United States law applies in VermontVermont is a state of the United States, whose 134 researched instruments are listed on the United States page, not here. The law of Vermont, described on this page below, applies here too.
29 of 31 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 18 in force, 10 not yet in force and 1 no longer in force. As of .
When each starts27 of 29 carry a date, 2 do not. Earlier is before 2016.
in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force
Vermont has no general AI-risk-management or automated-decision-disclosure statute reaching the private sector.
Its operative AI-specific duties are narrow: a sexual-deepfake ban folded into the state's existing nonconsensual-disclosure-of-intimate-images statute, an election-deepfake disclosure duty enacted in 2026, and a 2026 ban on a corporation or entity offering mental health services to the public, including through artificial intelligence, unless a mental health professional provides them or they are part of an approved research study (2026 Act No. 156, H.816, 18 V.S.A. § 7115, in effect since its signing on ).
The Synthetic Media in Elections Act (2026 Act No. 75, S.23) is codified at 17 V.S.A. §§ 2031-2033 and 2041-2042, not in 17 V.S.A. chapter 61 (Campaign Finance). Vermont's child sexual abuse material statute, as currently codified, contains no provision reaching a wholly computer-generated depiction of a fictional minor; its "simulation" definition reaches conduct simulated by or involving an actual child, so no AI-generated-CSAM instrument is recorded for this jurisdiction.
Vermont's other AI governance is government-facing only and is an absence for this profile: the Division of Artificial Intelligence and its Advisory Council (3 V.S.A. §§ 5021 to 5023, established by 2022 Act No. 132 (Adj. Sess.), effective ) review only artificial intelligence systems developed, employed, or procured by State government.
A 2026 act (Act No. 101, H.814) creates no consumer-facing AI disclosure, health-insurer notification, or neural-data consent duty: it declares nonbinding neurological "rights" recognized by the State, extends the government-only Advisory Council's sunset to 2030, and directs the Council to study AI use in health care, human services, and education and report by , so it imposes no private compliance duty.
Section 2606 makes it a crime to knowingly disclose a visual image of an identifiable person who is nude or engaged in sexual conduct, without that person's consent, with intent to harm, harass, or intimidate them, where the disclosure would cause a reasonable person to suffer harm; a second, higher tier applies where the disclosure is made with intent to profit financially.
"Visual image" expressly includes an image created or altered by digitization, and "digitization" is defined as altering an image in a realistic manner using an image or images of a person, including images of a person other than the one depicted, or computer-generated images, so the statute reaches a realistic nonconsensual sexual deepfake of an identifiable person and not only an authentic recording.
Consent to the recording of an image does not by itself constitute consent to disclose it, and a website or app operator may not accept payment to remove or refrain from posting such an image on the depicted person's request.
The section carries statutory exceptions for voluntary public or commercial nudity, disclosures in the public interest (including reporting unlawful conduct), matters of public concern, and a Communications Decency Act section 230 style carve-out for interactive computer services hosting another person's content.
The section was added in 2015 (Act No. 62), amended by 2023 Act No. 161 (adjourned session), section 45, effective , and amended again by 2025 Act No. 89 (adjourned session), section 2, effective ; whether the digitization definition specifically originated in the 2015 enactment or was introduced by the 2023 amendment is not confirmed against the uncodified session laws, so the 2023 amendment's effective date is used here as the date the digitization provisions bind.
Act No. 156 of 2026 (H.816) adds 18 V.S.A. § 7115, which provides that a corporation or entity shall not provide, advertise, or otherwise offer mental health services, including through the use of artificial intelligence, to the public unless the mental health services meet one of two conditions. The first condition is that a mental health professional provides the mental health services.
The second condition is that the mental health services are part of an approved institutional review board or privacy board study. Mental health services are services provided to diagnose, treat, or address an individual's mental health or behavioral health through therapeutic communications and therapeutic decisions.
Artificial intelligence means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments. A violation of the section by a corporation or entity is deemed a violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 9 V.S.A. chapter 63.
The Attorney General has the same authority, and private parties have the same rights and remedies, as provided under 9 V.S.A. chapter 63, subchapter 1. A mental health professional operating within the professional's scope of practice may use artificial intelligence tools that comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, provided that the professional reviews and approves any mental health services.
Engaging in the prohibited use of artificial intelligence under 18 V.S.A. § 7115 is unprofessional conduct for any mental health professional under 3 V.S.A. § 129a. The act states its purpose as safeguarding individuals seeking mental health services in Vermont from psychological harm, including death by suicide, by ensuring that mental health professionals deliver these services and not artificial intelligence systems independently. The Governor signed the act on . The act takes effect on passage.
Enacted as 2026 Act No. 75 (S.23), this act adds a new subchapter to Title 17's elections law defining "synthetic media" as an image, audio recording, or video recording of a person's appearance, speech, or conduct created or intentionally manipulated using digital technology, including artificial intelligence, and "deceptive and fraudulent synthetic media" as synthetic media that appears realistic and either injures a candidate's reputation or provides materially false information to influence an election.
Within 90 days before a Vermont election, a person may not publish, communicate, or distribute synthetic media it knows is deceptive and fraudulent unless the media carries a specified disclosure stating that it has been manipulated or generated by digital technology and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur, shown for the full duration of a video or read at set intervals for an audio recording.
The act exempts a bona fide newscast or news broadcast that acknowledges questions about authenticity, a periodical of general circulation that states the media does not accurately represent the person, satire or parody, and a telecommunications or interactive computer service that only carries another person's content.
A knowing and intentional violation is a civil fine of not more than $1,000.00, escalating to $5,000.00 with intent to cause violence or bodily harm, $10,000.00 for a repeat violation within five years, or $15,000.00 where both aggravating factors apply; a misrepresented candidate may separately seek injunctive relief, and the Attorney General or a State's Attorney may investigate and enforce.
The enacted text adds subchapters 4 and 5 to 17 V.S.A. chapter 35, at sections 2031 to 2033 and 2041 to 2042; it is not part of chapter 61 (Campaign Finance). The act took effect on passage, when Governor Scott signed it on .
Privacy law22 instruments, 12 in force, 9 not yet in force, 1 no longer in force
Research summary (682 words)
Vermont enacted a comprehensive privacy law, the Vermont Data Privacy and Online Surveillance Act (9 V.S.A. ch. 61A), as 2026 Vt. Acts and Resolves Act 145 (S.71), signed ; the Act's own text sets its effective date at . This is Vermont's second attempt: a 2024 predecessor, H.121, passed both chambers but was vetoed, and the Senate's override attempt fell one vote short.
Act 145 requires opt-in consent for sensitive data, including any genetic or biometric data with no purpose qualifier, and gives consumers a broader rights list than New Hampshire, Kentucky, or Rhode Island, enforced solely by the Attorney General with no private right of action, a choice the Act's own uncodified text calls deliberate. Vermont's pre-existing Security Breach Notice Act, 9 V.S.A. sec. 2435, is already in force and unaffected by Act 145's delayed start.
Section 4631(d) of title 18, which restricted the sale, disclosure and use of prescriber-identifying information for marketing, was held unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. on . Vermont's data broker statute, in the version in force until , requires a data broker to register each year with the Secretary of State on or before January 31 and pay a registration fee of $100.00.
From , Vermont's data broker statute requires a data broker to register with the Secretary of State within 30 days of meeting the definition and annually by July 1, pay a registration fee of $900.00 and maintain a bond of $20,000.00. Vermont's data broker statute requires a data broker to develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive information security program, written in one or more readily accessible parts, with administrative, technical and physical safeguards.
Vermont's Genetic Information Privacy Act requires a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company to obtain a consumer's express consent for the collection, use and disclosure of the consumer's genetic data. Section 9332(d) of title 18 of the Vermont Statutes bars genetic testing of an individual, or the release of bodily materials for genetic testing, without the individual's prior written authorization and informed consent, except in the cases 18 V.S.A. section 9332(b) lists.
Section 9333 of title 18 of the Vermont Statutes bars any person from using genetic testing results or genetic information as a condition of, or to affect the terms, conditions or privileges of, employment, membership in a labor organization or professional licensure.
Section 9334 of title 18 of the Vermont Statutes bars underwriting a policy of insurance, or conditioning it, on any requirement or agreement of the individual to undergo genetic testing or on the results of genetic testing of a member of the individual's family. Vermont's Social Security Number Protection Act bars a business from intentionally communicating or otherwise making available to the general public an individual's Social Security number.
Vermont's student privacy subchapter, subchapter 3A of chapter 62 of title 9, bars an operator of a site, service or application used primarily for PreK-12 school purposes from knowingly selling, bartering or renting a student's information.
Section 2444a of title 9 of the Vermont Statutes will require a provider of an educational technology product used in a Vermont school to give the Secretary of State a link to the privacy policy of each product in use in any school, with effect from .
Section 1881(b) of title 18 of the Vermont Statutes bars a covered entity or business associate from disclosing protected health information unless the disclosure is permitted under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Section 1881(c) of title 18 of the Vermont Statutes bars a covered entity or business associate from disclosing identifiable protected health information related to a legally protected health care activity for use in a civil or criminal action, except as section 1881(c)(2) of title 18 provides.
Vermont's Data Broker Security Breach Notice Act, section 2436 of title 9, will require a data broker to notify an affected consumer of a data broker security breach not later than 45 days after discovery or notification, with effect from .
9 V.S.A. sec. 2436Text of 9 V.S.A. section 2436 in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
Not yet in force.from ,in 2 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A data broker must notify a consumer of a data broker security breach affecting the consumer in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than 45 days after the discovery or notification. A data broker must notify the Attorney General of the date of the security breach and the date of discovery and provide a preliminary description of the breach within 14 business days after the data broker's discovery of the breach.
A data broker security breach is an unauthorized acquisition, or a reasonable belief of an unauthorized acquisition, of more than one instance of unencrypted, unredacted brokered personal information maintained by a data broker. A data broker need not give notice under section 2436(b) if it establishes that misuse of the brokered personal information is not reasonably possible and provides notice of that determination as section 2436(c) requires.
A person who violates section 2436 commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2435Vermont Statutes Online, 9 V.S.A. section 2435, unofficial codification maintained by the Vermont General Assembly
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A data collector that owns or licenses computerized personally identifiable information or login credentials must notify an affected Vermont consumer of a security breach in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, but not later than 45 days after discovery. Notice to the Attorney General or the Department of Financial Regulation, as applicable, is faster, with a preliminary description due within 14 business days.
The source page's own history note dates original enactment to 2005, No. 162 (Adj. Sess.), sec. 1, effective , since amended in 2011, 2013 (twice), 2015, and 2019; the source page itself flags it as an unofficial online copy.
The enforcement subsection gives the Attorney General and State's Attorney sole and full authority to enforce a violation by a data collector not licensed or registered with the Department of Financial Regulation, with the remedies they hold under 9 V.S.A. chapter 63, Vermont's Consumer Fraud Act. The Attorney General's June 2020 Security Breach Notice Act Guidance states that the Act does not contain a private right of action. Act 145's own section 2415j, by contrast, expressly denies a private right of action for violations of that subchapter.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2415gofficial Vermont session law, 2026 Vt. Acts & Resolves Act 145 (S.71) as enacted, Vermont General Assembly
Not yet in force.from ,in 14 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A controller must conduct and document a data protection assessment for each processing activity that presents a heightened risk of harm to a consumer, which includes targeted advertising, the sale of personal data, some profiling and the processing of sensitive data. A controller that engages in profiling to make a decision that produces a legal or similarly significant effect concerning a consumer must also conduct an impact assessment for the profiling.
The Attorney General may require a controller to disclose any data protection or impact assessment that is relevant to an investigation, and the controller must make it available to the Attorney General. Data protection and impact assessments are confidential and exempt from disclosure and copying under the Public Records Act. The assessment requirements apply to processing activities created or generated after , and are not retroactive. The Act that enacts the section takes effect on .
Not yet in force.from ,in 14 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
As enacted, it applies to a person conducting business in Vermont, or targeting products or services to Vermont residents, that in the preceding calendar year controlled or processed the personal data of at least 35,000 consumers, controlled or processed the sensitive data of at least 3,000 consumers, or offered for sale the personal data of at least 3,000 consumers, a materially broader sweep than New Hampshire's, Kentucky's, or Rhode Island's thresholds.
Sec. 2415b(c) sets a most-protective-law-controls rule against conflicting statutes, naming the Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. Act 145 (S.71) was signed , following a 2024 predecessor, H.121, that passed both chambers but was vetoed and failed a Senate override by one vote.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2431(a)Text of 9 V.S.A. section 2431 in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A person must not acquire brokered personal information through fraudulent means. A person must not acquire or use brokered personal information for the purpose of stalking or harassing another person, committing a fraud, including identity theft, financial fraud or email fraud, or engaging in unlawful discrimination, including employment discrimination and housing discrimination. The prohibitions in subsection (a) bind any person and have applied since .
A person who violates the section commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9. The Attorney General has the same authority to adopt rules to implement the section and to conduct civil investigations, enter into assurances of discontinuance, bring civil actions and take other enforcement actions as provided under chapter 63, subchapter 1 of that title.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2447Text of 9 V.S.A. sections 2430 and 2447 in the Vermont Statutes Online
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A data broker shall develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive information security program, written in one or more readily accessible parts, that contains administrative, technical and physical safeguards appropriate to the size, scope and type of its business, the amount of resources available to it, the amount of stored data and the need for security and confidentiality of personally identifiable information.
The safeguards must be consistent with the safeguards for protection of personally identifiable information and information of a similar character set forth in other State rules or federal regulations applicable to the data broker. The program must at minimum provide for designation of one or more employees to maintain it.
The program must at minimum identify and assess reasonably foreseeable internal and external risks to the security, confidentiality and integrity of records containing personally identifiable information, and include a process for evaluating and improving the effectiveness of the current safeguards for limiting those risks.
The program must at minimum provide for supervision of service providers by taking reasonable steps to select and retain providers capable of maintaining appropriate security measures and by requiring them by contract to implement and maintain appropriate security measures for personally identifiable information.
The program must at minimum provide for regular review of the scope of the security measures at least annually, or whenever there is a material change in business practices that may reasonably implicate the security or integrity of records containing personally identifiable information. The program must at minimum provide for documentation of responsive actions taken in connection with any incident involving a breach of security and for mandatory post-incident review of events and actions taken.
To the extent technically feasible, the program must at minimum have the computer system security elements the section lists.
Personally identifiable information means a consumer's first name or first initial and last name in combination with one or more listed digital data elements, among them a Social Security number, a driver license number and a financial account number, when the elements are not encrypted, redacted or protected by another method that renders them unreadable or unusable by unauthorized persons.
Until , personally identifiable information does not mean publicly available information that is lawfully made available to the general public from federal, State, or local government records. From , personally identifiable information does not include publicly available information.
From , personally identifiable information does not require a consumer's first name or first initial and last name if any of the listed data elements is sufficient to perform or attempt to perform identity theft against the consumer. A person who violates the section commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9.
The Attorney General has the same authority to adopt rules and to conduct civil investigations, enter into assurances of discontinuance and bring civil actions as provided under chapter 63, subchapter 1 of title 9. From , the Attorney General's authority to adopt rules under subdivision (d)(2) is for implementing the provisions of the section, where it was for implementing the provisions of the chapter before.
Not yet in force.from ,in 2 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Sections 1 and 4 of Act 138 of 2026 take effect on . From that date a data broker must maintain procedures that require prospective users of its brokered personal information to identify themselves, state the purposes for which the information is sought, and certify that the information shall be used for no other purpose.
Before disclosing brokered personal information to a prospective user, a data broker must make a reasonable effort to verify the identity of the prospective user and review the user's stated purposes. A data broker must not disclose brokered personal information to a prospective user if it has reasonable grounds for believing that the information will be used to violate State or federal law or will not be used for the purposes the user stated.
A person who violates the section commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9. The Attorney General has the same authority to adopt rules to implement the section and to conduct civil investigations, enter into assurances of discontinuance, bring civil actions and take other enforcement actions as provided under chapter 63, subchapter 1 of that title.
A data broker is a business, or unit or units of a business, that knowingly collects and sells or licenses to third parties the brokered personal information of a consumer with whom the business does not have a direct relationship. Brokered personal information is a listed set of computerized data elements about a consumer, among them name, address, date of birth, biometric data and Social Security number, if categorized or organized for dissemination to third parties.
Brokered personal information does not include publicly available information to the extent that it is related to a consumer's business or profession.
Developing or maintaining third-party e-commerce or application platforms, providing directory assistance or directory information services for a telecommunications carrier, and providing publicly available information related to a consumer's business or profession or via real-time or near-real-time alert services for health or safety purposes do not make a business a data broker.
Each year, on or before January 31 following a year in which a person meets the definition of data broker, the data broker must register with the Secretary of State and pay a registration fee of $100.00. The registration must state whether the data broker implements a purchaser credentialing process and the number of data broker security breaches it experienced during the prior year.
Where the data broker has actual knowledge that it possesses the brokered personal information of minors, the registration must include a separate statement detailing the practices, databases, sales activities and opt-out policies that apply to that information.
A data broker that fails to register is liable to the State for a civil penalty of $50.00 for each day, not to exceed a total of $10,000.00 for each year, plus an amount equal to the fees due for the period and other penalties imposed by law. The Attorney General may maintain an action in the Civil Division of the Superior Court to collect the penalties and to seek appropriate injunctive relief.
Not yet in force.from ,in 2 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Sections 1 and 4 of Act 138 of 2026 take effect on . Brokered personal information means any information, including derived data and unique identifiers, that is linked or reasonably linkable, alone or in combination with other information, to an identified or identifiable individual or to a device that identifies, is linked to, or is reasonably linkable to one or more identified or identifiable individuals in a household.
Brokered personal information does not include publicly available information. Publicly available information means information made available through federal, state or local government records or to the general public from widely distributed media, or that a data broker has a reasonable basis to believe the consumer has lawfully made available to the general public.
Publicly available information does not include biometric data collected by a business about a consumer without the consumer's knowledge, any obscene visual depiction, genetic data unless the consumer made it publicly available, or intimate images known to be nonconsensual.
A consumer has a direct relationship with a business only where the consumer has intentionally interacted with the business for the purpose of accessing, purchasing, using, requesting or obtaining information about its products or services. A consumer does not have a direct relationship with a business if the purpose of the consumer's engagement is to exercise a consumer right or for the business to verify the consumer's identity.
A business is still a data broker as to the brokered personal information it sells about a consumer that it collected outside of a first-party interaction with the consumer. A data broker must register with the Secretary of State not more than 30 days after meeting the definition of a data broker and then once annually on or before July 1, pay a registration fee of $900.00 and maintain a bond of $20,000.00 that runs to the State for any liability arising under the subchapter.
The registration must state whether the data broker collects the mobile advertising identification number, connected television identification number or vehicle identification number of consumers. The registration must also state whether, in the past year, the data broker has shared consumers' data with or sold it to a foreign actor, the federal government, other state or local governments, law enforcement unless under a subpoena or other court order, or a developer of a GenAI system or model.
A data broker that fails to register is liable to the State for an administrative fine of $200.00 for each day, the fees that were due, and any reasonable costs incurred by the State in the investigation and administration of the action as the court deems appropriate.
A data broker that fails to provide all required registration information must file an amendment not later than 30 days after discovering or receiving notification of the omission and is liable for a civil penalty of $1,000.00 per day thereafter. A data broker that files materially incorrect information in its registration is liable to the State for a civil penalty of $25,000.00 and must correct it within 30 days, or owe an additional $1,000.00 for each day it fails to correct it.
A person who violates the section commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9, and the Attorney General has the authority to conduct civil investigations, enter into assurances of discontinuance and bring civil actions as provided under chapter 63, subchapter 1 of that title. The Secretary of State must maintain a public page with a downloadable spreadsheet of the data brokers that have registered and the information each provided.
In the subchapter a consumer is an individual residing in Vermont and does not include an individual acting in a commercial or employment context or as an employee, owner, director, officer or contractor of a company, partnership, sole proprietorship, nonprofit organization or government agency whose communications or transactions with the data broker occur solely within the context of that individual's role.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2415dofficial Vermont session law text, 2026 Vt. Acts & Resolves Act 145 (S.71) as enacted, Vermont Legislature website
Not yet in force.from ,in 14 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
As enacted, sec. 2415d grants access (including a right to know about profiling used for legal or significant-effect decisions), correction, deletion, portability, opt-out of targeted advertising, sale, and profiling, a profiling-specific explanation and correction-and-reevaluation right for housing decisions, and a right to a list of third parties personal data was sold to, a broader rights list than New Hampshire, Kentucky, or Rhode Island.
A controller must respond without undue delay and not later than 45 days after receipt, with one 45-day extension available.
Not yet in force.from ,in 14 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
As enacted, a violation is a violation of the Vermont Consumer Protection Act, enforced solely by the Attorney General, with a mandatory 60-day cure notice from through under the Act's uncodified Sec. 3.
Sec. 2415j and the Act's uncodified Sec. 2 both state the Act creates no private right of action, and Sec. 2's intent language frames this as a deliberate legislative choice made contingent on the Attorney General receiving adequate enforcement resources, not an oversight. Secondary summaries describing the enacted law as including a limited private right of action for consumers are wrong: the Act's own text, quoted here, controls, and that claim is not carried.
Not yet in force.from ,in 2 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
A person doing business in Vermont as a provider of an educational technology product must, at the time of a filing with the Secretary of State, provide its contact details, a link to the most recent privacy policy and terms and conditions of each product in use in any school, the schools where it operates under a paid contract, a description of each product, and an attestation that each product meets the student privacy subchapter, the Vermont Age-Appropriate Design Code Act and all relevant federal and State privacy laws, including the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.
An educational technology product is any software, application or platform that may collect, process or transmit student data and that is used for teaching and learning purposes in a school in Vermont. Section 2444a takes effect on .
A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company is an entity that sells, markets, interprets or otherwise offers consumer-initiated genetic testing products or services directly to consumers, analyzes genetic data obtained from a consumer other than through a person licensed in the healing arts for diagnosis or treatment of a medical condition, or collects, uses, maintains or discloses genetic data collected or derived from such a product or service.
A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must obtain a consumer's express consent for the collection, use and disclosure of the consumer's genetic data, with separate and express consent for each of the uses section 2421b(a)(2) lists.
A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must make available a plain-language summary of its privacy practices and a prominent and easily accessible privacy notice covering its data collection, consent, use, access, disclosure, maintenance, transfer, security, and retention and deletion practices.
A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must honor a consumer's revocation of consent as soon as practicable and not later than 30 days after the revocation, and must destroy the consumer's biological sample not later than 30 days after receiving a revocation related to its storage or use.
A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices to protect a consumer's genetic data against unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification or disclosure. A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must develop procedures and practices that let a consumer easily access the consumer's genetic data, delete the consumer's account and genetic data, and have the consumer's biological sample destroyed.
Genetic data and biological samples of consumers may not be stored in a country sanctioned by the Office of Foreign Assets Control or designated a foreign adversary, and may be transferred or stored outside the United States only with the consumer's express consent. A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company must obtain separate and express consent for each use of genetic data or the biological sample beyond the primary purpose of the genetic testing or service.
Section 2421b(f) bars a person or public entity from discriminating against a consumer because the consumer exercised any of the consumer's rights under the subchapter. A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company may not disclose a consumer's genetic data to an entity responsible for administering or making decisions about health, life, long-term care or disability insurance or employment, or to an entity that advises one.
A direct-to-consumer genetic testing company or service provider that violates the subchapter commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9. Before a consumer initiates a civil action under section 2421c, the consumer must send the company or service provider a written notice that includes as many details as possible of the alleged violation. The pre-suit notice and cure period in section 1a of Act 135 of 2026 is repealed on .
The Genetic Information Privacy Act does not apply to protected health information collected, maintained, used or disclosed by a covered entity or business associate governed by the federal health privacy, security and breach notification rules.
18 V.S.A. sec. 9334; sec. 9335(a), (b)Text of 18 V.S.A. chapter 217 in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
No policy of insurance offered for delivery or issued in Vermont may be underwritten or conditioned on the basis of any requirement or agreement of the individual to undergo genetic testing, or the results of genetic testing of a member of the individual's family. A violation of section 9334 is an unfair method of competition or unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance in violation of section 4724 of title 8.
A person who violates section 9334 is also subject to the enforcement provisions available under title 8. Insurance means a policy of insurance regulated under title 8, offered or issued in Vermont, including health, life, disability and long-term care insurance policies, hospital and medical service corporation service contracts, and health maintenance organization benefit plans.
A person who intentionally violates subsection 9334(a) shall be imprisoned not more than one year or fined not more than $10,000.00, or both.
18 V.S.A. sec. 9333; sec. 9335(a), (b)Text of 18 V.S.A. chapter 217 in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
No person may, directly or indirectly, use the fact that genetic counseling or testing services were requested or that genetic testing was performed, use genetic testing results or genetic information from a person or a family member, use a diagnosis of a genetic disease derived from a clinical interview and examination, or require genetic testing, as a condition of or to affect the terms, conditions or privileges of employment, membership in a labor organization, or professional licensure, certification or registration.
Employment includes application for employment, and section 9333 does not prohibit use of genetic testing results or genetic information in connection with life, disability income or long-term care insurance provided under an employee benefit plan, subject to the underwriting limitations of section 9334.
No person may disclose to an employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency any genetic testing results or genetic information, that genetic services have been requested, or that genetic testing has been performed, with respect to an employee, labor organization member, professional licensee, certificate holder or registrant.
A person who intentionally violates section 9333 or subsection 9334(a) shall be imprisoned not more than one year or fined not more than $10,000.00, or both. A person aggrieved by a violation of the chapter may bring an action for civil damages, including punitive damages, equitable relief, restitution of wages or other benefits, reinstatement, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and other appropriate relief.
18 V.S.A. secs. 9331, 9332, 9335(b)Text of 18 V.S.A. chapter 217 in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
No person may be required to undergo genetic testing except as chapter 217 of title 18 provides. Under section 9332(d) of title 18, except in the cases subsection (b) lists, genetic testing may not be performed on an individual, and bodily materials may not be released for genetic testing, without the individual's prior written authorization and informed consent, apart from medical research under the conditions subsection (d) states.
Under section 9332(e) of title 18, except in the cases subsection (b) lists, the results of genetic testing, or the fact that an individual has requested genetic services or undergone genetic testing, may be disclosed only under a written authorization executed by the individual tested or by a person authorized by law to act for the individual.
Under section 9332(f) of title 18, when suggesting or requesting that an individual consent to genetic testing, the person must advise the individual that the results may become part of the individual's permanent medical record and may be material to the ability to obtain certain insurance benefits.
In chapter 217 of title 18, genetic testing means a test, examination or analysis that is diagnostic or predictive of a particular heritable disease or disorder and is of a human chromosome or gene, human DNA or RNA, or a human genetically encoded protein. A person aggrieved by a violation of the chapter may bring an action for civil damages, including punitive damages, equitable relief, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and other appropriate relief.
18 V.S.A. sec. 1881(a), (b)Text of 18 V.S.A. chapter 42B in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
A covered entity or business associate may not disclose protected health information unless the disclosure is permitted under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Act 169 of 2016, which added section 1881 to title 18, barred a covered entity from disclosing protected health information unless the disclosure is permitted under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Section 14 of Act 15 of 2023 amended section 1881, including subsection (b). Section 14 of Act 15 of 2023 took effect on . Covered entity and business associate have the meanings given in section 160.103 of title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Protected health information has the meaning given in section 160.103 of title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
18 V.S.A. sec. 1881(c), (d)Text of 18 V.S.A. chapter 42B in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Except as subdivision (2) provides, a covered entity or business associate may not disclose identifiable protected health information related to a legally protected health care activity to a government entity other than the State of Vermont or its political subdivisions or instrumentalities if it has reason to believe the information will be used to investigate any individual for the mere act of seeking, obtaining, providing or facilitating that activity.
Identifiable protected health information related to a legally protected health care activity may not be disclosed for use in a civil or criminal action, a proceeding preliminary to a civil or criminal action, or a probate, legislative or administrative proceeding, except as subdivision (2) provides.
A covered entity or business associate may disclose identifiable protected health information related to a legally protected health care activity where the patient or the patient's conservator, guardian or other authorized legal representative authorizes it, or where another condition in subdivision (2) is met.
A covered entity or business associate is not subject to any civil, criminal or administrative liability or professional disciplinary action for refusing to disclose such information in accordance with subsection (c). Section 6 of Act 20 of 2025 amended section 1881, including subsection (c). Act 20 of 2025 took effect on passage and was signed . Section 1881 was amended by Act 15 of 2023, effective , and by Act 20 of 2025, effective .
18 V.S.A. sec. 4631(d)Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's copy of 18 V.S.A. sec. 4631
No longer in force.in forcestruck down Struck down by a court on . The page is kept as a record.
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Section 4631 of title 18, Confidentiality of prescription information, was added by the 2007 act numbered 80 and most recently amended by the 2011 act numbered 136, effective .
Subsection (d) provides that a health insurer, a self-insured employer, an electronic transmission intermediary, a pharmacy, or other similar entity shall not sell, license, or exchange for value regulated records containing prescriber-identifiable information, nor permit the use of regulated records containing prescriber-identifiable information for marketing or promoting a prescription drug, unless the prescriber consents as provided in subsection (c).
Subsection (d) also provides that pharmaceutical manufacturers and pharmaceutical marketers shall not use prescriber-identifiable information for marketing or promoting a prescription drug unless the prescriber consents as provided in subsection (c).
Subsection (e) provides that the prohibitions in subsection (d) do not apply to the use of regulated records for the limited purposes of pharmacy reimbursement, prescription drug formulary compliance, patient care management, utilization review, or health care research, among other listed exceptions.
Subsection (f) provides that the Attorney General may file an action in Superior Court for a violation of the section, with the same authority to investigate and to obtain remedies as if the action were brought under the Vermont Consumer Protection Act. The Supreme Court held in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. on that section 4631(d) must be subjected to heightened judicial scrutiny and that the law cannot satisfy that standard.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2440Text of 9 V.S.A. section 2440 in the Vermont Statutes Online, the General Assembly's unofficial copy of the Vermont Statutes Annotated
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Except as subsection (c) provides, a business may not intentionally make an individual's Social Security number available to the general public, intentionally print or imbed it on an access card, require its transmission over the Internet unless the connection is secure or the number is encrypted, require its use to access an Internet website without a password or other authentication device, print it on materials mailed to the individual, or disclose it to a third party without written consent when it knows or should know the third party lacks a legitimate purpose.
Section 2440(b) does not apply when a Social Security number is included in an application or in documents related to an enrollment process, or to establish, amend or terminate an account, contract or policy.
The State, a State agency or political subdivision, and an agent or employee of the State may not collect a Social Security number from an individual unless authorized or required by law, State or federal regulation or grant agreement, or unless the collection is related to the performance of the agency's duties and responsibilities as prescribed by law.
A person has the right to ask a town clerk or clerk of court to remove from an image or copy of an official record placed on a publicly available Internet website the person's Social Security number and the other identifiers section 2440(f) lists.
The Attorney General and State's Attorney have sole and full authority to investigate, enforce, prosecute, obtain and impose remedies for violations of the subchapter, as they have under chapter 63 of title 9, by businesses and by the State, State agencies and political subdivisions, other than a person or entity licensed or registered with the Department of Financial Regulation.
The Department of Financial Regulation has full authority to investigate and enforce violations of the subchapter by a person or entity licensed or registered with the Department under title 8 or title 9.
An operator is the operator of an Internet website, online service, online application or mobile application with actual knowledge that it is used primarily for PreK-12 school purposes and was designed and marketed for PreK-12 school purposes.
An operator may not knowingly engage in targeted advertising on its site, service or application, or on any other, based on information, including covered information and persistent unique identifiers, acquired because of the use of its site, service or application for PreK-12 school purposes. An operator may not knowingly use information created or gathered by its site, service or application to amass a profile about a student, except in furtherance of PreK-12 school purposes.
An operator may not knowingly sell, barter or rent a student's information, including covered information, except in the purchase, merger or other acquisition of the operator by another entity that complies with the subchapter for previously acquired student information. An operator may not knowingly disclose covered information unless the disclosure is made for one of the purposes section 2443a(a)(4) lists and is proportionate to the identifiable information necessary to accomplish the purpose.
An operator must implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the covered information, delete a student's covered information within a reasonable time if the school or school district requests deletion, and publicly disclose and provide the school with material information about its collection, use and disclosure of covered information.
Subchapter 3A of chapter 62 of title 9 does not apply to general audience Internet websites, online services, online applications or mobile applications, even if login credentials created for an operator's site, service or application may be used to access them. Until , a person who violates a provision of chapter 62 of title 9 commits an unfair and deceptive act in commerce in violation of section 2453 of title 9.
From , section 2443f(b) gives the Attorney General the same authority to adopt rules, conduct civil investigations, enter into assurances of discontinuance and bring civil actions as chapter 63, subchapter 1 of title 9 provides.
9 V.S.A. sec. 2415a(b)(3), (47)official Vermont session law text, 2026 Vt. Acts & Resolves Act 145 (S.71) as enacted, Vermont Legislature website
Not yet in force.from ,in 14 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
As enacted, sensitive data means personal data that includes data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, sex life, sexual orientation, status as nonbinary or transgender, or citizenship or immigration status; data revealing a mental or physical health condition, diagnosis, disability, or treatment; consumer health data; genetic or biometric data or information derived therefrom; personal data collected from an individual the controller has actual knowledge, or willfully disregards, is a child; precise geolocation data; neural data; a consumer's financial account number, financial account login information, or credit card or debit card number that, in combination with any required access or security code, password, or credential, would allow access to a consumer's financial account; and a government-issued identification number, including, but not limited to, Social Security number, passport number, State identification card number, or driver's license number, that applicable law does not require to be publicly displayed.
Genetic or biometric data carries no unique-identification qualifier, unlike New Hampshire's, Kentucky's, and Rhode Island's sensitive-data clauses.
"Biometric data" lists more enumerated modalities than those three states, including iris or retina scans, fingerprints, facial or hand geometry, vein patterns, voiceprints, and gait, and excludes a photograph or recording, or data generated from one, only until that data is generated to identify a specific individual, the same clawback structure New Hampshire, Kentucky, and Rhode Island each use.
Vermont diverges from the federal baseline with its own Computer Crimes Act, which makes unauthorized access a crime under a bare knowing-and-intentional, without-lawful-authority test, with no built-in exception for the absence of malicious intent or deceptive means of the kind some other states carry.
Related, more serious offenses reach fraudulent access, alteration or damage, and theft or destruction, each with penalties tiered by the value of the loss, plus a private civil cause of action for anyone damaged by a violation.
No Vermont statute or reported appellate decision addresses terms-of-service enforceability, a state-specific database right, the legal weight of robots.txt for automated collection, or how the unauthorized-access statute applies to a public-facing website or automated collection specifically; those questions rest on ordinary Vermont contract and tort doctrine, untested against scraping.
Vermont's data broker act (9 V.S.A. chapter 62, subchapter 5) is a privacy-topic instrument already recorded for this jurisdiction and is not restated here.
Section 4102 makes it unlawful for a person to knowingly and intentionally and without lawful authority access any computer, computer system, computer network, computer software, computer program, or data contained in one, punishable as a misdemeanor by up to six months' imprisonment or a $500.00 fine, or both.
Unlike Virginia's computer trespass statute, section 4102 carries no built-in exception for conduct that lacks malicious intent or a deceptive means; it is a bare without-lawful-authority test closer to the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act's own wording.
Related offenses in the same chapter reach access for fraudulent purposes (section 4103), alteration, damage, or interference (section 4104), and theft or destruction (section 4105), each requiring an additional element (a fraud scheme, or actual damage, deletion, or taking) that ordinary, non-disruptive automated collection does not supply on its own; penalties for those sections escalate with the value of the loss, up to ten years' imprisonment and a $25,000.00 fine where the loss or value exceeds $500.00.
A person damaged by a violation of the chapter may bring a civil action for damages, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees under section 4106. Its history note names 1999, No. 35, § 1 as the act that added it. No day on which that act came into force has been located.
Vermont's private-sector security posture rests on one enacted general-application statute, the Document Safe Destruction Act's disposal duty at 9 V.S.A. section 2445, plus two enacted but role-gated security-program duties, on data brokers (this jurisdiction's privacy-topic row) and on insurance licensees (filed as a row of its own, flagged for an insurer); Vermont has enacted no connected-device or product-security statute and no general private-sector duty to report an exploited vulnerability or a security incident to an authority.
9 V.S.A. section 2445, added by 2005, No. 162 (Adj.
Sess.), section 1, effective , requires a business, defined broadly as any sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, association, limited liability company or other group however organized, including a financial institution, but never the State, a State agency or a political subdivision of the State, to take all reasonable steps to destroy or arrange for the destruction of a customer's records containing personal information (a signature, Social Security number, physical description, passport number, driver's license or State ID number, insurance policy number, or bank, credit or debit card number) once no longer retained, by shredding, erasing or otherwise rendering it unreadable, for the purpose of ensuring the security and confidentiality of the information, protecting against threats or hazards to its security or integrity, and protecting against unauthorized access; a business that itself disposes of personal financial information for others carries the same duty as to the personal information it handles on their behalf.
The duty does not reach a bank, credit union or other financial institution already subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's privacy and security provisions, a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant health insurer or facility, or an FCRA-compliant consumer reporting agency, and it is a disposal duty only: the section imposes no ongoing obligation to safeguard personal information that remains in active use, so it is narrower than a full information-security-program mandate such as New York's SHIELD Act 899-bb or Massachusetts's 201 CMR 17.00.
No source read (9 V.S.A. section 2435, the Security Breach Notice Act, searched directly for "safeguard" and "reasonable security" and read in full) states any such ongoing safeguards duty on Vermont businesses generally; section 2435 is a pure breach-notification statute (already this jurisdiction's privacy row, the standing seam rule) and contains no affirmative security-program requirement of its own.
Separately, 9 V.S.A. section 2447, the Data Broker Duty to Protect Information, added by 2017, No. 171 (Adj.
Sess.), section 2, effective , requires a data broker, defined at 9 V.S.A. section 2430(4)(A) as a business that knowingly collects and sells or licenses to third parties the brokered personal information of a consumer with whom it has no direct relationship, to develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program with administrative, technical and physical safeguards, and prescribes minimum program features (a designated responsible employee, a documented risk assessment, employee training, vendor oversight, physical access restrictions, annual review, and post-incident review) and minimum computer-system controls (secure authentication, access controls, encryption of transmitted and portable-device data, firewalls, patching, malware protection); a violation is deemed an unfair and deceptive act in commerce under 9 V.S.A. section 2453, enforced by the Attorney General.
Because a Vermont consumer who "sustains damages or injury as a result of any ... practices prohibited by section 2453" may sue under 9 V.S.A. section 2461(b), a violation of the data-broker security duty appears to carry a private remedy that the narrower section 2445 disposal duty, whose own enforcement clause borrows chapter 63's remedies without the same deeming language, does not.
The bound party, "data broker," is a defined business model (collecting and selling data about people with whom the business has no direct relationship) that no value in the LexLint activity vocabulary currently expresses, so no instrument is filed for section 2447 here, per the profile's standing rule for a regime whose bound party no declared activity can express; a data-broker document should add it once a profile fact for that role exists.
Act 138 (H.211), enacted in 2026 with multiple effective dates beginning , revises this chapter's data-broker definitions, adds a duty to verify a recipient and its purposes before disclosing brokered personal information, adds a separate Data Broker Security Breach Notice Act (a breach-notification duty, already privacy-shaped under this topic's own seam rule), and substantially raises data-broker registration fees and registration-violation penalties; nothing in the Act's official summary indicates it rewrites the information-security-program duty in section 2447 itself, so that duty's content as described here is read from the current statute text rather than from the amending act.
Vermont also binds a defined sector through 8 V.S.A. section 4728, the Vermont Insurance Data Security Law, added by 2021, No. 139 (Adj.
Sess.), section 20, and operative (with a one- or two-year phase-in for particular subsections): a licensee, any person licensed, authorized or registered under Vermont's insurance laws, must develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive written information security program based on a documented risk assessment, with named administrative, technical and physical safeguards, board oversight, vendor due diligence, and a written incident response plan for a "cybersecurity event" (unauthorized access to, or disruption or misuse of, an information system or nonpublic information); the licensee must investigate a cybersecurity event, keep records of it for five years, and certify compliance to the Commissioner of Financial Regulation annually by April 15, but the section as read here contains no separate clock-bound duty to notify the Commissioner of an individual cybersecurity event the way many other states' adoptions of the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law do; a licensee with fewer than twenty employees is exempt, and the section "may not be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for violation of its provisions," enforced instead by the Commissioner under 8 V.S.A. sections 3661 and 4726.
Section 4728's program duty is filed as a row of its own, flagged for an insurer; it carries no notice to the Commissioner, only an annual certification.
On product requirements, Vermont has enacted no connected-device or IoT security statute: H.630 (2026), "An act relating to adopting minimum security standards for connected devices," sponsored by Rep. Barbara Rachelson, was read a first time and referred to the House Committee on Commerce and Economic Development on , had one recorded committee hearing (introduction only) on , and shows no further recorded action or enactment as of this reading, so this is a researched absence rather than a gap in coverage, the same shape as New York's still-pending General Business Law 390-d. On vulnerability and incident reporting, Vermont has no general private-sector duty to report an exploited vulnerability or a security incident to an authority.
The Cybersecurity Advisory Council, established under 20 V.S.A. chapter 208 (Act 71) and continued and expanded by Act 138 through 2033, is charged to develop a statewide cybersecurity strategic plan, evaluate readiness, share best practices "as a resource for State government, Vermont businesses, and the public," and "provide technical capabilities, training, and advice to local government and the private sector," but it imposes no compliance duty, reporting obligation or penalty on a private business and belongs with government-accountability material rather than as a row in this profile's private-sector scope.
On enforcement generally, the Attorney General and State's Attorneys enforce most of this chapter under the Vermont Consumer Protection Act, chapter 63 of Title 9, which carries a civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 for each unfair or deceptive act or practice in commerce (9 V.S.A. section 2458(b)(1)); no published enforcement record specific to a security-shaped duty in this chapter was located in the sources checked.
Vermont's Insurance Data Security Law requires each licensee to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.
Each licensee must develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program that is based on the licensee's risk assessment and contains administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for the protection of nonpublic information and the licensee's information system.
A licensee is a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered or required to be licensed, authorized, or registered pursuant to the insurance laws of Vermont, but not a captive insurance company, a purchasing group or risk retention group chartered, or a licensee domiciled in another jurisdiction that is acting as an assuming insurer for a licensee domiciled in Vermont.
A licensee must establish, as part of its information security program, a written incident response plan designed to promptly respond to and recover from any cybersecurity event. Each insurer domiciled in Vermont must annually submit to the commissioner, on or before April 15, a written statement certifying that the insurer is compliant with the requirements of the subsection.
A licensee that learns that a cybersecurity event has or may have occurred must conduct a prompt investigation, or have a designated outside vendor or service provider conduct it. A licensee with fewer than 20 employees, including any independent contractors, is exempt from subsection (d) of the section. A licensee has one year from the effective date of the section to implement subsection (d), other than subdivision (d)(6), and two years to implement subdivision (d)(6).
The section takes effect on . A licensee that violates the section may be penalized in accordance with section 3661 or 4726 of Title 8, as appropriate.
A business must take all reasonable steps to destroy or arrange for the destruction of a customer's records within its custody or control that contain personal information no longer to be retained, by shredding, erasing or otherwise modifying the personal information to make it unreadable or indecipherable, for the purpose of ensuring the security and confidentiality of the information, protecting against anticipated threats or hazards to its security or integrity, and protecting against unauthorized access to or use of it that could cause substantial harm or inconvenience to a customer.
A business is defined to include any sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, association, limited liability company or other group however organized and whether or not operated for profit, including a financial institution, but never the State, a State agency or a political subdivision of the State.
An entity in the business of disposing of personal financial information that conducts business in Vermont, or that disposes of Vermont residents' personal information, carries the same duty as to the information it handles on another business's behalf, by implementing and monitoring policies and procedures that protect against unauthorized access during and after collection, transportation and disposal.
The duty is limited to disposal, imposing no ongoing obligation to safeguard personal information that remains in active use, and it does not apply to a bank, credit union or other financial institution already subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act's privacy and security provisions, a health insurer or facility already compliant with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)'s privacy and security standards, or a consumer reporting agency already compliant with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
The Attorney General and State's Attorneys have sole enforcement authority over a business not licensed or registered with the Department of Financial Regulation, and the Department of Financial Regulation has authority over one that is; both prosecute a violation and obtain remedies as the Attorney General and State's Attorneys have under Vermont's Consumer Protection Act, chapter 63 of this title, which sets a civil penalty of up to $10,000.00 for each unfair or deceptive act or practice in commerce.
The section does not itself declare a violation an unfair and deceptive act under 9 V.S.A. section 2453 the way the data-broker security duty at section 2447 does, so whether the Consumer Protection Act's private right of action, 9 V.S.A. section 2461(b), reaching damages caused by practices prohibited by section 2453, extends to a violation of this section is not settled by the text read here.
Vermont has enacted an Age-Appropriate Design Code Act (S.69, Act 63 of 2025, signed ), its second attempt after Governor Scott vetoed a similar 2024 bill (H.121) over First Amendment concerns. The Act takes effect ; the Attorney General's rulemaking authority took effect , with rules on age assurance and prohibited design practices due by . The Act has not yet been challenged in court as of this date.
Vermont has not enacted an adult content age verification law, a social media minor-access law, or an app store accountability law.
Not yet in force.from ,in 2 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Requires covered businesses offering online services, products, or features reasonably likely to be accessed by minors under 18 to minimize collection and use of covered minors' personal data, refrain from using minors' data in algorithmic recommendation systems except at the minor's request, bar unsignaled monitoring or location tracking of minors, prohibit push notifications to minors between midnight and 6:00 a.m., and protect age assurance data. Violations are unfair and deceptive acts in commerce under 9 V.S.A. section 2453.
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
Reuse law
Vermont has enacted no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, and no state-specific hot-news or misappropriation statute. No state counterpart to California's since-died Journalism Preservation Act or to the federal Journalism Competition and Preservation Act was introduced in the 2025-2026 biennium.
No reported Vermont appellate decision addresses snippet reproduction, hyperlinking or framing of news content, or a state-law misappropriation claim over time-sensitive reporting. Snippet reproduction, linking, and text-and-data-mining questions rest on the federal Copyright Act baseline already covered at the national level; Vermont adds nothing to it.
As of .
Reporting clocks that run here18 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Vermont comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
If you are a data broker, notify each consumer affected by a data broker security breach in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, and not later than 45 days after discovery or notification, consistent with the needs of law enforcement and with any measures necessary to determine the scope of the breach and restore the reasonable integrity, security and confidentiality of the data system.
Notify the Attorney General of the date of the breach and the date of discovery and provide a preliminary description of the breach within 14 business days after discovery, and when you notify consumers tell the Attorney General the number of Vermont consumers affected, if known, and give it a copy of the consumer notice.
Notify an affected Vermont consumer of a security breach in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, and no later than 45 days after discovery.
Notify the Attorney General or the Department of Financial Regulation, as applicable, of the date of the breach and the date of discovery, with a preliminary description of the breach, within 14 business days of discovering the breach or when you notify consumers, whichever is sooner (unless, having sworn to the Attorney General in writing before the breach that you maintain written security policies and procedures, you notify the Attorney General before notifying consumers).
The law of the United States, which applies in Vermont
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System within one hour after discovery of a cyberattack that adversely impacted safety-related or important-to-safety functions, security functions, or emergency preparedness functions (including offsite communications), or that compromised support systems and equipment resulting in adverse impacts to those functions.
Also notify within one hour after discovery of a cyberattack that adversely impacted the safety, security, and emergency preparedness functions performed by digital assets described in 10 CFR 73.77(a)(1)(ii).
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center within four hours after discovery of a cyberattack that could have caused such an adverse impact, after discovery of a suspected or actual cyberattack initiated by personnel with physical or electronic access to the systems in scope, or after notifying a local, State, or other Federal agency of an event related to your cyber security program that does not otherwise require notification.
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center within eight hours after receipt or collection of information regarding observed behavior, activities, or statements that may indicate intelligence gathering or pre-operational planning related to a cyberattack against the systems in scope.
Use the site corrective action program to record vulnerabilities, weaknesses, failures and deficiencies in your cyber security program, and the notifications you make, within twenty-four hours of their discovery.
Once the final rule takes effect, report a covered cyber incident to the Agency not later than 72 hours after your organization reasonably believes that the covered cyber incident has occurred.
Once the final rule takes effect, report a ransom payment to the Agency not later than 24 hours after your organization makes the payment, even where the underlying ransomware attack is not itself a covered cyber incident.
Once the final rule takes effect, promptly submit an update to a previously submitted covered cyber incident report whenever substantial new or different information becomes available or a ransom payment is later made, continuing until your organization notifies the Agency that the incident has concluded and been fully mitigated and resolved, and preserve data relevant to the incident or payment under the procedures the final rule establishes.
Upon any responsible SCI personnel having a reasonable basis to conclude that an SCI event has occurred, begin appropriate corrective action and notify the Commission of the SCI event immediately.
Within 24 hours of that conclusion, submit a written notification to the Commission, made on a good faith, best efforts basis, that describes the SCI event and the systems affected and, to the extent available, your assessment of the market participants potentially affected, the potential impact on the market, and the steps you have taken, are taking or plan to take.
If the SCI event is resolved and the investigation closed within 30 calendar days, submit a final written notification within five business days after resolution. If not, submit an interim written notification within 30 calendar days after the event, and a final one within five business days after resolution and closure.
If your organization is a banking organization, notify your primary federal banking regulator, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, or the FDIC, whichever supervises it, about a notification incident, as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after your organization determines that a notification incident has occurred.
A notification incident is the subset of computer-security incidents that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, your ability to serve customers, a business line, or an operation whose failure would threaten the financial stability of the United States, so a computer-security incident that falls short of that threshold does not by itself start this clock.
If your organization is a bank service provider, notify at least one bank-designated point of contact at each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible after your organization determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to that banking organization for a period of four hours or more.
This duty carries a standard, as soon as possible, rather than a fixed number of hours to notify by, and that disruption threshold is what engages the duty rather than a period to notify within.
If you are a developer or provider of a frontier AI model, or an operator of critical infrastructure that uses an AI model to manage industrial control systems or other operational technologies, report any confirmed AI safety incident or AI security incident within 30 days of confirmation, and within 72 hours if the incident poses an imminent threat to national security, critical infrastructure or public safety.
If your organization is a federally insured credit union, notify the NCUA-designated point of contact of a reportable cyber incident by email, telephone, or another method the NCUA prescribes, so that the NCUA receives the notification as soon as possible and no later than 72 hours after your organization reasonably believes it has experienced a reportable cyber incident.
Where the reportable cyber incident is a disruption of business operations or unauthorized access to sensitive data facilitated through, or caused by, a compromise of a credit union service organization, cloud service provider, or other third-party data hosting provider, or by a supply chain compromise, the NCUA must receive the notification within 72 hours of your organization being notified by the third party if that is sooner.
Send the notice as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days, after becoming aware that unauthorized access to or use of customer information has occurred or is reasonably likely to have occurred, delaying it only for the period the United States Attorney General specifies where the Attorney General determines that notice poses a substantial risk to national security or public safety (17 CFR 248.30(a)(4)(iii)).
Maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to require oversight, including through due diligence and monitoring, of service providers, including that a service provider notify you as soon as possible, and no later than 72 hours, after becoming aware of a breach in security resulting in unauthorized access to a customer information system it maintains (17 CFR 248.30(a)(5)(i)).
Rapidly report a cyber incident to the Department of Defense within 72 hours of discovering it, at the Department's DIBNet portal (dibnet.dod.mil), using a DoD-approved medium assurance certificate that you must obtain before you need to file a report.
Make those policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each service provider takes appropriate measures to protect against unauthorized access to or use of customer information, and to notify you as soon as possible, but no later than 72 hours after becoming aware that a breach in security has occurred resulting in unauthorized access to a customer information system the service provider maintains.
If your organization is an Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting company, determine, without unreasonable delay after you discover a cybersecurity incident, whether the incident is material, and if it is, file a Form 8-K under Item 1.05 within four business days after you make that determination.
If the information called for in Item 1.05 is not determined or is unavailable when you file, state that in the filing and file an amendment to the Form 8-K within four business days after you determine it or it becomes available.
After you reasonably determine that a breach of your customers' CPNI has occurred, electronically notify the United States Secret Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation through the central reporting facility as soon as practicable, and in no event later than seven business days (47 CFR 64.2011(b)).
Do not notify customers or disclose the breach where the relevant investigating agency directs you in writing not to, for an initial period of up to 30 days that the agency may extend (47 CFR 64.2011(b)(3)).
If you are a vendor of personal health records (an entity that offers or maintains an electronic record of health information that can draw information from multiple sources and is managed, shared and controlled by or primarily for the individual) or a PHR related entity, notify each affected individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, in plain language and without unreasonable delay, no later than 60 calendar days after you discover a breach of security of unsecured PHR identifiable health information.
Notify prominent media outlets serving a State or jurisdiction, without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after you discover the breach, when the unsecured PHR identifiable health information of 500 or more of its residents is, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired during the breach.
If you are a third party service provider, notify the official designated in a written contract by the vendor of personal health records or PHR related entity you serve (or else a senior official of that vendor or entity), without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after you discover the breach; identify each customer of that vendor or entity whose unsecured PHR identifiable health information has been, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired during the breach; and obtain acknowledgment that the notice was received.
Notify affected individuals without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovering a breach of unsecured protected health information.
For a breach of unsecured protected health information involving more than 500 residents of a State or jurisdiction, notify prominent media outlets serving that State or jurisdiction without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.
If you are a business associate, notify the covered entity of a breach of unsecured protected health information without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.
If your organization is a derivatives clearing organization, notify staff of the Division of Clearing and Risk promptly of any hardware or software malfunction, security incident, or targeted threat that materially impairs, or creates a significant likelihood of material impairment of, automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, and of any activation of your business continuity and disaster recovery plan.
If your organization is a designated contract market, notify Commission staff promptly of all cyber security incidents or targeted threats that actually or potentially jeopardize automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, as well as electronic trading halts and significant systems malfunctions and activations of your business continuity-disaster recovery plan.
If your organization is a swap execution facility, notify Commission staff promptly of all cyber security incidents or targeted threats that actually or potentially jeopardize automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, as well as electronic trading halts and material system malfunctions and activations of your business continuity-disaster recovery plan.
Evidence of sabotage, subversive activity, or an actual or threatened cyber incident involving or endangering any vessel, harbor, port, or waterfront facility must be reported immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (for any cyber incident), and the Captain of the Port, or to their respective representatives.
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.