpose of reporting current events, in a newspaper, magazine, or similar periodical with a sufficient acknowledgement, or by broadcasting, cable-program inclusion, or use in an audiovisual work.
Whether that exception reaches a systematic aggregator's reproduction of headlines and snippets, as distinct from a newspaper's own current-events report, has not been tested in a reported Zambian decision. The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation entirely, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.
Section 21(1)(c) provides that fair dealing with a work for the purpose of reporting current events does not infringe copyright, whether done in a newspaper, magazine, or similar periodical provided there is a sufficient acknowledgement, or by broadcasting, inclusion in a cable program service, or use in an audiovisual work, for which the Act states no acknowledgement requirement.
Section 21(1)(b) separately exempts fair dealing for criticism or review, provided there is a sufficient acknowledgement. Neither exception is capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold. Whether either reaches a systematic aggregator's reproduction of headlines and snippets, as opposed to a newspaper's own current-events report, has not been tested in a reported Zambian decision.
Zambia has no separate press-publisher neighbouring right, no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime, no recognised hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located case law on hyperlinking or framed display.
The Act's definition of a compilation confers copyright, not a sui generis database right, on a compilation that is a product of creativity by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents, and the Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
AI law
Zambia has no enacted or proposed statute imposing AI-transparency, output-labelling, risk-management, or other AI-specific duties.
The Ministry of Technology and Science published a National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2025-2027 in October 2024, a non-binding policy document that calls for a future National AI Council, sectoral technical working groups, and a National AI Policy, and states that no centralised authority currently oversees AI development in Zambia; no implementing legislation has been identified.
The Data Protection Act, 2021 gives a data subject a right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing that produces legal or similarly significant effects, but that duty attaches to the processing of personal data rather than to an AI system as such, and is addressed in this jurisdiction's privacy-topic document.
As of .
Age gating law
Zambia has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.
The Children's Code Act, 2022 defines "online exploitation" to include grooming, live streaming, and coercing a child for a sexual purpose, and entitles a child to protection from cyberbullying and online exploitation and from exposure to obscene or pornographic material, but neither provision imposes an age-verification or age-gating duty on a service provider.
The Cyber Crimes Act, 2025, and before its repeal the Cyber Security and Cyber Crimes Act, 2021, criminalise producing, distributing, offering, or possessing child pornography and soliciting a child through a computer system, but again address the content and the offender rather than requiring a service to verify a user's age before granting access.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Zambia AI law
No current case law for Zambia privacy law
No current case law for Zambia scraping law
No current case law for Zambia cybersecurity law
No current case law for Zambia communications law
No current case law for Zambia content moderation law
No current case law for Zambia product and AI liability law
No current case law for Zambia digital accessibility law
No current case law for Zambia age gating law
No current case law for Zambia reuse law
Reporting clocks that run here2 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Zambia comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
Immediately notify the Agency, in the manner it determines, of a perceived or actual cyber security incident in respect of critical information or critical information infrastructure, or in respect of any computer system under your control that is interconnected or communicates with it (section 17(1)).
Submit a preliminary cyber incident report to the Agency within twelve hours of notifying the Agency of the incident (section 17(2)).
Notify the Data Protection Commissioner within 24 hours of the breach occurring: section 49(1) runs the period from the security breach itself, not from the moment you learn of it.
Notify the affected data subject as soon as practicable of any security breach affecting their personal data.
As a data processor, notify the data controller as soon as practicable of any security breach affecting personal data you process on its behalf.
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.