United States law applies in AlabamaAlabama is a state of the United States, whose 134 researched instruments are listed on the United States page, not here. The law of Alabama, described on this page below, applies here too.
All 22 named instruments researched to a stage, across five of the ten areas of law we track: 16 in force and 6 not yet in force. As of .
When each starts16 of 22 carry a date, 6 do not. Earlier is before 2015.
in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force
Alabama's AI-content transparency duty remains its election deepfake law, Ala. Code section 17-5-16.1, in force since : distributing AI-produced materially deceptive media of a candidate within 90 days of an election is unlawful unless the distributor carries a clear and conspicuous disclaimer, so the operative duty is a labeling and disclosure one rather than an outright ban.
The Alabama Child Protection Act of 2024 (Act 2024-98, HB 168) amended Ala. Code sections 13A-12-190, 13A-12-191, 13A-12-192, 13A-12-193, 13A-12-194, 13A-12-196, 13A-12-197, and 13A-12-198, and repealed section 13A-12-195, so that the definition of child sexual abuse material expressly reaches a virtually indistinguishable depiction created, altered, or produced by digital, computer-generated, or other means: dissemination, public display, advertising, and soliciting such material are each a Class B felony; possession with intent to disseminate is a Class B felony and simple possession a Class C felony; and production, or a parent's or guardian's knowing permission of a minor's use in production, are each a Class A felony, all effective .
That statute is a content prohibition rather than a transparency or labeling duty, but because it binds any person's production, dissemination, or possession of an AI-generated or AI-indistinguishable depiction, it is catalogued here as an AI prohibited-practices instrument.
Senate Bill 63 (2026), in effect since , bars a health benefit plan provider from letting artificial intelligence alone decide a prior-authorization request: an AI-assisted determination must rest on the enrollee's own medical history and clinical circumstances rather than a group dataset, a licensed physician or other qualified clinician must make the final call on any adverse determination, and the provider must certify annually to the Department of Insurance that its artificial intelligence does not discriminate against any subscriber group; enforcement is administrative, by the Department of Insurance, with a fine of up to $5,000 for a violation occurring with the frequency of a general business pattern or practice; this instrument cites the enacted act directly rather than a Code of Alabama section.
Alabama's comprehensive privacy statute, the Alabama Personal Data Protection Act (HB 351, 2026), separately includes a right to opt out of profiling used for solely automated significant decisions; because that duty attaches to personal data rather than to an AI system as such, it remains a privacy-topic instrument, recorded there and not here.
Three AI-related bills died at sine die on , without floor votes and are not catalogued as instruments: House Bill 324 would have required AI chatbot operators to verify users' ages, adopt harmful-output safeguards, and meet heightened rules for a chatbot acting as a therapy or mental-health companion; House Bill 325 would have made an AI chatbot operator's failure to disclose that a user is talking to a bot an unfair or deceptive trade practice; and Senate Bill 129 would have required disclosure of AI-generated content.
No other 2025 or 2026 Alabama enactment imposing an AI-transparency, output-labeling, prohibited-practice, or AI-system-governance duty was located.
The Alabama Child Protection Act of 2024 amended Alabama Code sections 13A-12-190, 13A-12-191, 13A-12-192, 13A-12-193, 13A-12-194, 13A-12-196, 13A-12-197, and 13A-12-198, and repealed section 13A-12-195, so that the definition of child sexual abuse material expressly includes a virtually indistinguishable depiction created, altered, or produced by digital, computer generated, or other means.
A person who knowingly disseminates or publicly displays child sexual abuse material is guilty of a Class B felony, as is a person who knowingly advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits by any means material that reflects, or is intended to cause another to believe, depicts an actual individual under 18 engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
A person who knowingly possesses child sexual abuse material with intent to disseminate it is guilty of a Class B felony, and simple possession is a Class C felony. A parent or guardian who knowingly permits or allows a child, ward, or dependent under 18 to be used in producing child sexual abuse material is guilty of a Class A felony, as is a person who knowingly produces the material.
An individual who commits any of these offenses, or the related private-image offense at section 13A-6-240, is civilly liable to the individual depicted, with actual damages, costs and attorney fees, and punitive damages available on clear and convincing evidence of wantonness or malice.
No civil action may be brought for actions taken to prevent, detect, protect against, report, or respond to the production, generation, incorporation, or synthesization of child sexual abuse material through artificial intelligence. The amendments took effect .
A health benefit plan provider that uses artificial intelligence to determine medical necessity for a request for prior authorization must base the determination on the enrollee's own medical history, the clinical circumstances the treating health care provider presents, and other clinical information in the enrollee's medical record.
The provider must certify annually to the Alabama Department of Insurance that the artificial intelligence does not rely on a group dataset, is applied fairly and equitably consistent with applicable federal guidance, and does not discriminate against any subscriber group or enrollee.
A determination to deny, delay, or modify a prior-authorization request based on medical necessity must always be made by a licensed physician or other health care professional competent to evaluate the artificial intelligence's recommendation in light of the enrollee's own clinical circumstances.
The provider must make prominent written disclosure of its use of artificial intelligence in utilization review in its policies and procedures, periodically review the outcomes for accuracy, and keep patient data used in that review within its intended purpose under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
The Department of Insurance may investigate an alleged violation and order corrective changes to the provider's procedures, and for a violation occurring with the frequency of a general business pattern or practice, may impose an administrative fine of up to $5,000 or suspend or revoke the provider's certificate of authority.
A person may not knowingly distribute, or agree with another to distribute, materially deceptive media, defined as an image, audio, or video produced by artificial intelligence that falsely depicts a candidate engaging in speech or conduct that did not occur, within 90 days of an election, where the distribution intends to harm the candidate's reputation or electoral prospects or to change how electors vote.
The duty is a disclosure one: a distributor avoids the prohibition entirely by including a specified clear and conspicuous disclaimer that the media has been manipulated by technical means, with format-specific rules for video, audio, and still images. A violation is a Class A misdemeanor, rising to a Class D felony on a second or subsequent conviction within five years.
The Attorney General, the depicted individual, an injured or threatened candidate, or an entity representing voters may also seek permanent injunctive relief, with fee-shifting against a frivolous complaint. The codified section attributes the enactment to Act 2024-349, sections 1 to 3, which is the citation used here.
Privacy law14 instruments, 9 in force, 5 not yet in force
Research summary (408 words)
Alabama enacted a comprehensive consumer privacy statute in 2026, the Alabama Personal Data Protection Act (APDPA, HB 351), and Section 12 of the Act sets its effective date at .
The Act requires a controller's consent before processing sensitive data, including genetic or biometric data processed to uniquely identify a person, gives Alabama consumers rights to access, correct, delete, and port their data and opt out of targeted advertising, sale, and certain automated profiling, and lets the Attorney General enforce it with a mandatory 45-day cure period and no private right of action.
Separately, and already in force, the Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018 requires notice to the Attorney General of a breach of sensitive personally identifying information likely to cause substantial harm; that Act's codified text is not verified directly, because Justia serves a CAPTCHA challenge and FindLaw does not carry this chapter of the Alabama Code, so its penalty amount and private-right-of-action posture are left unstated rather than repeated from commentary alone.
Alabama's Genetic Data Privacy Act bars a genetic testing company from disclosing a consumer's genetic data to an insurer or an employer without the consumer's express written consent. Section 27-53-2 of the Code of Alabama bars a health benefit plan from using the results of a genetic test that may show a predisposition for cancer to determine insurability or to discriminate against the person in rates or benefits.
Alabama's Insurance Data Security Law requires an insurance licensee to notify the Commissioner of Insurance of a cybersecurity event within three business days of determining that it occurred when a statutory criterion is met. Alabama Insurance Department regulation 482-1-122 bars a licensee from disclosing a consumer's nonpublic personal financial information to a nonaffiliated third party unless the consumer has had a reasonable opportunity to opt out and has not done so.
Section 22-11A-22 of the Code of Alabama makes the medical records of persons infected with designated sexually transmitted diseases confidential and makes a violation a Class C misdemeanor. Chapter 35 of Title 8 of the Code of Alabama lets a consumer place a security freeze on the consumer's credit report by a written request sent by certified mail to a consumer credit reporting agency.
The Alabama Mental Health Consumers' Rights Act gives a consumer of mental health services in an inpatient, residential or outpatient setting the right to confidentiality of all information in the consumer's mental health, medical and financial records.
The Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018 binds every covered entity that acquires or uses sensitive personally identifying information, a term defined to include a government entity alongside a person, corporation or nonprofit. A covered entity that determines a breach of security has acquired sensitive personally identifying information, and is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to the Alabama residents concerned, must notify each affected individual within 45 days.
Where more than 1,000 individuals must be notified, the entity must also give the Attorney General written notice within 45 days. The entity must also notify the nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay when it discovers circumstances requiring notice of more than 1,000 individuals at a single time. The Attorney General has exclusive authority to bring an action for civil penalties under the Act, and a violation does not establish a private cause of action.
A covered entity that violates the notification provisions is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each consecutive day it fails to take reasonable action to comply. Civil penalties assessed for a knowing violation of the notice requirements do not exceed $500,000 per breach. Government entities are subject to the notice requirements of the Act but exempt from any civil penalty it authorizes.
Section 13 of the Act provides that it becomes effective on the first day of the third month following its passage and approval by the Governor. No official record stating the day the Governor approved the Act, or the resulting day, has been located.
A licensee is a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be, under Alabama insurance law, other than a purchasing group, a risk retention group chartered and licensed in another state, or a licensee acting as an assuming insurer domiciled in another state.
Each licensee must notify the Commissioner of Insurance as promptly as possible, and in no event later than three business days from a determination that a cybersecurity event involving nonpublic information in its possession has occurred, when either of two statutory criteria is met.
Under section 27-62-6(a)(1), the notice duty applies where Alabama is the insurer's state of domicile or the producer's home state and the event has a reasonable likelihood of materially harming an Alabama consumer or a material part of the licensee's normal operation.
Under section 27-62-6(a)(2), the notice duty also applies where the licensee reasonably believes the nonpublic information involves 250 or more Alabama consumers and the event must be reported to a government body or supervisory body under other law or is reasonably likely to materially harm an Alabama consumer or a material part of its operation.
A licensee giving notice under section 27-62-6 must give the Commissioner, in electronic form as the Commissioner directs, as much as possible of a list of items that includes the date of the event, how the information was exposed, and the number of affected Alabama consumers. A licensee must also comply with the Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018, as applicable, and give the Commissioner a copy of the notice sent to consumers under that law.
A licensee that becomes aware of an event in a system maintained by a third-party service provider must treat the event as its own unless the provider gives the Commissioner the notice. A licensee other than a producer that violates the Insurance Data Security Law may be subject to suspension or revocation of its license or certificate of authority or, in lieu of that, a fine of up to $10,000 per violation.
An insurance producer that violates the Insurance Data Security Law may be penalized in accordance with section 27-7-19. The Insurance Data Security Law may not be construed to create or imply a private cause of action for a violation, or to curtail a private cause of action that would otherwise exist.
The Insurance Data Security Law establishes the exclusive state standards applicable to licensees for data security, the investigation of a cybersecurity event, and notification to the Commissioner of Insurance of a cybersecurity event. The Commissioner of Insurance may examine and investigate the affairs of any licensee to determine whether the licensee has engaged in conduct that violates the Insurance Data Security Law.
A licensee must maintain records concerning all cybersecurity events for at least five years from the date of each event and must produce those records upon demand of the Commissioner of Insurance. Where a cybersecurity event has or may have occurred in a system maintained by a third-party service provider, the licensee must complete the investigation steps in subsection (b) or confirm and document that the provider has completed them.
A licensee is a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be, under Alabama insurance law, other than a purchasing group, a risk retention group chartered and licensed in another state, or a licensee acting as an assuming insurer domiciled in another state.
Not yet in force.from ,in 6 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
APDPA governs private-sector processing of Alabama consumers' personal data, with an effective date of . It applies to a person conducting business in Alabama, or targeting products or services to Alabama residents, who controls or processes personal data of more than 25,000 Alabama consumers, excluding payment-transaction-only data, or derives more than 25% of gross revenue from selling personal data.
Broad entity- and data-level exemptions apply, including government bodies, higher-education institutions, Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)- and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-regulated entities, small nonprofits and businesses under the applicability threshold, political committees, and employment or business-to-business data. 'Personal data' excludes deidentified data and publicly available information.
Not yet in force.from ,in 6 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
APDPA requires the contract between a controller and a processor to require the processor to make available to the controller, on the controller's reasonable request, all information in the processor's possession necessary to demonstrate the processor's compliance with the obligations of the Act.
A controller that processes personal data under an exemption in section 10 bears the burden of demonstrating that the processing qualifies for the exemption and complies with the requirements of that section.
Not yet in force.from ,in 6 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
APDPA gives an Alabama consumer the right to confirm and access their personal data, correct inaccuracies, delete data, obtain a portable copy, and opt out of targeted advertising, the sale of personal data, and profiling in furtherance of a solely automated decision with a legal or similarly significant effect.
A controller must respond within 45 days of receipt, with one 45-day extension available when reasonably necessary, free of charge once per 12-month period; a controller may charge a reasonable fee or decline a manifestly unfounded, excessive, technically infeasible, or repetitive request, with the burden on the controller to show that. The Act provides no separate appeal-of-refusal mechanism.
A parent or guardian may exercise a known child's rights, and a guardian or conservator may exercise an incapacitated consumer's rights.
Ala. Code secs. 8-35-1 to 8-35-3official Code of Alabama text, Alabama Legislative Information System (ALISON), with the enrolled bill for Act 2012-500
In force since .Binds private bodies.
What this law does
The chapter protects a consumer, defined as a natural person residing in Alabama. A consumer may place a security freeze on the consumer's credit report by making a request in writing by certified mail to a consumer credit reporting agency. The agency must place the freeze no later than three business days after receiving the written request.
The agency must send the consumer written confirmation of the freeze, with a unique personal identification number or password other than the consumer's Social Security number, within 10 business days of placing it. While a freeze is in place, the agency may not release the consumer's credit report or credit score without the consumer's prior express authorization, subject to the exceptions the section lists.
The agency must lift a freeze temporarily within three business days of a written request and within 15 minutes of a qualifying telephone or electronic request received during normal business hours. The agency must remove a freeze within three business days of receiving the consumer's request for removal.
The agency may charge a fee of no more than $10 for each placement, permanent removal or temporary lifting of a freeze, and may not charge a person age 65 or over for placement or an identity theft victim who has submitted a qualifying law enforcement report. A person that violates the section may be fined not more than $100 for a violation concerning a specific consumer.
Whenever a consumer must receive the summary of rights that the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act requires, the consumer must also be given the statutory notice of the right to obtain a security freeze. The enrolled bill made the act effective on the first day of the third month following its passage and approval by the Governor.
Chapter 482-1-122 governs the treatment of nonpublic personal financial information about individuals by all licensees of the Alabama Department of Insurance. Chapter 482-1-122 applies to information about individuals who obtain or seek to obtain products or services primarily for personal, family or household purposes from licensees, and not to information about companies or about individuals who obtain products or services for business, commercial or agricultural purposes.
Chapter 482-1-122 applies to all insurers, producers, agents, brokers, service representatives, and other persons licensed or required to be licensed under the Alabama Insurance Code, other than under Chapter 32 of Title 8 (Service Contracts). A licensee must give a customer a clear and conspicuous notice that accurately reflects its privacy policies and practices not later than when it establishes the customer relationship.
A licensee must give a consumer such a notice before it discloses any nonpublic personal financial information about the consumer to a nonaffiliated third party, other than as authorized by sections 15 and 16 of Chapter 482-1-122. A licensee must give customers a clear and conspicuous notice of its privacy policies and practices at least once in any period of twelve consecutive months during which the customer relationship exists.
Each initial, annual and revised notice under Chapter 482-1-122 must state the categories of nonpublic personal financial information the licensee collects and the categories it discloses. A licensee may not, directly or through any affiliate, disclose nonpublic personal financial information about a consumer to a nonaffiliated third party unless it has given the initial notice and the opt out notice, has given the consumer a reasonable opportunity to opt out, and the consumer does not opt out.
A licensee may not disclose a policy number or similar access number or code for a consumer's policy or transaction account to a nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing through electronic mail, other than to a consumer reporting agency.
The opt out requirements of Chapter 482-1-122 do not apply when a licensee gives nonpublic personal financial information to a nonaffiliated third party to perform services for the licensee, if the licensee gives the initial notice and has a contract that prohibits the third party from disclosing or using the information other than to carry out the purposes of the disclosure.
A licensee may not unfairly discriminate against a consumer or customer because that person has opted out of the disclosure of his or her nonpublic personal financial information. A licensee that violates Chapter 482-1-122 may be subject to suspension or revocation of its license or certificate of authority. Chapter 482-1-122 is effective , and the time for compliance was extended until .
Until , a contract that a licensee entered into on or before with a nonaffiliated third party to perform services for the licensee satisfied section 14A(1)(b) of Chapter 482-1-122 even if the contract did not require the third party to maintain the confidentiality of nonpublic personal information.
Not yet in force.from ,in 6 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
The Alabama Attorney General may enforce violations of APDPA. Before any enforcement action, the Attorney General must issue a written notice of violation to the controller; if the controller corrects the violation within 45 days and provides a written statement confirming the cure and that no further violations will occur, no action may be initiated. An uncured violation is subject to a court-assessed civil penalty of not more than $15,000 per violation. The Act creates no private right of action.
A genetic testing company is any person, other than a health care provider, who directly solicits a biological sample from a consumer for analysis in order to provide products or services to the consumer. A consumer is any individual who is an Alabama resident. A genetic testing company must prominently display to a consumer, in plain language, complete information about its policies and procedures for the collection, use, maintenance and disclosure of genetic data.
A genetic testing company must obtain the consumer's initial express consent to use of the biological sample and resulting genetic data to provide the product or service the consumer ordered. A genetic testing company must obtain the consumer's express consent every time it transfers the sample or discloses the genetic data to a third party other than a contractor for a reason other than fulfilling an order, uses them for another purpose, or markets to the consumer based on the genetic data.
A genetic testing company must provide a process for the consumer to access the genetic data, delete the account, request destruction of the biological sample and genetic data, and revoke any consent given. A genetic testing company must comply with a destruction request as soon as reasonably possible and no more than 30 days after the request is made.
A genetic testing company may not disclose a consumer's genetic data to a health, life, disability or long-term care insurer, or to an employer or prospective employer of the consumer, without the consumer's express written consent.
Chapter 43 of Title 8 of the Code of Alabama does not apply to a covered entity or business associate as defined in the federal health privacy regulations, to noncommercial research and instruction by an institution of higher learning, or to samples and data lawfully obtained by law enforcement in a criminal investigation.
The Consumer Interest Division of the Office of the Attorney General may sue in circuit court to enjoin a violation or to recover a civil penalty of up to $3,000 for each violation. The Alabama Genetic Data Privacy Act took effect on .
A provider under the Alabama Mental Health Consumers' Rights Act is any agency, corporation, or individual who provides inpatient, residential or outpatient mental health services to a consumer or consumers, and the Act applies to a physician only to the extent that medical services must be provided in accordance with established standards of medical care. A consumer under the Alabama Mental Health Consumers' Rights Act is a person who receives or uses mental health services.
Section 22-56-4(b)(6) gives a consumer of mental health services in an inpatient, residential or outpatient setting the right to confidentiality of all information in the consumer's mental health, medical and financial records.
Section 22-56-4(b)(7) gives a consumer of mental health services in an inpatient, residential or outpatient setting the right to access on request all information in the consumer's mental health, medical and financial records, unless a clinical determination has been made by professional staff that access would be detrimental to the consumer's health.
Section 22-56-4(b)(14) gives a consumer of mental health services in an inpatient, residential or outpatient setting the right to enforce rights in a court of competent jurisdiction or appropriate administrative proceeding. The Alabama Department of Mental Health must establish teams to monitor compliance with its certification standards by state facilities, community mental health centers, and providers under contract to the department.
The Alabama Mental Health Consumers' Rights Act does not reduce or expand the rights of mental health consumers in Alabama beyond the rights guaranteed to any other person under federal and Alabama law. No day on which the Act came into force has been located.
Not yet in force.from ,in 6 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
APDPA requires a controller to obtain an Alabama consumer's consent before processing sensitive data, defined to include racial or ethnic origin, religious belief, a mental or physical health diagnosis, sex life or sexual orientation, citizenship or immigration status, precise geolocation, a known child's personal data, and the processing of genetic or biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying an individual.
'Biometric data' means data generated by automatic measurements of biological characteristics, such as a fingerprint, voiceprint, retina, or iris, used to identify a specific individual, and the definition expressly excludes a digital or physical photograph and an audio or video recording, but claws that exclusion back for any data generated from a photograph or recording once that data is used to identify a specific individual.
Section 22-11A-22 makes all information, reports and medical records concerning persons infected with sexually transmitted diseases designated by the State Board of Health confidential, and not subject to public inspection or admission into evidence in any court except commitment proceedings brought under the article. Under section 22-11A-22, an individual's medical record may be released on the written consent of the patient.
Anyone violating section 22-11A-22 is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor. Section 22-11A-38(a) authorizes the State Committee of Public Health to establish the rules by which exceptions may be made to the confidentiality provisions of its article.
Section 22-11A-38(g) requires all persons who receive a notification of the contagious condition of an individual under that section to hold the information in the strictest confidence and privilege and to take only the actions necessary to protect health where there is a foreseeable, real or probable risk of transmission. Except as provided in section 22-11A-38, any information required under its article remains confidential.
Any person violating a provision of section 22-11A-38 or its approved guidelines is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor. No day on which the sections came into force has been located.
A health benefit plan is a health insurance policy, including a self-insured health plan, that covers hospital, medical or surgical expenses. A health benefit plan located or domiciled outside Alabama is subject to the chapter if it receives, processes, adjudicates, pays or denies claims for Alabama residents or for care received in Alabama.
A genetic test is a pre-symptomatic laboratory test, generally accepted in the scientific and medical communities, for determining the presence or absence of genetic characteristics that cause or are associated with risk of a disease or disorder. A health benefit plan may not require, as a condition of insurability, that a person take a genetic test to determine whether the person has a predisposition for cancer.
A health benefit plan may not use the results of a genetic test that may show a predisposition for cancer to determine insurability or to discriminate against the person in rates or benefits. Chapter 53 of Title 27 of the Code of Alabama applies to all programs administered by the Alabama Medicaid Agency.
The license of an insurance company or health maintenance organization is subject to suspension, revocation or another administrative penalty, within the discretion of the Commissioner of Insurance, for any violation of Chapter 53 of Title 27 of the Code of Alabama. No day on which the chapter came into force has been located.
Alabama diverges from the federal baseline with its own computer-misuse statute: the Alabama Digital Crime Act (2012), which replaced the older 1985 Alabama Computer Crime Act, makes it a crime to act without authority or to exceed authorization of use and, in doing so, knowingly commit one of eight listed acts such as altering or destroying data, taking or disclosing data, introducing a virus, disrupting service, or obtaining confidential government records.
The Act separately defines exceeding authorization of use as accessing a computer with actual or perceived authorization and then using that access to obtain or alter information the accessor is not entitled to obtain or alter, a definition close to the federal gates-based test. No Alabama court decision applying this statute to open-web scraping specifically was located, so whether ordinary, non-disruptive automated collection of a public page fits the statute's elements is untested.
Copyright, text-and-data-mining, and database rights remain federal only; Alabama adds nothing there. robots.txt carries no independent legal weight under Alabama law that was located. A separate provision of the same 2012 Act, encoded data fraud (card-skimming devices), was checked and does not reach web scraping or data collection.
A person who acts without authority or who exceeds authorization of use commits computer tampering by knowingly doing one of eight things: accessing and altering, damaging, or destroying a computer, program, or network; altering, damaging, deleting, or destroying data; disclosing, using, controlling, or taking programs, data, or documentation; introducing a virus; disrupting or denying computer or network services; preventing a user from exiting a site or connection; obtaining confidential information or non-public records from a government or medical computer system; or giving out a password or other security credential without consent.
Exceeds authorization of use is separately defined as accessing a computer with actual or perceived authorization and then using that access to obtain or alter information the accessor is not entitled to obtain or alter.
The base offense is a Class A misdemeanor; it rises to a Class C felony where the actor intends an unlawful act, benefit, defraud, or harm; to a Class B felony where a victim's expenditure exceeds $2,500 or the intended interruption reaches a government or utility service, and separately where the violation touches Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center or Alabama Justice Information Commission data; and to a Class A felony where a victim's expenditure exceeds $100,000 or the violation causes physical injury to an uninvolved person.
This statute replaced the prior Alabama Computer Crime Act (1985), whose intellectual-property offense provision was repealed by the same 2012 Act.
Alabama's product-security and cyber-resilience posture, for a private-sector operator, rests on one enacted state statute reaching a covered entity's general security posture: the Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018 (Act 2018-396, effective ), whose Section 8-38-3 requires each covered entity and third-party agent to implement and maintain reasonable security measures to protect sensitive personally identifying information against a breach of security, and whose Section 8-38-10 separately requires a covered entity or third-party agent to take reasonable measures to dispose of records containing that information, by shredding, erasing, or otherwise rendering it unreadable, once the records are no longer to be retained.
"Covered entity" is defined broadly to include a government entity as well as a private business, so both duties bind the state and its political subdivisions alongside private operators.
Enforcement of these two duties is narrower than the chapter's heading suggests: Section 8-38-9, titled "Violations of Notification Requirements," gives the Attorney General exclusive authority to bring a civil action under the chapter, but the only civil-penalty amounts the section actually states, up to $500,000 per breach under Section 8-19-11, or $5,000 per day under subsection (b)(1), are tied expressly to a violation of "the notification provisions of this chapter" and "the notice provisions of this chapter," the separate duties at Sections 8-38-4 through 8-38-8, not to the reasonable-security or disposal duties recorded here; no other enforcement mechanism or penalty figure is stated in the chapter for a violation of Section 8-38-3 or Section 8-38-10 specifically.
The chapter forecloses a private cause of action for a violation of any of its provisions, while preserving whatever right a person may separately have at common law, by statute, or otherwise. No enacted Alabama statute was located that sets security requirements a connected device or software product must meet before or after it reaches the market, comparable to California's or Oregon's connected-device statutes or the Cyber Resilience Act; this is a researched absence.
Alabama has adopted the NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law as its own Insurance Data Security Law, Ala. Code sections 27-62-1 to 27-62-11 (Act 2019-98), which requires each "licensee," defined at Section 27-62-3 as a person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered pursuant to the insurance laws of the state, to develop, implement, and maintain a written information security program and to investigate and notify the Commissioner of a cybersecurity event.
Its information security program duty is filed as a row of its own.
Alabama has no general private-sector duty to report an exploited vulnerability or a security incident to an authority: the Insurance Data Security Law's own incident-notification duty, Section 27-62-6, reaches only that same licensee population and is this jurisdiction's privacy-topic row, and the state's Office of Information Technology operates a cyber-incident-reporting channel that is a state-agency program rather than a status-based duty on a private operator.
Alabama's breach-notification duty, the Data Breach Notification Act's Sections 8-38-4 through 8-38-8, is already this jurisdiction's privacy row rather than repeated here.
The Alabama Personal Data Protection Act (HB 351, 2026), Ala. Code Title 8, Chapter 44, effective , layers a comprehensive privacy regime's own security-of-processing clause onto any controller it reaches, Section 7(a)(2), requiring a controller to establish, implement, and maintain reasonable administrative, technical, and physical data security practices appropriate to the volume and nature of the personal data at issue; this belongs to the privacy topic rather than here, on the same reasoning Texas's Data Privacy and Security Act's Section 541.101(a)(2) does, because it is one subsection of a comprehensive regime addressed to a controller and the chapter's other controller duties are already researched there.
Section 27-62-4 of the Insurance Data Security Law requires each insurance licensee to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program.
Section 27-62-4 requires each licensee to develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive written information security program based on its risk assessment that contains administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for the protection of nonpublic information and its information system.
A licensee is any person licensed, authorized to operate, or registered, or required to be, under the insurance laws of Alabama, other than a purchasing group, a risk retention group chartered and licensed in another state, or an assuming insurer domiciled in another state. A licensee must establish a written incident response plan designed to promptly respond to, and recover from, any cybersecurity event that compromises the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of nonpublic information.
A licensee must exercise due diligence in selecting a third-party service provider and require the provider to implement appropriate administrative, technical, and physical measures to protect the information systems and nonpublic information that the provider holds. Each insurer domiciled in Alabama must submit to the commissioner, annually on or before February 15, a written statement certifying that it complies with the chapter.
A licensee is exempt from section 27-62-4 if it has fewer than 25 employees, less than $5 million in gross annual revenue, or less than $10 million in year-end total assets. A licensee other than an insurance producer that violates the chapter may be subject to suspension or revocation of its license or certificate of authority or, in lieu of that, a fine of up to $10,000 per violation.
Licensees had until to implement section 27-62-4 other than subsection (f), and until to implement subsection (f). The chapter does not create or imply a private cause of action for a violation of its provisions.
Ala. Code secs. 8-38-3, 8-38-10Official statute text, Code of Alabama, Title 8, Chapter 38 (Data Breach Notification Act of 2018)
In force since .Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Each covered entity and third-party agent must implement and maintain reasonable security measures to protect sensitive personally identifying information against a breach of security, including designating an employee to coordinate the measures, identifying internal and external risks, adopting and assessing safeguards, requiring service providers to maintain appropriate safeguards by contract, adjusting the measures for changed circumstances, and keeping management informed of their overall status.
A covered entity or third-party agent must separately take reasonable measures to dispose, or arrange for the disposal, of records containing sensitive personally identifying information within its custody or control once the records are no longer to be retained, by shredding, erasing, or otherwise modifying the information to make it unreadable or undecipherable through any reasonable means consistent with industry standards.
"Covered entity" is defined to include a government entity as well as a private business. There is no private right of action for a violation of either duty, and the chapter's stated civil-penalty amounts apply only to a violation of the chapter's separate notification provisions, not to these two duties.
Age gating law2 instruments, 1 in force, 1 not yet in force
Research summary (89 words)
Alabama requires commercial adult websites to verify that visitors are 18 or older under a 2024 law that remains in effect. In 2026 Alabama enacted an App Store Accountability Act requiring app store providers to verify user age and obtain parental consent before minors can download apps or make purchases, effective .
Alabama has not enacted a general social media minor access law or a children's data protection design code; a 2025 bill to require social media age verification for minors did not advance out of committee.
Requires commercial entities whose websites are more than one-third sexual material harmful to minors to use a reasonable age verification method to ensure visitors are 18 or older, without retaining identifying information after access is granted.
Not yet in force.from ,in 2 months It starts to bind on .
Binds private bodies.
What this law does
Requires app store providers to request and verify a user's age category (under 13, 13-15, 16-17, or 18 and older) at account creation, and to obtain verifiable parental consent before a minor may download an app or make purchases. Accounts in existence on must be categorized and verified before . The House passed the bill on , the Senate amended and passed it on , and the House concurred in the Senate amendment on .
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
Reuse law
Alabama has no press-publisher neighbouring right, mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, or codified hot-news misappropriation statute distinct from federal law. The Code of Alabama has no title addressing copyright as such, which is occupied by federal law; Title 13A's theft and property offenses (Ala. Code Title 13A, Chapter 8) reach computer tampering and card-skimming fraud but no provision addressing reproduction of news headlines, snippets, or a text-and-data-mining opt-out.
No Alabama legislative bill proposing a journalism usage fee or a platform-to-publisher payment scheme, and no Alabama court decision addressing snippet reproduction, linking, framing, or hot-news misappropriation specifically, was located. Copyright over news content reproduced or aggregated by services operating in Alabama is governed by the federal Copyright Act and its fair-use doctrine, already addressed in the federal document for this topic.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Alabama AI law
No current case law for Alabama privacy law
No current case law for Alabama scraping law
No current case law for Alabama cybersecurity law
No current case law for Alabama communications law
No current case law for Alabama content moderation law
No current case law for Alabama product and AI liability law
No current case law for Alabama digital accessibility law
No current case law for Alabama age gating law
No current case law for Alabama reuse law
Reporting clocks that run here18 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Alabama comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
As an insurance licensee, notify the Commissioner of Insurance as promptly as possible, and no later than three business days after you determine that a cybersecurity event involving nonpublic information in your possession has occurred, where Alabama is your state of domicile (an insurer) or home state (a producer) and the event has a reasonable likelihood of materially harming an Alabama consumer or any material part of your normal operation.
As an assuming insurer, notify your affected ceding insurers and the Commissioner of your state of domicile within three business days of determining that an event occurred or of receiving notice from your third-party service provider; ceding insurers with a direct contractual relationship with affected consumers give the consumer notices under the Alabama Data Breach Notification Act of 2018.
Notify each affected Alabama resident within 45 days after receiving notice of a breach from a third-party agent or after determining that a breach of security has acquired sensitive personally identifying information and is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm.
Give the Alabama Attorney General written notice within 45 days when more than 1,000 individuals must be notified of a breach.
As a third-party agent that has experienced a breach of security in a system it maintains, notify the covered entity as expeditiously as possible and without unreasonable delay, and no later than 10 days after determining the breach occurred or having reason to believe it occurred.
Notify the nationwide consumer reporting agencies without unreasonable delay when more than 1,000 individuals must be notified at a single time.
The law of the United States, which applies in Alabama
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center via the Emergency Notification System within one hour after discovery of a cyberattack that adversely impacted safety-related or important-to-safety functions, security functions, or emergency preparedness functions (including offsite communications), or that compromised support systems and equipment resulting in adverse impacts to those functions.
Also notify within one hour after discovery of a cyberattack that adversely impacted the safety, security, and emergency preparedness functions performed by digital assets described in 10 CFR 73.77(a)(1)(ii).
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center within four hours after discovery of a cyberattack that could have caused such an adverse impact, after discovery of a suspected or actual cyberattack initiated by personnel with physical or electronic access to the systems in scope, or after notifying a local, State, or other Federal agency of an event related to your cyber security program that does not otherwise require notification.
Notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center within eight hours after receipt or collection of information regarding observed behavior, activities, or statements that may indicate intelligence gathering or pre-operational planning related to a cyberattack against the systems in scope.
Use the site corrective action program to record vulnerabilities, weaknesses, failures and deficiencies in your cyber security program, and the notifications you make, within twenty-four hours of their discovery.
Once the final rule takes effect, report a covered cyber incident to the Agency not later than 72 hours after your organization reasonably believes that the covered cyber incident has occurred.
Once the final rule takes effect, report a ransom payment to the Agency not later than 24 hours after your organization makes the payment, even where the underlying ransomware attack is not itself a covered cyber incident.
Once the final rule takes effect, promptly submit an update to a previously submitted covered cyber incident report whenever substantial new or different information becomes available or a ransom payment is later made, continuing until your organization notifies the Agency that the incident has concluded and been fully mitigated and resolved, and preserve data relevant to the incident or payment under the procedures the final rule establishes.
Upon any responsible SCI personnel having a reasonable basis to conclude that an SCI event has occurred, begin appropriate corrective action and notify the Commission of the SCI event immediately.
Within 24 hours of that conclusion, submit a written notification to the Commission, made on a good faith, best efforts basis, that describes the SCI event and the systems affected and, to the extent available, your assessment of the market participants potentially affected, the potential impact on the market, and the steps you have taken, are taking or plan to take.
If the SCI event is resolved and the investigation closed within 30 calendar days, submit a final written notification within five business days after resolution. If not, submit an interim written notification within 30 calendar days after the event, and a final one within five business days after resolution and closure.
If your organization is a banking organization, notify your primary federal banking regulator, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, or the FDIC, whichever supervises it, about a notification incident, as soon as possible and no later than 36 hours after your organization determines that a notification incident has occurred.
A notification incident is the subset of computer-security incidents that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, your ability to serve customers, a business line, or an operation whose failure would threaten the financial stability of the United States, so a computer-security incident that falls short of that threshold does not by itself start this clock.
If your organization is a bank service provider, notify at least one bank-designated point of contact at each affected banking organization customer as soon as possible after your organization determines that it has experienced a computer-security incident that has materially disrupted or degraded, or is reasonably likely to materially disrupt or degrade, covered services provided to that banking organization for a period of four hours or more.
This duty carries a standard, as soon as possible, rather than a fixed number of hours to notify by, and that disruption threshold is what engages the duty rather than a period to notify within.
If you are a developer or provider of a frontier AI model, or an operator of critical infrastructure that uses an AI model to manage industrial control systems or other operational technologies, report any confirmed AI safety incident or AI security incident within 30 days of confirmation, and within 72 hours if the incident poses an imminent threat to national security, critical infrastructure or public safety.
If your organization is a federally insured credit union, notify the NCUA-designated point of contact of a reportable cyber incident by email, telephone, or another method the NCUA prescribes, so that the NCUA receives the notification as soon as possible and no later than 72 hours after your organization reasonably believes it has experienced a reportable cyber incident.
Where the reportable cyber incident is a disruption of business operations or unauthorized access to sensitive data facilitated through, or caused by, a compromise of a credit union service organization, cloud service provider, or other third-party data hosting provider, or by a supply chain compromise, the NCUA must receive the notification within 72 hours of your organization being notified by the third party if that is sooner.
Send the notice as soon as practicable, but not later than 30 days, after becoming aware that unauthorized access to or use of customer information has occurred or is reasonably likely to have occurred, delaying it only for the period the United States Attorney General specifies where the Attorney General determines that notice poses a substantial risk to national security or public safety (17 CFR 248.30(a)(4)(iii)).
Maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to require oversight, including through due diligence and monitoring, of service providers, including that a service provider notify you as soon as possible, and no later than 72 hours, after becoming aware of a breach in security resulting in unauthorized access to a customer information system it maintains (17 CFR 248.30(a)(5)(i)).
Rapidly report a cyber incident to the Department of Defense within 72 hours of discovering it, at the Department's DIBNet portal (dibnet.dod.mil), using a DoD-approved medium assurance certificate that you must obtain before you need to file a report.
Make those policies and procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each service provider takes appropriate measures to protect against unauthorized access to or use of customer information, and to notify you as soon as possible, but no later than 72 hours after becoming aware that a breach in security has occurred resulting in unauthorized access to a customer information system the service provider maintains.
If your organization is an Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting company, determine, without unreasonable delay after you discover a cybersecurity incident, whether the incident is material, and if it is, file a Form 8-K under Item 1.05 within four business days after you make that determination.
If the information called for in Item 1.05 is not determined or is unavailable when you file, state that in the filing and file an amendment to the Form 8-K within four business days after you determine it or it becomes available.
After you reasonably determine that a breach of your customers' CPNI has occurred, electronically notify the United States Secret Service and the Federal Bureau of Investigation through the central reporting facility as soon as practicable, and in no event later than seven business days (47 CFR 64.2011(b)).
Do not notify customers or disclose the breach where the relevant investigating agency directs you in writing not to, for an initial period of up to 30 days that the agency may extend (47 CFR 64.2011(b)(3)).
If you are a vendor of personal health records (an entity that offers or maintains an electronic record of health information that can draw information from multiple sources and is managed, shared and controlled by or primarily for the individual) or a PHR related entity, notify each affected individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, in plain language and without unreasonable delay, no later than 60 calendar days after you discover a breach of security of unsecured PHR identifiable health information.
Notify prominent media outlets serving a State or jurisdiction, without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after you discover the breach, when the unsecured PHR identifiable health information of 500 or more of its residents is, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired during the breach.
If you are a third party service provider, notify the official designated in a written contract by the vendor of personal health records or PHR related entity you serve (or else a senior official of that vendor or entity), without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after you discover the breach; identify each customer of that vendor or entity whose unsecured PHR identifiable health information has been, or is reasonably believed to have been, acquired during the breach; and obtain acknowledgment that the notice was received.
Notify affected individuals without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovering a breach of unsecured protected health information.
For a breach of unsecured protected health information involving more than 500 residents of a State or jurisdiction, notify prominent media outlets serving that State or jurisdiction without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.
If you are a business associate, notify the covered entity of a breach of unsecured protected health information without unreasonable delay and in no case later than 60 calendar days after discovery of the breach.
If your organization is a derivatives clearing organization, notify staff of the Division of Clearing and Risk promptly of any hardware or software malfunction, security incident, or targeted threat that materially impairs, or creates a significant likelihood of material impairment of, automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, and of any activation of your business continuity and disaster recovery plan.
If your organization is a designated contract market, notify Commission staff promptly of all cyber security incidents or targeted threats that actually or potentially jeopardize automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, as well as electronic trading halts and significant systems malfunctions and activations of your business continuity-disaster recovery plan.
If your organization is a swap execution facility, notify Commission staff promptly of all cyber security incidents or targeted threats that actually or potentially jeopardize automated system operation, reliability, security, or capacity, as well as electronic trading halts and material system malfunctions and activations of your business continuity-disaster recovery plan.
Evidence of sabotage, subversive activity, or an actual or threatened cyber incident involving or endangering any vessel, harbor, port, or waterfront facility must be reported immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (for any cyber incident), and the Captain of the Port, or to their respective representatives.
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.