Rwanda's comprehensive data-protection regime is Law N° 58/2021 of relating to the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy, assented to on and in force since , enforced by a supervisory authority defined as the public authority in charge of cyber security, the National Cyber Security Authority.
The Law binds any data controller, data processor, or third party established or residing in Rwanda who processes personal data, and any such person outside Rwanda who processes the personal data of a data subject located in Rwanda.
It classes race, health status, criminal records, genetic or biometric information, religious or philosophical beliefs, political opinion, and sexual life among sensitive personal data, sets a registration and data-protection-officer regime, requires a supervisory-authority authorisation, the data subject's consent, or another listed ground before personal data is shared or transferred outside Rwanda, and otherwise requires personal data to be stored in Rwanda unless the controller or processor holds a registration certificate authorising storage abroad.
It sets tiered administrative fines and, separately, tiered criminal penalties by offence.
Article 43 requires the data controller, within forty-eight hours of becoming aware of a personal data breach, to notify it to the supervisory authority, and requires a data processor who becomes aware of a breach to notify the data controller within the same forty-eight hours.
Article 44 requires the data controller to submit a full report to the supervisory authority no later than seventy-two hours after becoming aware of the breach, describing its nature, the affected categories and approximate numbers of data subjects and records, the data protection officer's or other contact point's details, the measures taken or proposed to address it and mitigate its effects, and a proposal and timeline for communicating it to affected data subjects.
Article 45 requires the data controller to communicate a breach likely to result in a high risk to a data subject's rights and freedoms to that data subject, in writing or electronically, after becoming aware of it, but sets no separate deadline for that communication, and excuses it where the data was already protected by measures such as encryption, the high risk is no longer likely to materialize, or an equally effective public communication was made instead; the supervisory authority may still require the communication to be made.
Article 2 applies the Law to processing personal data by electronic or other means, including through a non-automated platform, by a data controller, data processor or third party established or residing in Rwanda, and to any such person outside Rwanda who processes the personal data of a data subject located in Rwanda.
Article 4 requires a written contract between a data controller and a data processor before the processor may process personal data on the controller's behalf, and article 46 lists eight grounds, led by consent, on which processing personal data is lawful.
Article 6 requires the data subject's consent to be demonstrated where consent is the ground for processing, requires that consent to follow the data subject's free and informed decision, and permits it in oral, written or electronic form, and article 8 lets the data subject withdraw consent at any time without affecting the lawfulness of processing carried out before the withdrawal.
Article 13 relieves a controller or processor of any duty to acquire identifying information solely to comply with this Law where its processing purpose does not require identification, and articles 14 and 15 require personal data collected from someone other than the data subject to meet one of four listed grounds and require all personal data to be kept complete, accurate, current and not misleading.
Articles 16 and 17 require the data controller or processor to log data collection, alteration, access, disclosure, combination and erasure, and to maintain a record of all processing activities, both producible to the supervisory authority on request.
Articles 29 to 36 require registration as a data controller or data processor with the supervisory authority before processing personal data, govern the registration certificate's issuance, renewal, modification and cancellation, and require the supervisory authority to keep a public register.
Article 37 carries the lawfulness, purpose limitation, accuracy and storage limitation principles, article 38 requires appropriate technical and organisational measures, a record of processing, and a data protection impact assessment before high-risk processing such as large-scale processing of sensitive personal data or systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible area, and article 39 requires a data controller or processor with no establishment or residence in Rwanda to designate a representative there.
Article 40 requires designation of a data protection officer where the controller or processor is a public or private corporate body, carries out large-scale systematic monitoring, or processes sensitive personal data or criminal-conviction data on a large scale, and article 41 sets the officer's duties. Article 47 requires appropriate technical measures against loss, damage or destruction of personal data, regularly verified and kept updated against new risks.
Article 52 limits retention of personal data to the purpose for which it was collected unless a listed ground, such as a legal obligation, a court order or the data subject's consent, extends it, and requires destruction in a manner that prevents reconstruction once the retention period ends.
Article 48 permits a data controller or data processor to share or transfer personal data to a third party outside Rwanda only on a listed ground: the supervisory authority's authorisation with proof of appropriate safeguards, the data subject's consent, contractual necessity, public interest, the establishment or defence of a legal claim, protecting a vital interest, the controller's or processor's own compelling legitimate interests where the transfer is not repetitive and safeguards have been assessed, or performance of an international instrument Rwanda has ratified.
Article 49 requires a written contract with anyone authorised to access, share or transfer personal data outside Rwanda, and lets the supervisory authority demand proof of compliance or prohibit or suspend a transfer to protect data subjects' rights. Article 50 requires personal data to be stored in Rwanda, permitting storage abroad only where the controller or processor holds a valid registration certificate from the supervisory authority authorising it.
Article 21 gives the data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated personal data processing, including profiling, that may produce legal or other significant consequences for them. That right does not apply where the decision rests on the data subject's explicit consent, is necessary to enter into or perform a contract, or is authorised by a law that also puts in place suitable measures to safeguard the data subject's rights, freedoms and legitimate interests.
Automated processing intended to evaluate personal aspects of a natural person must not rest on sensitive personal data unless a ground listed in Article 10 applies.
Articles 18 to 26 give the data subject rights of access, objection, portability, rectification, erasure, and restriction of processing. Article 22 lets the data subject or the supervisory authority restrict processing while accuracy, lawfulness, or an objection is being resolved, article 25 excludes personal data from succession except by will, and article 26 lets a minor, a person with a physical or mental impairment, or anyone else designate a representative to exercise these rights.
A data subject dissatisfied with a controller's or processor's response to an objection, portability, erasure, or rectification request may appeal to the supervisory authority within thirty days, which must answer the appeal within sixty days.
Article 42 requires the data controller, when collecting personal data, to give the data subject an information notice covering identity and contact details, the purposes and recipients of processing, whether provision of the data is mandatory, the existence and consequences of automated decision making, the retention period, and the rights this Law gives the data subject, including the right to withdraw consent and to appeal to the supervisory authority.
Article 27 tasks the supervisory authority with overseeing the Law's implementation, responding to requests for an opinion, informing data subjects, controllers, processors and third parties of their rights and obligations, keeping the register of data controllers and processors, investigating and deciding complaints, and cooperating with domestic and foreign counterparts, and article 28 gives it the power to issue registration certificates, ensure compliance, protect public freedoms and privacy from information and communication technologies, make regulations, and impose administrative sanctions.
Article 53 sets an administrative fine, for an individual, of between two million and five million Rwandan francs or one percent of the preceding financial year's global turnover for listed misconducts including failure to maintain records, log processing, register, report a certificate change, designate a data protection officer, or notify, report or communicate a breach, and one percent of global turnover alone for a corporate body or legal entity, with article 54 letting anyone dissatisfied with an administrative sanction apply to the competent court and article 55 depositing the fine with the Public Treasury.
Articles 56 to 61 create separate criminal offences, each with its own imprisonment and fine range, for unlawfully accessing, using, sharing, transferring or disclosing personal data, re-identifying de-identified data, destroying, erasing, concealing or altering data, selling data, unlawfully collecting or processing sensitive personal data, and providing false registration information, article 62 fines a corporate body or legal entity convicted of any of those offences five percent of its preceding financial year's annual turnover, and article 63 lets the court order seizure or confiscation of items and proceeds and the permanent or temporary closure of the offending entity or premises.
Article 64 makes the supervisory authority the organ that settles conflicts arising under this Law in the first instance, subject to a party's right to take an unresolved conflict to a competent court, and article 65 gives a person who suffers serious damage from a controller's or processor's violation of this Law the right to claim compensation before a competent court, unless the controller or processor proves it was not responsible for the damage.
Article 9 requires the consent of a holder of parental responsibility before processing personal data belonging to a child under sixteen, permits that consent only where given in the child's interest, and dispenses with it where processing is necessary to protect the child's vital interest.
Article 10 permits processing sensitive personal data, defined at article 3 to include race, health status, criminal records, medical records, social origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, political opinion, genetic or biometric information, sexual life and family details, only on the data subject's consent, the controller's or processor's legal obligations, a vital interest, public health, or archiving, scientific, historical or statistical purposes.
Article 11 layers safeguards onto that processing: compliance with the sensitive-data retention periods this Law sets, staff-capacity building, controls on who may access it, and technical and organisational measures appropriate to the risk, including storing it separately from other data and applying tokenisation, pseudonymisation or encryption.
Article 12 places processing personal data of a convict, whose criminal record is itself a category of sensitive personal data, under the supervisory authority's supervision, and requires safeguards for that data subject's rights and freedoms.
Rwanda has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.
The Law on Prevention and Punishment of Cybercrimes, 2018 criminalises unauthorised access to computer or computer system data, and unlike a security-measure-triggered offence, its own three grounds turn on lacking consent, lacking entitlement to control or access, or accessing another person's computer system without authorisation, none of which require defeating a technical access control, so whether reading a public, unauthenticated page falls inside or outside the provision has not been tested in a reported Rwandan case.
No Rwandan court has ruled on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms of service against a scraper.
The Law on the Protection of Intellectual Property, 2024 permits the use, in the form of quotation, of a short part of a published work, compatible with fair practice and not exceeding the extent justified by the purpose, and separately excludes news of the day and mere items of press information from copyright protection outright, but Rwanda has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text rests only on the quotation exception if the reproduction can be characterised as a short, fair-practice quotation.
That Law defines unfair competition broadly, as any act or practice in the course of industrial or commercial activities that departs from fair commercial practice to obtain a trade advantage, or has that consequence, but confers no sui generis database right, and no located case law applies the unfair-competition definition to data scraping.
The Law relating to the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy, 2021 applies to personal data without a general carve-out for information the data subject has made public, so scraping personal data from a public Rwandan website remains subject to the Law's lawful-basis, purpose-limitation, registration, and cross-border-transfer duties. No Rwandan statute or reported case assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.
Article 16 makes it an offence for a person to intentionally and unlawfully get access to computer or computer system data where the person does not have consent from someone entitled to give it, is not entitled to control or access the data, or accesses another person's computer system without authorization to know recorded or transmitted data, by any means and regardless of location. The offence carries imprisonment of six months to two years and a fine of RWF 1,000,000 to 2,000,000.
None of article 16's three grounds requires infringing a technical security measure; each turns instead on the absence of consent, entitlement, or authorization.
Rwanda's Law No. 26/2017, assented to on and published in Official Gazette No. 27 of , establishes the National Cyber Security Authority (NCSA) and gives it power to set guidelines and standards for cyberspace protection and ICT security within public and private institutions and to audit critical information infrastructure, cyber systems and networks within those institutions where necessary to preserve national security or the public interest (Article 10).
The Law states NCSA's own powers rather than a compliance duty running to a named class of operator, and it leaves the designation of critical information infrastructure itself to a Presidential Order under Article 11.
The Law Governing Information and Communication Technologies (Law No. 24/2016, published in Official Gazette No. 26 of ) imposes its own network-security duties on a narrower, sector-gated class: Article 125 requires an electronic communications network or service provider to take all technical and organisational measures necessary to fully secure its services and networks and to inform users of any security risk arising from a breach of network security, Article 208 places a parallel duty on a provider of public electronic communications services acting in conjunction with a provider of electronic networks services, and Article 207 separately empowers the Minister to issue a Ministerial Order on cyber security.
The Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority administers this sector under the same Law's own regulatory powers.
No enacted Rwandan statute was found setting security requirements a software product or connected device must meet before or after being placed on the market, no vulnerability or incident reporting duty running to a general software or platform provider, and no general reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute reaching a business simply because it holds covered data with no sector gate.
Rwanda's comprehensive data-protection statute, Law No. 058/2021 on the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy, carries its own security-of-processing duty at Article 47, requiring a data controller or processor to adopt appropriate, reasonable technical measures to prevent loss, damage or destruction of personal data; that duty sits inside the comprehensive regime this jurisdiction's privacy row already researches and is not restated here.
No instrument creates a private right of action or names a published enforcement record; NCSA's own powers are advisory, audit and standard-setting rather than adjudicated penalties, and Law No. 60/2018 on Prevention and Punishment of Cybercrimes, which binds an intruder rather than an operator or manufacturer, is researched under this corpus's scraping topic and is not restated here.
Article 10 of the National Bank of Rwanda's Regulation N° 50/2022 on Cyber Security in Regulated Institutions requires a regulated institution to conduct at least annual penetration tests and bi-annual vulnerability assessments. Article 21 of that Regulation requires a regulated institution to notify the Supervisory Authority as promptly as possible, within a period not exceeding two hours from the occurrence of the incident or from a determination that a cyber security incident has occurred.
Article 125 of Law N° 24/2016 requires an electronic communications network or service provider to take all technical and organizational measures necessary to ensure that the services and associated electronic communications networks are fully secured. Article 125 also requires the licensed electronic communications service provider to inform users about any security risks which may occur as a result of a breach of network security measures or protocols.
Article 125 of Law N° 24/2016 requires an electronic communications network or service provider to take all technical and organizational measures necessary to ensure that the services and associated electronic communications networks are fully secured. Article 208 requires a provider of public electronic communications services, in conjunction with a provider of electronic networks services, to take appropriate measures to safeguard the security of those services and networks.
Article 207 provides that the Minister establishes a Ministerial Order relating to cyber security. Article 15 gives the Regulatory Authority the power to monitor the activities of licensed operators and impose administrative sanctions on them. The Law comes into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Rwanda (article 310). The Law was published in Official Gazette 26 of .
Article 28(1) of the Law requires a virtual asset service provider to implement effective systems, processes, controls, policies and procedures to handle risks, including cyber security-related risks to its business and virtual asset activities, and the safety of virtual assets and customer information.
Article 28(2) requires the provider's technology risk management framework to address the risks associated with the generation of cryptographic keys or virtual asset wallets, the signing and approval of transactions, and the storage of cryptographic keys and seed phrases. Article 28(3) requires the provider to establish and maintain sound operational standards, including robust cybersecurity measures.
Article 28(4) requires the provider to keep its operations running without interruption by maintaining backup infrastructure and a disaster recovery and business continuity plan and by periodically testing them. Article 28(5) requires the provider's technology and information security framework to be periodically audited and verified by an independent and qualified auditor. The Regulatory Authority is the Capital Market Authority of Rwanda.
The Law comes into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette. That publication is the Special issue of .
The National Bank of Rwanda, called the Supervisory Authority in the text, issues the Regulation. Article 2 applies the Regulation to all regulated institutions unless specific regulations or directives provide otherwise. Article 3 defines a regulated institution as any financial institution licensed and supervised by the Supervisory Authority. Article 4 makes cyber security governance the responsibility of the Board of Directors and Senior Management.
Article 9 requires a regulated institution to implement and maintain a written cyber security policy that is approved by the board and based on its risk assessment. Article 10 requires a regulated institution to conduct at least annual penetration tests and bi-annual vulnerability assessments. Article 10 also requires the regulated institution to share with the Supervisory Authority an executive summary of the findings of the test within fifteen days after the test.
Article 16 requires multi-factor authentication for any individual accessing the regulated institution’s internal networks from an external network, unless the head of the IT security function or relevant staff has approved in writing the use of reasonably equivalent or more secure access controls. Article 19 requires a regulated institution to implement controls, including encryption, to protect data held or transmitted by it both in transit over external networks and at rest.
Article 20 requires a regulated institution to establish a written incident response management plan designed to promptly respond to, contain and recover from disruptions caused by any cyber incident materially affecting the confidentiality, integrity or availability of its information systems.
Article 22 requires a regulated institution to submit to the Supervisory Authority every year, not later than 15 January, a written statement of self-assessment certifying that its cyber security strategy complies with the Regulation. Article 25 lets the Supervisory Authority apply any sanctions available under the relevant provisions of the relevant specific regulations where a regulated institution fails to satisfy any of the requirements of the Regulation.
Article 26 gave regulated institutions that did not comply with the Regulation one year from its publication in the Official Gazette to comply. The Regulation came into force on its publication in the Official Gazette (article 29). The Regulation was published in the Official Gazette special issue of .
Article 125 of Law N° 24/2016 requires a licensed electronic communications service provider to inform users about any security risks which may occur as a result of a breach of network security measures or protocols and the necessary remedies available to address the breach.
Article 208 requires a service provider, where there is a significant risk to the security of provided services, to inform the subscribers of the risk, any appropriate measures that the subscriber may take to safeguard against that risk and the likely costs to the subscriber of taking such measures. Article 208 also requires the information to be provided to the subscriber free of any charge other than the cost that the subscriber would have incurred for accessing the information.
Article 15 gives the Regulatory Authority the power to monitor the activities of licensed operators and impose administrative sanctions on them. The Law comes into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Rwanda (article 310). The Law was published in Official Gazette 26 of .
Article 21(1) of the Law requires a virtual asset service provider to notify the Regulatory Authority immediately, in writing, where it suspects or has reason to believe that a cyber-attack, including attempted events, that may affect operations and customers is likely to occur or has occurred. The same paragraph also requires immediate notice of the provider's involvement in criminal proceedings and of its opening or ceasing virtual asset business outside Rwanda.
The Regulatory Authority is the Capital Market Authority of Rwanda. The Law comes into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette. That publication is the Special issue of .
Article 2 applies the Regulation to all regulated institutions unless specific regulations or directives provide otherwise. Article 3 defines a regulated institution as any financial institution licensed and supervised by the Supervisory Authority.
Article 3 defines a cyber incident as a cyber event that jeopardizes the cyber security of an information system or the information the system processes, stores or transmits, or that violates the security policies, security procedures or acceptable use policies, whether resulting from malicious activity or not.
Article 21 requires a regulated institution to notify the Supervisory Authority as promptly as possible, within a period not exceeding two hours from the occurrence of the incident or from a determination that a cyber security incident has occurred.
The two-hour notification covers a cyber security incident that may disrupt a regulated institution from continuing its normal operations for customer-facing transactions, and cyber security events that have a reasonable likelihood of materially harming any material part of the normal operations of the institution.
Article 21 also requires the regulated institution to submit the full incident report to the Supervisory Authority within 24 hours from the occurrence of the incident as per the annex to the Regulation. Article 21 allows specific reporting requirements on cyber security incidents to be provided in a Directive.
Appendix 1 sets the format of the cyber security incident report, which records the date and time of the incident, its type or nature, the physical location, the action taken, the time of resolution, the estimated or actual impact, the law enforcement authorities involved and the action taken to mitigate future incidents.
Article 25 lets the Supervisory Authority apply any sanctions available under the relevant provisions of the relevant specific regulations where a regulated institution fails to satisfy any of the requirements of the Regulation. The Regulation came into force on its publication in the Official Gazette (article 29). The Regulation was published in the Official Gazette special issue of .
Rwanda has no adult-content age-verification statute, no social-media minor-access restriction, and no app-store age-verification requirement, but it does have an age-appropriate design duty. The Ministry of Information, Communication, Technology and Innovation issued Ministerial Instructions N° 001/MINICT/2024 of 22/01/2024 on Child Online Protection, in force since their publication in the Official Gazette on .
The instructions bind any person or organisation that broadcasts or provides content online or provides access to online content, a scope reaching general-purpose digital content providers and internet service providers rather than only services aimed at children, and require them to put in place a mechanism to prevent children from accessing age-inappropriate content, sites, products, or interactive services, and to label content for suitability for children.
Separately, Law N° 71/2018 of 31/08/2018 relating to the Protection of the Child criminalises showing a child pornographic images or sounds, recording a child's pornographic picture or voice, and advertising children's pornographic images, but those provisions bind the person who commits those acts rather than imposing an age-verification or age-gating duty on a service.
In April 2026 the Minister of ICT and Innovation said a draft law under review would bar children under sixteen from major social media and video-sharing platforms and would draw on Rwanda's national digital identity system for age verification; as of this review no such bill had been published in the Official Gazette or otherwise located as an official text, so it does not appear as an instrument here.
Article 3 applies these instructions to any person or organisation that broadcasts or provides content online or provides access to online content, a scope not confined to services aimed at children or to social media platforms.
Article 4 requires digital content providers and retailers to make available digital content filtering tools, maintain plans to manage harmful online content, provide a reporting function for users, give a clear external label describing whether platform content is suitable for children, and put in place a mechanism to prevent children from accessing age-inappropriate content, sites, products, or interactive services.
Article 5 requires internet service providers to inform subscribers of risks to children, support reporting of child abuse, block access to child-abuse material once identified, and make parental-control tools available where applicable. Article 6 requires cybercafes and public Wi-Fi providers in public places to proactively block access to sites known for hosting content harmful to children.
Article 7 requires broadcasters and television service providers to indicate the suitability of content for various age categories. It also requires them to implement technical barriers, including parental controls and age-verification tools, so that children are not exposed to harmful content.
Article 8 requires social media users to self-regulate by refraining from creating or publishing videos of child actors in age-inappropriate roles, and from creating or publishing children's images or videos for entertainment or commercial purposes without the consent of a holder of parental responsibility.
The instructions themselves do not define the term child; they are issued pursuant to Law N° 71/2018 relating to the Protection of the Child, which defines a child as any person under eighteen years of age.
Reuse law2 instruments, 1 in force, 1 no longer in force
Research summary (287 words)
Rwanda has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.
The relevant instrument is the Law on the Protection of Intellectual Property, 2024 (Law N° 055/2024), which repealed the 2009 Law on the Protection of Intellectual Property (art. 386). Article 282 of that Law excludes news of the day or miscellaneous facts having the character of mere items of press information from copyright protection outright, so a bare news item is never a protected work under Rwandan law regardless of who first reported it.
Article 297(1)(a) of that Law lets a person reproduce through the press, or broadcast or otherwise communicate to the public, an article on current economic, political, social or religious topics published in newspapers or periodicals, or a broadcast work of the same character, without the author's consent and without payment of royalties, where the right to reproduction, broadcasting or communication to the public has not been expressly reserved.
Article 293 separately permits the use, in the form of quotation, of a short part of a published work, subject to a fair-practice and extent-justified test and an obligation to indicate the source and author. Neither exception is capped at a headline-length threshold beyond that fair-practice test, and no reported Rwandan decision applies either to a systematic news aggregator's reproduction of headlines and snippets, as opposed to a newspaper's own press review or current-events reporting.
The Law contains no text-and-data-mining exception and no mechanism for a machine-readable reservation of rights, so no opt-out of that kind exists either.
Article 282 excludes official legislative, administrative and judicial texts, news of the day or miscellaneous facts having the character of mere items of press information, and any idea, procedure, system, method of operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere data from copyright protection, so a bare news item is never a protected work under Rwandan law, whichever outlet reports it first.
Article 297(1)(a) permits, without the author's consent and without payment of royalties, the reproduction by the press, the broadcasting or the communication to the public of an article published in newspapers or periodicals on current economic, political, social or religious topics, or of a broadcast work of the same character, where the right to reproduction, broadcasting or communication to the public is not expressly reserved.
Article 297(1)(b) permits, on the same terms, the reproduction or communication to the public, for the purpose of reporting short current events, of a work seen or heard during such an event, to the extent justified by the intended informatory purpose.
Article 297(1)(c) permits, on the same terms, the reproduction in the press, the broadcasting or other communication to the public of political speeches, lectures, addresses, sermons or other works of the same nature delivered in public, or speeches delivered during legal proceedings, to the extent justified by the purpose of providing current information. Article 297(2) requires each use under paragraph (1) to indicate the source and the name of the author as far as practicable.
Article 293 permits the use, in the form of quotation or of a short part of a published work, without the author's authorization and without payment of royalties, provided the use is compatible with fair practice and does not exceed the extent justified by the purpose. Article 293(2) requires the quotation to indicate the source and the author's name where it appears in the work quoted.
No longer in force.since repealed Repealed on . The page is kept as a record.
Binds public and private bodies.
What this law does
Article 198 excludes published daily news or news communicated to the public, official legislative, administrative, or judiciary texts, and mere ideas, procedures, systems, methods, concepts, principles, or discoveries from copyright protection: a bare news item is never a protected work under Rwandan law, whichever outlet reports it first.
Article 209 separately permits, without the author's authorization and without payment of remuneration, subject to indicating the source and the author's name as far as practicable: the reproduction in a newspaper or periodical, or the broadcasting or other communication to the public, of an article published in a newspaper or periodical on current economic, political, or religious topics, or a broadcast work of the same character, where the right to reproduction, broadcasting, or communication to the public is not expressly reserved; the reproduction or communication to the public, for the purpose of reporting short current events, of a work seen or heard in the course of those events, to the extent justified by the informatory purpose; and the reproduction, broadcasting, or communication to the public of a political speech, lecture, address, sermon, or similar public address, or a speech delivered during legal proceedings, to the extent justified by the purpose of providing current information.
Article 205 separately permits free reproduction in the form of quotation of a short part of a published work, without authorization or payment, provided the reproduction is compatible with fair practice and does not exceed the extent justified by the purpose, and is accompanied by an indication of source and the author's name where it appears in the work quoted.
None of these three provisions is capped at a headline-length threshold distinct from the fair-practice and informatory-purpose tests they each already carry.
These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.
AI law
Rwanda has no enacted AI-specific statute imposing transparency, output-labelling, risk-management, or governance duties on an AI system's developer or deployer.
Cabinet approved the National AI Policy in April 2023, published by the Ministry of ICT and Innovation, making Rwanda the first African country to adopt a comprehensive national AI policy; the policy sets six strategic pillars, including strengthening AI policy and regulation and ensuring public trust in AI, and states an intention to strengthen the capacity of regulatory authorities to regulate AI, but it is a government strategy document rather than a binding legal instrument, and it names no bot-disclosure, synthetic-content-labelling, or automated-decision duty of the kind this topic covers.
A Cabinet decision reported in June 2026 approved establishing a National Artificial Intelligence Agency to take over AI governance functions from the Ministry's earlier Responsible AI Office, but as of the date of this review no implementing legal instrument establishing the agency's structure or any binding rule it administers had been located in an official source.
The closest binding law reaching automated processing of personal data is Law N° 058/2021 relating to the Protection of Personal Data and Privacy, which is researched under the privacy topic rather than here, because its duty attaches to personal data rather than to an AI system as such.
As of .
Case law
No current case law for Rwanda AI law
No current case law for Rwanda privacy law
No current case law for Rwanda scraping law
No current case law for Rwanda cybersecurity law
No current case law for Rwanda communications law
No current case law for Rwanda content moderation law
No current case law for Rwanda product and AI liability law
No current case law for Rwanda digital accessibility law
No current case law for Rwanda age gating law
No current case law for Rwanda reuse law
Reporting clocks that run here3 instruments
The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Rwanda comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.
Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.
Notify the National Bank of Rwanda as promptly as possible, and within two hours of the occurrence of the incident or of a determination that a cyber security incident has occurred, where the incident may disrupt you from continuing your normal operations for customer-facing transactions or has a reasonable likelihood of materially harming any material part of your normal operations (article 21).
Submit the full incident report to the National Bank of Rwanda within 24 hours of the occurrence of the incident, in the format of Appendix 1 to the Regulation (article 21).
Notify the supervisory authority of the breach within 48 hours of becoming aware of it.
As a data processor, notify the data controller of the breach within 48 hours of becoming aware of it.
Submit a full report on the breach to the supervisory authority within 72 hours, describing its nature, the contact point for more information, the measures taken to address it, and your proposal and timeline for communicating it to affected data subjects.
Notify the Capital Market Authority of Rwanda immediately, in writing, where you suspect or have reason to believe that a cyber-attack, including attempted events, that may affect your operations and customers is likely to occur or has occurred (Article 21(1)(b)).
Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.
AIDrafted with AI
Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made
This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched
to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are
counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own
primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal
advice.