Law / Oman

Oman

14 of 21 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 14 in force. As of .

When each starts12 of 14 carry a date, 2 do not. Earlier is before 2014.
Before 2014: 3 instruments (3 in force) earlier 2014: 0 instruments 2015: 0 instruments ’15 2016: 0 instruments 2017: 0 instruments 2018: 0 instruments 2019: 0 instruments 2020: 0 instruments ’20 2021: 0 instruments 2022: 0 instruments 2023: 8 instruments (8 in force) 2024: 0 instruments 2025: 0 instruments 2026: 1 instrument (1 in force) ’26 today

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 7
  3. Scraping law 4
  4. Cybersecurity law 2
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

Privacy law7 instruments, 7 in force

Research summary (237 words)

Oman's Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) is amended by Royal Decree No. 68/2026, in force from . Article 3, as replaced, carves a short list of processing activities entirely outside the Law's scope, not merely exempt from consent, including national security, the statutory functions of state bodies, and an individual's personal or family processing of data that is not published.

Publicly available data is no longer among them: under new Article 10 bis, item (b), public availability only lifts Article 10's express-consent requirement, for processing that does not contravene the Law, so public personal data stays subject to the Law's other duties.

Article 5 requires a Ministry permit, not merely consent, before processing biometric data, genetic data, health data, racial origin, sex life, political or religious opinions, philosophical beliefs, criminal convictions, or security-measures data, structurally the same heightened prior-authorization gate found in Bahrain, distinct from a mere consent requirement.

Articles 19 and 23 refer breach notification and cross-border transfer to the controls and procedures of the Executive Regulations (Ministerial Decision 34/2024). The Ministry's guidance states that the controller must notify the Ministry within 72 hours of becoming aware of a breach that threatens the rights of affected data subjects, and that approval from the Cyber Defence Centre is required before sensitive personal data is transferred abroad. Cross-border transfer violations carry the highest penalty tier in the Law (100,000 to 500,000 Rial Omani).

Biometric privacy

Personal Data Protection Law, biometric and sensitive data prior permit

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Arts. 1, 5, 5 bis, as amended by Royal Decree No. 68/2026Official Gazette issues 1429 of (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) and 1664 of (Royal Decree No. 68/2026)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 1 defines biometric data as personal data resulting from specific technical processing relating to physical, psychological, or behavioral characteristics, such as a facial image or genetic fingerprint data, naming a facial image as a worked example.

Art. 5 prohibits processing genetic data, biometric data, health data, racial origin, sex life, political or religious opinions, philosophical beliefs, criminal convictions, or security-measures data, except after obtaining a Ministry permit under controls and procedures the Executive Regulations set out.

New Art. 5 bis, added by Royal Decree No. 68/2026, excepts three cases from that rule: the personal data of those working for the controller, where the processing is part of the controller's internal work organization, follows the Law, and discloses nothing to third parties without the data subject's written consent; processing through surveillance devices and cameras used to meet security requirements issued by the competent authorities; and other cases the Minister fixes by decision.

This is a prior-permit model, structurally the same heightened gate found in Bahrain: outside those cases, a service cannot rely on the Data Subject's consent alone to process biometric data in Oman. No modality-specific voice provision exists beyond the general definition, which would still reach a voiceprint as a behavioral characteristic enabling identification.

The Law sets no retention period or destruction duty specific to biometric data, and replacement Article 15 requires the controller and the processor to erase personal data immediately upon the end of the purpose of its processing, save for an existing dispute or a legal obligation.

What it requires

Breach notification

Personal Data Protection Law, breach notification

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Art. 19, breach notification provisionOfficial Gazette issue 1429 of , Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs (Arabic)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Royal Decree requires the Controller, in the event of a personal data breach leading to destruction, alteration, disclosure, access, or illegal processing, to notify the Ministry and the Data Subject of the breach, in accordance with the controls and procedures the Executive Regulations set.

The Ministry's guidance on the Law and its Executive Regulations states that the controller must notify the Ministry within 72 hours of becoming aware of any breach that threatens the rights of affected data subjects. The same guidance states that the controller must notify the data subject within 72 hours if the breach poses serious harm or high risk.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Personal Data Protection Law, comprehensive regime and scope

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Arts. 3-4, 7, as amended by Royal Decree No. 68/2026Official Gazette issues 1429 of (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) and 1664 of (Royal Decree No. 68/2026)

In force since , effective . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 2, as replaced by Royal Decree No. 68/2026, applies the Law to the processing of personal data of natural persons in Oman, whether the processing takes place inside or outside Oman.

Art. 3, as replaced, excludes six kinds of processing from the Law's scope: national security and the public interest, the statutory functions of state administrative bodies and other public legal persons, protection of the state's economic and financial interests, crime detection or prevention on a formal written request from an investigating authority, processing by an individual in a personal or family setting unless the data is published, and historical, scientific, statistical, literary or economic research and statistics by authorized bodies that cannot be traced to an identifiable person.

Art. 4 sets a general coverage default for anything not excluded: personal data is protected under the Law.

The Ministry of Transport, Communications and Information Technology implements the Law under Art. 7, as replaced: it prepares the controls and procedures for protecting personal data, issues the procedures for processing and for checking that controllers and processors comply, receives and decides complaints, cooperates with foreign data protection bodies, advises and coordinates with state bodies, and accredits the external auditors who assess compliance.

What it requires

Personal Data Protection Law, proof of express consent, external audit and processing documents

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Arts. 10 (as replaced by Royal Decree No. 68/2026), 16, 17official legislation text, Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs, Official Gazette issues 1429 and 1664

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 10, as replaced by Royal Decree No. 68/2026, requires the controller to prove the data subject's express consent to the processing of the data subject's personal data. Article 16 requires the controller and processor, at the Ministry's request, to appoint an external auditor to verify that the processing was carried out under the Law, and to give the Ministry a copy of the auditor's report.

Article 17 requires the controller and processor to keep documents of processing operations for the periods and under the procedures the Executive Regulation sets.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Personal Data Protection Law, cross-border transfer

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Art. 23Official Gazette issue 1429 of , Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs (Arabic)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 23 permits a Controller to transfer personal data outside Oman, and to allow its transfer, in accordance with the controls and procedures the Executive Regulations set, without prejudice to the Cyber Defence Centre's own competences, and bars the transfer of personal data that was processed in breach of the Law or whose transfer would harm the data subject. The Law states no adequacy test and no list of approved countries.

The Ministry's guidance on the Law and its Executive Regulations states that, as a rule, the controller must obtain the data subject's consent before transferring personal data abroad, with exceptions where the transfer is required to fulfill an international obligation under a treaty to which Oman is a party or is carried out in a way that ensures the data subject cannot be identified.

The same guidance states that approval from the Cyber Defence Centre is required only where sensitive personal data will be stored or processed outside Oman, and that for non-sensitive data no other authority's approval is required, provided the transfer complies with the safeguards in the Regulations. A violation of Article 23 carries the highest fine tier in the Law (100,000 to 500,000 Rial Omani).

What it requires

Data subject rights

Personal Data Protection Law, data subject rights

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Art. 11Official Gazette issue 1429 of , Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs (Arabic)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 11 gives the data subject six rights: (a) revoke consent to processing, without affecting processing that already took place, (b) request amendment, updating, or blocking of their personal data, (c) obtain a copy of their processed personal data, (d) transfer their personal data to another controller (portability), (e) request erasure, unless processing is necessary for national archiving and documentation, and (f) be notified of any breach or infringement of their personal data and the actions taken in response.

No separate right to object to processing was found in Art. 11; the closest analog is the consent-revocation right at (a), which is narrower since it presupposes the processing rested on consent. Art. 12 separately gives a right to complain to the Ministry. These rights apply to a data subject's personal data generally, biometric identifiers included, since Art. 11 is not limited to any particular data category.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Personal Data Protection Law, enforcement and penalties

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Art. 8, penalties provisions, as amended by Royal Decree No. 68/2026Official Gazette issues 1429 of (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) and 1664 of (Royal Decree No. 68/2026)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Art. 8 gives the Ministry power to warn, order rectification or erasure, suspend processing (temporarily or permanently), and suspend cross-border transfer for a violation of the Law.

A five-tier fine structure by article violated: 500-2,000 Rial Omani for Art. 10 violations (Art. 25, as replaced by Royal Decree No. 68/2026); 1,000-5,000 for Arts. 15-18, 20, 22 (Art. 26); 5,000-10,000 for Arts. 13 and 14 (Art. 27, as replaced); 15,000-20,000 for Arts. 5, 6, 19, 21 (Art. 28, including the biometric or sensitive-data permit requirement and child-data processing); and 100,000-500,000, far the highest tier, for Art. 23 (cross-border transfer) violations (Art. 29).

A legal person is separately fined 5,000-100,000 Rial Omani where the violation is committed in its name or on its account by its chair, a board member, its manager or another responsible person, with that person's consent, concealment or gross negligence, without prejudice to the criminal liability of natural persons (Art. 30). The Law states no private right of action; enforcement runs through the Ministry's measures and the fines in Chapter Five.

What it requires

Scraping law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (351 words)

Oman has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Cybercrime Combat Law (Royal Decree No. 61/2026, which repealed and replaced the 2011 cybercrime law) criminalizes intentionally accessing a website, information system, or information-technology means without right, exceeding authorized access, or continuing access once aware it is unauthorized, with an escalating penalty where the intrusion damages, discloses, or destroys the target and a further escalation where the data involved is personal; the base offense's definition turns on access being without right or exceeding authorization, and does not on its own terms require defeating a technical security measure.

The Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (Royal Decree No. 65/2008) excludes ideas, procedures, mathematical concepts, and mere data from copyright protection outright, along with news of the day and current events that are mere journalistic information, though a compilation of such material is protected where the compilation, arrangement, or intellectual effort behind it is itself distinguished; its free-uses article permits quotation for clarification or criticism and a single reproduction of a computer program by its lawful owner, but carries no text-and-data-mining exception.

The same Law protects a database or other compilation of data as a derivative work only where it is creative as to the selection or arrangement of its contents, conferring no separate sui generis database right of the kind the European Union's Database Directive creates.

The Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree No. 6/2022), already researched under this jurisdiction's privacy record, no longer excludes publicly available data from its scope: Royal Decree No. 68/2026 replaced Article 3 with effect from , and public availability now only lifts the Law's express-consent requirement (new Article 10 bis, item (b)), so a scraper collecting the publicly posted personal data of an individual in Oman remains subject to the Law's other duties.

No Omani statute or reported case has been located on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper, and none establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation, or trespass doctrine distinct from general law, or assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Cybercrime Combat Law, unauthorized access to a website or information system

Royal Decree No. 61/2026, Art. 5official consolidated Law Combating Information Technology Crimes text

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 5 (Chapter Two, Encroachment on Data or Electronic Information and Information Systems) punishes whoever intentionally, without right, enters a website, an information system, or an information-technology means, or exceeds authorized access to it, or continues access once aware it is unauthorized, with imprisonment of one to six months and a fine of 100 to 1,000 Omani Rial, or either penalty.

Where that access results in the deletion, alteration, addition, modification, distortion, damage, copying, destruction, blocking, encryption, disclosure, or republication of data or electronic information, or in destroying the website, harming its users, or occupying its domain name or address, the penalty rises to imprisonment of six months to one year and a fine of 1,000 to 3,000 Omani Rial, or either penalty.

Where the data or electronic information reached under that second paragraph is personal data, the penalty rises again to imprisonment of one to three years and a fine of 2,000 to 5,000 Omani Rial, or either penalty. A guardian, custodian, curator, or caregiver who acted to protect the interest of a person lacking or having diminished legal capacity is exempted from punishment.

The Decree's own text states it takes effect the day after its Official Gazette publication and was issued on 15 Dhul Hijjah 1447H (), repealing the prior cybercrime law issued by Royal Decree No. 12/2011. It was published in Official Gazette issue 1651 of , so it took effect on .

What it requires

Copyright and text and data mining (TDM)

Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, exceptions and absence of a text-and-data-mining exception

Royal Decree No. 65/2008, Arts. 4, 20official English translation by the Ministry of Legal Affairs, Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (Royal Decree No. 65/2008), WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 4 excludes mere ideas, procedures, working methods, mathematical concepts, principles, discoveries, and data from copyright protection, along with official documents and news of the day and current events that are mere journalistic information, though a compilation or arrangement of that excluded material is protected where it is itself distinguished.

Article 20 permits, without the author's consent, quoting paragraphs from a protected work lawfully made available to the public for clarification, explanation, or criticism, to the extent justified by that purpose, and permits the lawful owner of a copy of a computer program to reproduce a single copy for the purpose and extent the program was obtained, for archival purposes, or to replace a lost or destroyed copy.

Neither Article 20 nor any other section located creates a text-and-data-mining exception or a machine-readable reservation mechanism, so training a model on scraped Omani-copyrighted text or copying more than the narrow free-uses allowance rests on none of the Law's own exceptions.

Article 52 punishes copyright infringement, without prejudice to a more severe sanction under any other law, with imprisonment of three months to three years and a fine of 2,000 to 10,000 Omani Rial, or either penalty.

What it requires

Database right

Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, database compilations and absence of a sui generis right

Royal Decree No. 65/2008, Arts. 2(b), 3(c), 4official English translation by the Ministry of Legal Affairs, Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (Royal Decree No. 65/2008), WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 2(b) lists computer programs and databases, whether machine-readable or otherwise, among the categories of protected works. Article 3(c) narrows that to compilations of data or other material, whether in machine-readable or other form, which by reason of the selection and arrangement of their contents constitute intellectual creations, without prejudice to any copyright subsisting in the underlying content.

No separate sui generis or producer's database right, of the kind the European Union's Database Directive creates, was located in the sections read; a merely comprehensive, non-creatively-arranged database compiled by a scraper's target falls outside this protection, and Article 4's exclusion of mere data from copyright protection means the underlying facts a scraper extracts are not themselves protected even where the compiler's selection or arrangement is.

What it requires

Personal data

Personal Data Protection Law, reach over scraped public personal data

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Arts. 2-3 and 10 bis, as amended by Royal Decree No. 68/2026 (formerly Art. 3(j))Official Gazette issues 1429 of (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) and 1664 of (Royal Decree No. 68/2026)

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Royal Decree No. 68/2026 replaced Article 3, which no longer lists lawfully publicly available data among the processing excluded from the Personal Data Protection Law (the former Art. 3(j)).

Replacement Article 2 applies the Law to the processing of personal data of natural persons in Oman, inside or outside Oman, and replacement Article 3 excludes only a short list of processing: national security and the public interest, the statutory functions of state bodies, protection of the state's economic and financial interests, crime detection or prevention on a formal written request, personal or family processing unless the data is published, and de-identified research and statistics.

Public availability now matters only as an exception to the express-consent rule in Article 10: new Article 10 bis, item (b), lets a controller process personal data without that consent where the data is available to the public and the processing does not contravene the Law.

A scraper collecting personal data of an individual in Oman from a public page therefore remains subject to the Law's other duties (security, purpose limitation, cross-border transfer, breach notification), and a biometric identifier such as a faceprint or voiceprint derived from publicly posted photographs, video, or audio still needs a Ministry permit under Art. 5, which Article 10 bis does not lift.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (553 words)

Oman has no enacted product-security or connected-device statute, no general vulnerability-handling or incident-reporting duty running from a private business to a regulator outside the Central Bank's open-banking framework, and no standalone reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute reaching a business simply because it holds data.

The Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs' own consolidated index of primary legislation, covering every law in force through the newest 2026 Royal Decrees, carries no title answering to any of those descriptions.

The Cybercrime Combat Law (Royal Decree No. 61/2026, which replaced the 2011 cybercrime law) is an intruder-offense statute only: read in full for any duty a service provider or system operator carries to secure a system or report an incident, it sets none, only Article 5's escalating penalties for a person who accesses a website, information system, or information-technology means without right, already this jurisdiction's scraping row rather than restated here.

Oman's Personal Data Protection Law (Royal Decree No. 6/2022) carries its own security-of-processing duty at Article 13, requiring a Controller to determine the risks its processing exposes a data subject to and to put in place the technical and procedural measures needed to guarantee lawful processing, an article inside the comprehensive regime this jurisdiction's privacy row already researches, the same architecture as the General Data Protection Regulation's Article 32, so it is not repeated here.

The Law's breach-notification duty, requiring the Controller to notify the Ministry and the affected Data Subject of a breach, is likewise already the privacy row's finding.

Two of the Law's own provisions, Article 7 on the Ministry's implementing duties and Article 23 on cross-border transfer, are each stated without prejudice to the competences prescribed to a Cyber Defence Centre, naming a distinct body with its own cyber-related authority; no enabling law, decree, or regulation setting that Centre's own duties is confirmed at primary source, so its remit is named here rather than described.

The Ministry of Transport, Communications and Information Technology, whose portfolio includes Oman's national CERT, publishes an IT-governance policy, an IT-risk-management policy, and an IT-operations-continuity policy binding government entities' own systems rather than the private sector generally; a cloud-governance framework and administrative standards for managed IT services aimed at government service delivery; and a Security Assessment Services Standard governing a class of Ministry-licensed penetration-testing and security-assessment providers, a licensed-provider duty no declared activity in this corpus's vocabulary can express and so named here rather than flagged, the same treatment this profile gives Singapore's Cybersecurity Act licensing part and the financial-entity classes DORA and New York's Department of Financial Services Part 500 bind.

None of the Ministry's published laws, regulations, policies, or circulars sets a product-security, vulnerability-disclosure, or incident-reporting duty on a software product or online service generally. The Central Bank of Oman's Open Banking Regulatory Framework sets security and incident-reporting duties for licensed payment service providers, filed as rows of their own.

The Central Bank of Oman's Open Banking Regulatory Framework requires a licensee to comply with Annexure 3, the Open Banking Data and Information Security Specification, to obtain a license and while providing Open Banking Services.

The same Framework requires a licensee to notify the Central Bank of Oman of major operational or security incidents that have or could have a significantly negative impact on the financial interests of customers, banks, payment service provider licensees or financial institutions.

Sector security regimes

Central Bank of Oman Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Cybersecurity and Information Security

Central Bank of Oman Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Article 5 and Annexure 3Text of the Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Central Bank of Oman

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Framework is effective from the date of issuance unless otherwise specified. Article 5 requires an applicant to comply with Annexure 3, the Open Banking Data and Information Security Specification, to obtain a license, and requires the licensee to continue to comply with it while providing Open Banking Services.

Article 6.8.3 requires licensees to comply with Annexure 3 to mitigate the cybersecurity risks that arise from the use of APIs for interconnectivity between licensees and banks, payment service provider licensees or financial institutions. Annexure 3 states that new technology deployments must undergo security testing before go-live. Annexure 3 states that logging mechanisms should record both successful and unsuccessful occurrences of security events.

Article 10.1 provides that the Central Bank may, after due process, carry out remedial action or impose penalties on a non-compliant licensee as applicable under the National Payment Systems Law and the Banking Law.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Central Bank of Oman Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Notification of Security Incidents

Central Bank of Oman Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Article 6.6.3 and Annexure 3 section 13.3.1(f)Text of the Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Central Bank of Oman

In force. Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Framework is effective from the date of issuance unless otherwise specified. Article 6.6.3(c)(ii) requires a licensee to notify the Central Bank of major operational or security incidents that have or could have a significantly negative impact on the financial interests of customers, banks, payment service provider licensees or financial institutions, or the licensee itself.

Article 6.6.3(c)(i) requires a licensee to notify the Central Bank of incidents where there is knowledge or suspicion of fraud committed or intended against customers or the licensee itself. Annexure 3 states that any security breach resulting in loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure or access to data, or any cybersecurity incident such as malware, ransomware or denial-of-service attacks, must be promptly reported to the relevant authorities.

Article 10.1 provides that the Central Bank may, after due process, carry out remedial action or impose penalties on a non-compliant licensee as applicable under the National Payment Systems Law and the Banking Law.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (210 words)

Oman has no press-publisher neighbouring right and no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code; the Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (Royal Decree No. 65/2008) is the only instrument reaching an aggregator's reproduction of news content.

Article 4 excludes news of the day and current events that are mere journalistic information from copyright protection outright, alongside official documents, ideas, procedures, mathematical concepts, and data, but its closing sentence restores protection to a compilation or arrangement of that excluded material where the compilation, arrangement, or any intellectual effort behind it is itself distinguished.

Article 20(4) separately lets the press reproduce, broadcast, or make available to the public portions of articles published in newspapers or periodicals on current economic, political, or religious topics, and broadcast works of the same character, unless the right owner expressly reserved that right at the time of publication; the exception carries no headline-length or short-extract cap distinct from that reservation test.

No Omani statute or reported case has been located addressing whether a hyperlink is a communication to the public, whether framing or inline display changes the answer, or a hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and the Law predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.

Snippet reproduction

Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights, news exclusion and press-reproduction exception

Royal Decree No. 65/2008, Arts. 4, 20(4)official English translation, Law on Copyright and Neighboring Rights (Royal Decree No. 65/2008), WIPO Lex

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Article 4 excludes ideas, procedures, working methods, mathematical concepts, principles, discoveries, and data from copyright protection, and separately excludes official documents and news of the day and current events that are mere journalistic information; a compilation or arrangement of that excluded material, or any creation or intellectual effort behind it, is nonetheless protected where it is itself distinguished.

Article 20(4) permits the press to reproduce, broadcast, or make available to the public portions of articles published in newspapers or periodicals on current economic, political, or religious topics, and broadcast works of the same character, provided the right owner did not expressly reserve that right at the time of publication.

The Law creates no press-publisher neighbouring right, no compelled platform-to-publisher bargaining regime, and no hot-news or misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and it predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.

What it requires

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Oman has not enacted a binding statute imposing an AI-transparency or output-labeling duty: a duty to disclose that content is AI-generated, to label or watermark synthetic output, or to disclose that a user is talking to a bot.

The Ministry of Transport, Communications and Information Technology published a General Policy for the Safe and Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems on , describing it as setting a comprehensive strategic framework for the responsible, safe, and effective adoption of artificial intelligence technologies in Oman, focused on fostering innovation, supporting economic and developmental sectors, building national capabilities, and integrating legislation with technology.

The Ministry's own site lists that policy under a Policies library category, separate from the Laws category holding Oman's Cybercrime Combat Law and Personal Data Protection Law, and its own published text names it a policy rather than a decree or an act, with no fine or enforcement provision described.

A separate National Programme for Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Digital Technologies, an economic development programme reported as run by the Information Technology Authority and targeting growth in the digital economy's share of gross domestic product, is likewise a government economic strategy rather than a regulatory instrument; its content is not confirmed at primary source.

Oman's binding Cybercrime Combat Law, Royal Decree No. 61/2026, replaced Royal Decree No. 12/2011 on and criminalizes conduct that could be carried out with artificial intelligence, such as unauthorized system access, but its content is not confirmed at primary source, so no AI-specific transparency or labeling duty is asserted for it here.

As of .

Age gating law

Oman has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code.

The Child Law (Royal Decree No. 22/2014) defines a child as any human being who has not completed eighteen years of age by the Gregorian calendar (Art. 1(d)) and criminalizes publishing, displaying, circulating, or possessing publications or audiovisual works that appeal to a child's base instincts or normalize conduct contrary to societal values, law, or public order (Art. 56(e)), but its text carries no reference to the internet, a digital platform, or any age-verification or age-gating duty on a service provider.

The Cybercrime Combat Law (Royal Decree No. 61/2026, which repealed and replaced Royal Decree No. 12/2011) likewise carries no child- or minor-specific provision among its unauthorized-access and data-interference offenses; its only capacity-linked clause is a general exemption from punishment for a guardian, custodian, curator, or caregiver acting to protect the interest of a person lacking or having diminished legal capacity, which is not an age-verification duty on a platform.

The Consumer Protection Law (Royal Decree No. 66/2014) was checked directly at primary source and carries no child- or minor-related provision either. No further age-verification, social-media, app-store, or design-code statute has been located at primary source.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Oman AI law
  • No current case law for Oman privacy law
  • No current case law for Oman scraping law
  • No current case law for Oman cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Oman communications law
  • No current case law for Oman content moderation law
  • No current case law for Oman product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Oman digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Oman age gating law
  • No current case law for Oman reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here2 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Oman comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

72 hours
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Oman

72 hours

Personal Data Protection Law, breach notification

Royal Decree No. 6/2022, Art. 19, breach notification provisionprivacy law, in force since

The sentence the clocks are read from

An app that suffers a breach leading to the destruction, alteration, disclosure, access, or illegal processing of an individual's personal data in Oman must notify the Ministry and the affected Data Subject, following the procedure the Executive Regulations set; the Ministry's guidance puts the notice to the Ministry at 72 hours from awareness of a breach that threatens data subjects' rights, and the notice to the Data Subject at 72 hours where the breach poses serious harm or high risk.

promptly

Central Bank of Oman Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Notification of Security Incidents

Central Bank of Oman Open Banking Regulatory Framework, Article 6.6.3 and Annexure 3 section 13.3.1(f)security law, in force

The sentence the clocks are read from

Promptly report to the relevant authorities any security breach resulting in the inadvertent or unlawful loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure or access to data, or any incident related to cybersecurity such as malware, ransomware or denial-of-service attacks, after assessing its impact as high, medium or low, and adhere to the appropriate reporting timelines (Annexure 3, section 13.3.1(f)).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.