Law / Botswana

Botswana

12 of 13 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 10 in force and 2 not yet in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 7
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law 2
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law7 instruments, 7 in force

Research summary (413 words)

Botswana's comprehensive personal-data statute is the Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), passed by the National Assembly on , assented to on , published in Government Gazette Extraordinary Vol. LXII, No. 144 of , and brought into force on by Statutory Instrument 4 of 2025, repealing the earlier Data Protection Act, 2018 (Cap. 43:14).

It applies to automated and non-automated processing of personal data by a controller or processor established in Botswana, and reaches a foreign controller or processor that offers goods or services to people in Botswana or monitors their behaviour there; it binds the State and excludes only purely personal or household processing and specified state functions such as national security, defence, and law enforcement, to the extent adequate safeguards exist elsewhere.

It prohibits processing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, genetic data, biometric data used to uniquely identify a person, health data, and sex-life or sexual-orientation data, subject to listed exceptions including the data subject's explicit consent and data the data subject has manifestly made public.

A controller must notify the Information and Data Protection Commission within 72 hours of becoming aware of a personal-data breach, where feasible, unless the breach is unlikely to risk a person's rights and freedoms, and must communicate the breach to the affected person without undue delay where the risk is high. Processing a child's personal data for an information-society service offered directly to them needs parental or guardian consent unless the child is at least sixteen.

A data subject has the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal or similarly significant effects, subject to narrow exceptions and safeguards including human intervention and a right to contest the decision.

A transfer of personal data to a third country or an international organisation needs an adequacy finding by the Commission, appropriate safeguards such as standard contractual clauses, approved binding corporate rules, or a listed derogation, and the Act additionally requires that a copy of any transferred personal data remain in Botswana for the period of processing.

Enforcement combines administrative fines the Commission can impose directly, a private right to compensation for a data subject who suffers material or non-material damage from a contravention, and criminal offences for failing to implement required security safeguards, selling personal data, or otherwise contravening the Act where no other penalty is specified.

Breach notification

Data Protection Act, 2024, personal data breach notification

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), ss. 63-64Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 63(1) requires a data controller to notify the Information and Data Protection Commission of a personal-data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of the data subject, and section 63(2) requires reasons for any later notification.

Section 63(3) requires a data processor to notify the data controller of a personal-data breach without undue delay after becoming aware of it. Section 64(1) requires the data controller to communicate a personal-data breach to the affected data subject without undue delay where the breach is likely to result in a high risk to that person's rights and freedoms.

What it requires

Comprehensive regime

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024)

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), ss. 1-5, 19-28, 51-62, 65-73Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

The Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024) applies to automated and non-automated processing of personal data by a controller or processor established in Botswana, and reaches a foreign controller or processor that offers goods or services to people in Botswana or monitors their behaviour there; it binds the State and excludes only purely personal or household processing and specified state functions.

A controller or processor must process personal data lawfully, fairly and transparently, only for a specified and legitimate purpose, and must collect no more than is adequate and relevant to that purpose. Where processing is based on consent, the controller must be able to demonstrate that the data subject consented, and a data subject may withdraw consent at any time.

A controller and processor must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures, including data protection by design and by default, to secure personal data at a level appropriate to the risk and to be able to demonstrate compliance with the Act.

A controller must carry out a data protection impact assessment before processing that is likely to result in a high risk to a natural person's rights and freedoms, and a controller or processor must designate a data protection officer where its core activities require regular and systematic large-scale monitoring, or large-scale processing of sensitive personal data or of data relating to criminal convictions and offences.

What it requires

Cross border transfer

Data Protection Act, 2024, transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), Part XIV (ss. 74-79)Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 74 requires any transfer of personal data from a data controller or data processor in Botswana to a data controller, data processor or other recipient in a third country or an international organisation, including an onward transfer, to be carried out under Part XIV, and additionally requires a copy of the transferred personal data to remain in Botswana for the period of processing.

Sections 75 to 78 permit a transfer where the Commission has made an adequacy decision, appropriate safeguards such as standard contractual clauses are in place, approved binding corporate rules apply, or a listed derogation applies.

What it requires

Data subject rights

Data Protection Act, 2024, automated decisions

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), s. 49 (automated individual decisions)Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 49 gives a data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or significantly affects them. The right does not apply where the decision is necessary for entering into or performing a contract, is based on the data subject's explicit consent, or is authorized by a law.

Where the decision rests on the contract or consent exception, the data controller must implement suitable safeguards, including letting the data subject obtain human intervention, express their point of view, and contest the decision.

What it requires

Data Protection Act, 2024, rights of data subjects

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), Part VIII (ss. 37-48)Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A data subject has the right to obtain confirmation of whether their personal data is being processed and, where it is, access to it together with information on the purpose of processing, the categories of data, the recipients, the retention period, and the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling.

A data controller must act on a data subject's request to rectify, erase, restrict the processing of, port, or object to the processing of their personal data, and must inform the data subject of the outcome without undue delay and, in any event, within one month of receipt of the request, extendable by up to two further months with the Commission's approval.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Data Protection Act, 2024, compensation, administrative fines and offences

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), Part XV (ss. 80-84)Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

A data subject may lodge a complaint with the Information and Data Protection Commission if they consider that processing of their personal data contravenes the Act, and the Commission must inform the complainant of the progress and outcome of the complaint. A person who suffers material or non-material damage from a contravention of the Act is entitled to compensation from the data controller or data processor.

The Commission may impose an administrative fine of up to P50,000,000, or four percent of an undertaking's total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher, for a contravention of the processing principles and consent conditions, data-subject rights, cross-border transfer rules, an obligation under a restricting law, or a Commission order, and a lower fine of up to P10,000,000, or two percent of worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher, for a contravention of the children's-consent duty or the data-protection-by-design duty specifically.

A person who fails to implement required security safeguards, who sells personal data, or who otherwise contravenes the Act where no other penalty is specified, commits an offence carrying a fine of up to P500,000 or imprisonment of up to nine years, or both.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Data Protection Act, 2024, sensitive personal data and children's data

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), s. 29, Part VI (ss. 30-33)Data Protection Act

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 29 makes processing of a child's personal data for an information-society service offered directly to them lawful only where a parent or a person with parental duties over the child has given or authorised consent, except that a child who is sixteen years of age may consent themselves.

Section 30(1) prohibits processing personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade-union membership, and prohibits processing genetic data, biometric data used to uniquely identify a person, health data, or data concerning a person's sex life or sexual orientation, subject to the exceptions listed in section 30(2), including the data subject's explicit consent and data the data subject has manifestly made public.

Section 32 confines processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences to control by a public authority, or to processing authorised by a law that provides appropriate safeguards.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (465 words)

Open-web crawling of public pages carries no dedicated Botswana statute.

The applicable authority for unauthorized-access questions is the Cybercrime and Computer Related Crimes Act, 2018 (Act No. 18 of 2018), which criminalizes intentionally accessing or attempting to access all or part of a computer or computer system knowing the access is unauthorised, or causing a computer system to perform a function as a result of such unauthorised access (section 4), and separately criminalizes securing unauthorised access to a computer service or intercepting data (section 5); no Botswana court decision construes how authorisation is read for a public, unauthenticated page, and the Act's own definition of "unauthorised access" turns on entitlement or consent rather than on any technical measure, so it does not by its terms exempt a public page.

The Act was assented to on and came into force on by Statutory Instrument 83 of 2018; the current consolidated Laws of Botswana list its provisions under Chapter 08:06, which the Act itself confirms it repeals and re-enacts.

The Act carries no exemption for a search engine, indexer, or host from liability for unauthorised access or interference; its only host-facing duty is a bar on a service provider disclosing that a preservation, production, or surveillance order has been made against it (section 23).

No statute or case law addressing terms-of-service enforceability (browsewrap versus clickwrap), or whether login or acceptance of terms changes the legal picture, exists; ordinary contract-formation principles under Botswana's general law of contract would be the applicable general law for a contract-formation question, but this is unsettled rather than a specific regime.

Copyright protects a database only as a compilation, never through a separate sui generis right: the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, 2000 (Cap. 68:02, as amended by Act 6 of 2006) defines "literary work" to include "a table of compilation", and separately withholds the Act's private-reproduction exception from "the whole or a substantial part of a data base", so a database that is an intellectual creation through the selection or arrangement of its contents is protected as a literary work, while the underlying facts and data are not protected as such.

Personal-data reach over scraped public personal data is governed by the Data Protection Act, 2024, researched in full under the privacy topic; its scope provisions carry no publicly-available-data exemption, so ordinary personal data scraped from a public source remains within the regime's reach, and processing that reveals a sensitive category, including a biometric identifier used to uniquely identify a person, is prohibited unless a listed exception applies, one of which is data the data subject has manifestly made public.

No specific unfair-competition or misappropriation doctrine addressed to scraping, and no case law or regulatory statement giving robots.txt legal weight or addressing AI-training-specific access rules, exists.

Cybersecurity law2 instruments, 2 not yet in force

Research summary (510 words)

Botswana has no standalone product-security statute, no manufacturer duty comparable to the Cyber Resilience Act or the United Kingdom's Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act.

The Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024) requires a data controller to implement security safeguards under its own Part XI, with a criminal offence in section 84 for failing to do so, but that duty is one clause of a comprehensive personal-data statute rather than a standalone security regime, so it is researched in full as this jurisdiction's privacy row and is not restated here.

The Cybercrime and Computer Related Crimes Act, 2018 (Act No. 18 of 2018) criminalises unauthorised access to a computer system and, at section 13, to critical national infrastructure specifically, but every offence it creates binds the person who commits it against a system rather than the system's own operator or manufacturer, and its only provider-facing duty, section 23's bar on a service provider disclosing that a preservation, production, or surveillance order was made against it, is a secrecy duty tied to a criminal investigation rather than a security-posture requirement; the whole Act is researched under the scraping topic's computer-misuse family and is not restated here.

Two sector-gated security regimes exist, and each binds a defined class of regulated entity rather than a business because it develops or distributes software as such, so neither is presented here as a duty against a general software product.

The Electronic Communications and Transactions Act, 2014 (Act No. 14 of 2014, in force from ) and its 2016 Regulations make the Botswana Communications Regulatory Authority (BOCRA) responsible for accrediting Certification Authorities that offer secure electronic signature services, for setting the Accredited Certification Service Standards a Certification Authority must meet, and for appointing the auditors who audit them under those Regulations; the current Standards, published August 2017, require a security management programme aligned to ISO 21188, asset classification, personnel vetting, physical and system-access controls, and a business-continuity and incident-management plan under which a Certification Authority must immediately report a security breach to the Authority.

The Bank of Botswana has issued Guidelines on Cybersecurity and Resilience under section 4C of the Bank of Botswana (Amendment) Act, 2022, in support of the Banking Act, 2023, for banks operating in Botswana.

The Ministry of Transport and Communications' National Cybersecurity Strategy, developed with the Commonwealth Telecommunications Organisation, recommends establishing a national Computer Incident Response Team and sets out stakeholder roles, but it is a policy strategy rather than a binding instrument. No general reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute binds a Botswana business with no sector gate.

The National Cybersecurity Authority designates critical national information infrastructure by Notice in the Gazette under section 45(1) of the Cybersecurity Act, 2025. Section 53(2) of the Cybersecurity Act, 2025 requires an owner of designated infrastructure to submit a preliminary incident report within not more than eight hours of notifying the Botswana Computer Security Incident Response Team.

Section 1 of the Cybersecurity Act, 2025 brings the Act into operation on the date the Minister appoints by Order published in the Gazette.

Sector security regimes

Cybersecurity Act, Critical National Information Infrastructure Regime

Cybersecurity Act, 2025 (Act No. 21 of 2025), ss. 45-52Official text of the Cybersecurity Act

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 45(1) of the Act has the National Cybersecurity Authority designate, by Notice in the Gazette, an information or information infrastructure relevant to a critical sector as a critical information or critical national information infrastructure. Section 2 of the Act includes among the critical sectors telecommunications and IT systems, transport, energy, water, the financial sector, healthcare, and public and e-government services.

Section 45(3) of the Act requires the owner of a designated information or information infrastructure to comply with such baseline security requirements as may be prescribed. Section 47(1) of the Act requires the owner to register the critical information or critical national information infrastructure with the Authority within 14 days of the designation.

Section 49(1) of the Act requires an owner to host critical information or critical national information infrastructure within Botswana, and section 49(2) lets the Authority authorise hosting outside Botswana. Section 50(1) of the Act requires an owner to seek the approval of the Authority of any change of ownership within seven days of the change.

Section 51(1) of the Act has the Authority carry out a periodic audit and inspection on critical information and critical national information infrastructure to ensure compliance with the Act. Section 47(2) of the Act makes an owner that is a company liable to an administrative penalty not exceeding 10 per cent of its annual turnover, and an owner that is a natural person liable to a fine not exceeding P100 000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or to both.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Cybersecurity Act, Reporting of Cybersecurity Incidents

Cybersecurity Act, 2025 (Act No. 21 of 2025), s. 53Official text of the Cybersecurity Act

Not yet in force

Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 53(1) of the Act requires an owner of critical information or critical national information infrastructure to notify the Botswana Computer Security Incident Response Team immediately of a perceived or actual cybersecurity incident in respect of that information or infrastructure.

Section 53(1)(b) of the Act extends the notice to a cybersecurity incident in respect of any computer, computer system or information system under the owner's control that is interconnected or communicates with critical information or critical national information infrastructure.

Section 53(2) of the Act requires an owner to submit a preliminary cybersecurity incident report to the Botswana Computer Security Incident Response Team immediately after the incident is detected and within not more than eight hours of notifying the Team of the incident. Section 53(3) of the Act requires an owner to submit a detailed cybersecurity incident report to the Botswana Computer Security Incident Response Team as soon as the incident is resolved.

Section 53(5) of the Act makes an owner that is a company liable to an administrative penalty not exceeding 10 per cent of its annual turnover, and an owner that is a natural person liable to a fine not exceeding P100 000, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or to both.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (373 words)

Botswana has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognized hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.

The relevant instrument is the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, 2000 (Cap. 68:02, as amended by Act 6 of 2006), whose neighbouring-rights Part protects only performers, producers of sound recordings, and broadcasting organisations, not print or online news publishers, so there is no publisher-side neighbouring right of the kind the European Union's Digital Single Market Directive Article 15 creates.

The Act lets a newspaper or periodical, broadcaster, or other communicator to the public reproduce, without the author's authorisation but subject to naming the author and source, an article on current economic, political, or religious topics published in a newspaper or periodical, or a broadcast work of the same character, provided the right to authorise such reproduction has not been expressly reserved by the author or owner of copyright (section 18(a)); this express-reservation proviso functions as an author-side opt-out mechanism for that specific exception, the closest Botswana law comes to a machine-readable reservation, though it long predates the concept of one and is not framed as machine-readable.

The Act separately permits reproducing, broadcasting, or otherwise communicating short excerpts of a work seen or heard in the course of reporting current events, to the extent justified by the purpose (section 18(b)), and permits quotation of a short part of a published work compatible with fair practice and not exceeding the extent justified by the purpose, provided the source and author are named (section 14).

Neither exception is capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold in the way some jurisdictions' quotation rights are, the section 18(a) exception is not confined to the press industry, and no reported Botswana decision applies either provision to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to a traditional newspaper or broadcaster.

The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists, and no statute or case law addressing whether a hyperlink is itself a communication to the public, or whether framing or inline display changes the answer, exists.

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Botswana has not enacted a binding statute imposing an AI-transparency or output-labeling duty (a duty to disclose that content is AI-generated, to label or watermark synthetic output, or to disclose that a user is talking to a bot).

Its one binding rule on automated decisions is a data-protection right rather than an AI-specific duty: section 49 of the Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024) gives a data subject the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects concerning them or similarly significantly affects them, subject to narrow exceptions (contract necessity, explicit consent, or a specific authorising law) and, where an exception applies, to safeguards including the right to obtain human intervention and to contest the decision.

That right attaches to the processing of personal data and sits with the rest of the Act's data-protection regime, whatever technology makes the decision.

As of 2026, Botswana has no adopted national AI strategy or policy: the Ministry of Communications and Innovation has said publicly that a National Artificial Intelligence Policy is being finalised, following a UNESCO AI Readiness Assessment, but the policy remained unpublished and unadopted through August 2025 and no numbered bill or public draft legal text implementing it is publicly available.

Botswana's existing binding statutes touching AI-adjacent activity address other duties: the Cybercrime and Computer Related Crimes Act, 2018 criminalizes computer-misuse conduct that could be carried out with AI tooling but imposes no AI-specific duty, and the Data Protection Act's data protection impact assessment requirement (Part XII) would reach an automated-decision system that presents high risk to a data subject's rights, but this is a general data-protection process duty rather than an AI-specific one.

As of .

Age gating law

Botswana has not enacted an adult-content age-verification, social-media minor-access, app-store age-verification, or age-appropriate design code statute.

The Children's Act, 2009 (Act No. 8 of 2009) defines a child as any person below the age of eighteen years and bars exposing a child to pornographic material, making such material available to a child, or involving a child in the making of such material (section 58), and separately bars storing, keeping, or distributing an indecent image depicting illegal sexual activity against a child (section 58(2)); these are content and offender-focused criminal offences rather than an age-verification or age-gating duty imposed on an online service, and none of them requires a service to verify a user's age before granting access.

The Cybercrime and Computer Related Crimes Act, 2018 separately criminalizes publishing, producing, possessing, or accessing child pornography or obscene material relating to children through a computer or computer system, and communicating with a person under eighteen for the purpose of facilitating a child-pornography, prostitution, rape, or indecent-assault offence, or with a person under sixteen for the purpose of facilitating abduction, kidnapping, or a sexual offence (section 19); these too are content and offender-focused criminal offences, not an age-verification duty.

Separately, the Data Protection Act, 2024 requires a child's own consent from age sixteen, or otherwise a parent's or guardian's consent, before processing the child's personal data in connection with an information-society service offered directly to them (section 29), but that is a data-protection consent safeguard the Data Protection Act creates, rather than an age-verification duty on a service.

No numbered bill, Government Gazette citation, or public draft text proposing an age-verification, social-media minor-access, app-store age-verification, or age-appropriate design regime is cited here.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Botswana AI law
  • No current case law for Botswana privacy law
  • No current case law for Botswana scraping law
  • No current case law for Botswana cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Botswana communications law
  • No current case law for Botswana content moderation law
  • No current case law for Botswana product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Botswana digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Botswana age gating law
  • No current case law for Botswana reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here2 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Botswana comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

8 hours
Incident notificationsecurity law
72 hours
Breach notificationprivacy law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Botswana

8 hours

Cybersecurity Act, Reporting of Cybersecurity Incidents

Cybersecurity Act, 2025 (Act No. 21 of 2025), s. 53security law, enacted, not yet in force

The sentences the clocks are read from

Immediately notify the Botswana Computer Security Incident Response Team, in the manner it determines, of a perceived or actual cybersecurity incident in respect of the critical information or critical national information infrastructure, or in respect of any computer system under your control that is interconnected or communicates with it (section 53(1)).

Submit a preliminary cybersecurity incident report to the Team immediately after the incident is detected and within not more than eight hours of notifying it, in the manner and form prescribed (section 53(2)).

72 hours

Data Protection Act, 2024, personal data breach notification

Data Protection Act, 2024 (Act No. 18 of 2024), ss. 63-64privacy law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Notify the Information and Data Protection Commission of a personal-data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of it, unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to the affected person's rights and freedoms, and give reasons for any later notification.

As a data processor, notify the data controller of a personal-data breach without undue delay after becoming aware of it.

Communicate a high-risk personal-data breach to the affected data subject without undue delay.

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.