Law / Antigua and Barbuda

Antigua and Barbuda

13 of 14 named instruments researched to a stage, across four of the ten areas of law we track: 11 in force and 2 not yet in force. As of .

  1. AI law
  2. Privacy law 4
  3. Scraping law 2
  4. Cybersecurity law 6
  5. Communications law not researched
  6. Content moderation law not researched
  7. Product and AI liability law not researched
  8. Digital accessibility law not researched
  9. Age gating law
  10. Reuse law 1

in forcenot yet in forceblocked by a courtproposedno longer in force

Privacy law4 instruments, 4 in force

Research summary (170 words)

Antigua and Barbuda's Data Protection Act, 2013 (No. 10 of 2013) is the jurisdiction's only general personal-data statute, and its coverage is narrower than a comprehensive, sector-neutral regime: the Act defines protected personal data as information "in respect of commercial transactions", so a data user's duties under the Act attach only to personal data arising from a transaction of a commercial nature.

The Act sets consent, notice, disclosure, security, retention, data-integrity and access principles binding both public and private bodies, gives a data subject rights of access and rectification, but no right of erasure or portability, and imposes heightened consent conditions on sensitive personal data, but its text carries no breach-notification duty, no cross-border-transfer restriction, and no general carve-out for personal data that is publicly available.

Enforcement functions are assigned to the Information Commissioner appointed under the Freedom of Information Act 2004, a contravention is a criminal offence carrying escalating fines and imprisonment, and the Act does not arm a data subject with an independent private right of civil action.

Comprehensive regime

Data Protection Act, 2013

Data Protection Act, 2013 (No. 10 of 2013), ss. 5, 7-10, 17, 19-20Official Gazette text of the Data Protection Act, 2013, Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 5 requires a data user to obtain a data subject's consent before processing personal data other than sensitive personal data, unless the processing is necessary for a listed alternative ground such as performing a contract, complying with a legal obligation, protecting the data subject's vital interests, the administration of justice, or exercising a function conferred by law, and requires every such processing to be for a lawful purpose directly related to the data user's activity, necessary for that purpose, and adequate but not excessive.

Section 7 bars disclosing personal data for a purpose other than the one notified at collection, or a purpose directly related to it, without the data subject's consent, subject to the exceptions in section 17.

Section 17 lets a data user disclose personal data for a different purpose where the data subject consents, the disclosure prevents or detects crime or is required or authorized by law or a court order, the data user reasonably believed it had the right to disclose or would have had the data subject's consent, or the Minister determines the disclosure is justified in the public interest.

Section 8 requires a data user to take practical security steps against loss, misuse, unauthorized or accidental access, disclosure, alteration or destruction of personal data, having regard to its sensitivity, where it is stored, the security measures built into that storage, and the reliability of personnel with access, and requires the same guarantees from a data processor engaged on the data user's behalf.

Section 9 bars keeping personal data longer than necessary for the purpose it was processed for. Section 10 requires a data user to keep personal data accurate, complete, not misleading and up to date, having regard to the purpose it was collected and further processed for.

Section 19 exempts personal data processed for an individual's personal, family or household affairs entirely, and exempts data processed for crime prevention or investigation, apprehension or prosecution of offenders, or tax assessment and collection, for preparing statistics or conducting research, for a court order or judgment, or for discharging regulatory functions, from the General, Notice and Choice, Disclosure and Access Principles, and exempts data processed only for journalistic, literary or artistic purposes from those principles plus the Retention and Data Integrity Principles, where publication would be in the public interest.

Section 20 lets the Minister, on the Information Commissioner's recommendation, exempt a data user or class of data users from any or all of the Act's principles by Order published in the Gazette. The Act states no commencement date of its own. Under section 5(1) of the Statutes Act, a statute not expressed to come into operation on a particular day comes into operation on the day it is published in the Gazette.

The Act received the Governor-General's assent on and was published in the Official Gazette (Vol. XXXIII No. 64) on .

What it requires

Data subject rights

Data Protection Act, 2013, notice and rights of data subjects

Data Protection Act, 2013, ss. 6, 11-16 (notice and rights of data subjects)Official Gazette text of the Data Protection Act, 2013, Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 6 requires a data user, on a data subject's request, to disclose the purposes for which their personal data is being or will be collected and processed, any information available about its source, the classes of third parties it may be disclosed to, whether supplying the data is obligatory or voluntary and the consequences of not supplying it, and how to contact the data user with inquiries or complaints.

Section 11 gives a data subject the right to access their personal data held by a data user and to have it corrected where it is inaccurate, incomplete, misleading or not up to date, except where access or correction is refused under this Act.

Section 12 requires a public body or private body, on a person's written request and payment of the prescribed fee, to say whether personal data of which that person is the data subject is being processed and, if so, to communicate the data itself, the purposes of processing, the classes of recipients and the source of the data.

Section 13 requires the body to give written notice within thirty days of the request whether access will be granted and, if so, to give access, subject to an extension of up to thirty further days or a longer period needed to convert the data into an alternative format.

Section 14 lets a body deny access where it lacks information to identify the requester or locate the data, where an exemption or duty of confidentiality applies, where a third party identifiable from the data withholds consent, or where the Information Commissioner approves the refusal in writing, and requires the Chief Executive Officer's refusal notice to state the specific statutory ground and the right to complain to the Information Commissioner.

Section 15 requires the body to let the data subject examine the personal data or give them a copy, in an alternative format where the data subject has a sensory disability and that format already exists or converting to it is reasonable.

Section 16 requires the body, on a data subject's written application specifying the claimed defect and the amendment requested, to correct personal data found to be incomplete, incorrect, misleading, excessive or irrelevant without obliterating the pre-amendment text, or to refuse with written reasons and tell the data subject of the right to complain to the Information Commissioner within twenty-eight days. The Act states no commencement date of its own.

It received the Governor-General's assent on and was published in the Official Gazette (Vol. XXXIII No. 64) on . Under section 5(1) of the Statutes Act, a statute not expressed to come into operation on a particular day comes into operation on the day it is published in the Gazette.

What it requires

Enforcement supervision

Data Protection Act, 2013, information commissioner and enforcement

Data Protection Act, 2013, ss. 21-27 (information commissioner and enforcement)Official Gazette text of the Data Protection Act, 2013, Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 21 assigns the Information Commissioner appointed under the Freedom of Information Act 2004 the powers, functions and duties needed to enforce this Act. Section 22 makes it an offence for a person to intentionally disclose another person's personal information in contravention of this Act, or to collect, store or dispose of personal information in a manner that contravenes it.

Section 18(3) separately makes contravening the sensitive personal data conditions in section 18(1) an offence carrying a fine of up to two hundred thousand dollars or imprisonment of up to three years, or both.

Section 23 makes a contravention of this Act for which no other penalty is specified an offence carrying, for an individual, a fine of up to fifty thousand dollars or imprisonment of up to three years on summary conviction, or a fine of up to one hundred thousand dollars or imprisonment of up to five years on conviction on indictment, and for a body corporate, a fine of up to two hundred thousand dollars on summary conviction or five hundred thousand dollars on indictment.

Section 24 gives a right of appeal to the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court against a requirement in an enforcement notice or an information notice, against a decision of the Information Commissioner on a complaint, or against any decision of the Information Commissioner in the conduct of duties and powers under this Act.

Section 25 bars criminal or civil proceedings against the Information Commissioner, or a person acting on the Commissioner's behalf, for anything done in good faith in exercising a power, duty or function under this Act, and gives absolute privilege to words spoken and reports made in good faith in that exercise.

Section 26 bars the Information Commissioner and anyone acting on the Commissioner's behalf from disclosing information that comes to their knowledge in the conduct of their functions under this Act. Section 27 requires the Information Commissioner to include a report on data protection activities under this Act in the annual report made to Parliament under the Freedom of Information Act 2004. The Act does not arm a data subject with an independent private right of civil action.

The Act states no commencement date of its own. It received the Governor-General's assent on and was published in the Official Gazette (Vol. XXXIII No. 64) on . Under section 5(1) of the Statutes Act, a statute not expressed to come into operation on a particular day comes into operation on the day it is published in the Gazette.

What it requires

Sensitive categories

Data Protection Act, 2013, sensitive personal data

Data Protection Act, 2013, s. 18 (sensitive personal data)Official Gazette text of the Data Protection Act, 2013, Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda

In force since . Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 18(1) bars a data user from processing sensitive personal data, meaning information about a data subject's physical or mental health or condition, sexual orientation, political opinions, religious or similar beliefs, or the commission or alleged commission of an offence, except where the data subject has given explicit consent to the processing.

Section 18(1)(b) lists the alternative grounds on which sensitive personal data may be processed without consent, including exercising or performing an employment law right or obligation, protecting the vital interests of the data subject or another person where consent cannot be given or reasonably obtained, medical treatment by a healthcare professional or a person under an equivalent duty of confidentiality, legal proceedings or obtaining legal advice, establishing, exercising or defending legal rights, the administration of justice, or exercising a function conferred by written law.

Section 18(1)(c) also permits processing sensitive personal data that the data subject has already made public through their own deliberate action. Section 18(2) lets the Minister, by Order published in the Gazette, exclude some of those grounds in specified cases or make them subject to further conditions. The Act states no commencement date of its own. It received the Governor-General's assent on and was published in the Official Gazette (Vol. XXXIII No. 64) on .

Under section 5(1) of the Statutes Act, a statute not expressed to come into operation on a particular day comes into operation on the day it is published in the Gazette.

What it requires

Scraping law2 instruments, 2 in force

Research summary (295 words)

Antigua and Barbuda has no scraping-specific statute, so general law governs each dimension separately.

The Electronic Crimes Act, 2013 prohibits intentionally accessing, or downloading, copying or extracting data from, an electronic system or network "without lawful excuse or justification", a broader trigger than a security-circumvention test; a genuinely public, unauthenticated page is very likely accessed with a lawful excuse on a plain reading, but no reported Antiguan case tests the point either way, and the Act separately criminalises disabling or accessing a "sensitive electronic system" (one used for security, defence, confidential law-enforcement sources, or essential services) as an indictable offence.

No Antiguan or Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court decision was located on the enforceability of a browsewrap or clickwrap terms-of-service against a scraper.

The Copyright Act, 2003 permits fair dealing for research or private study, criticism or review, and reporting current events with sufficient acknowledgement, but Antigua has not enacted a text-and-data-mining exception, so training a model on scraped copyrighted text rests only on the general fair-dealing ground if it can be characterised as research; the same Act protects a compilation of data as a literary work only where its selection or arrangement is the author's own intellectual creation, and confers no separate sui generis database right.

The Data Protection Act, 2013 covers only personal data arising "in respect of commercial transactions" and carries no exemption for publicly available data, so scraping personal data tied to a commercial transaction of an Antiguan data subject remains subject to the Act's consent, notice and security duties, while personal data outside a commercial-transaction context sits outside the Act's own definition altogether.

No Antiguan statute or reported case establishes a scraping-specific unfair-competition, misappropriation or trespass doctrine, and none assigns legal weight to a robots.txt directive or imposes an AI-training-specific rule.

Computer misuse

Electronic Crimes Act, 2013, access and interference

Electronic Crimes Act, 2013 (No. 14 of 2013), s. 3Official Gazette text of the Electronic Crimes Act, 2013, Government Printing Office, Antigua and Barbuda

In force. Binds public and private bodies.

What this law does

Section 3(1) prohibits a person from intentionally, without lawful excuse or justification, accessing an electronic system or network, downloading, copying or extracting data or an electronic database from it, introducing a contaminant or malicious code, damaging or disrupting the system, denying an authorised person access to it, or destroying or altering source code with intent to cause damage.

The trigger is the absence of a "lawful excuse or justification" for the access, rather than a requirement to infringe a security measure, so the provision reads on its face more broadly than a statute limited to defeating an access control; a service that publishes a page for open, unauthenticated public access would ordinarily give a visitor a lawful excuse to access and copy it.

The offence carries a fine of up to two hundred thousand dollars or imprisonment of up to three years, or both, on summary conviction, or a fine of up to five hundred thousand dollars or imprisonment of up to seven years, or both, on conviction on indictment. The Act states no commencement date of its own. It received the Governor-General's assent on and was published in the Official Gazette (Vol. XXXIII No. 65) on , and no commencement notice has been located.

What it requires

Cybersecurity law6 instruments, 4 in force, 2 not yet in force

Research summary (685 words)

Antigua and Barbuda has no standalone statute setting security requirements a software product or connected device must meet before or after it reaches the market, no vulnerability or incident-reporting duty running from a manufacturer or platform operator to an authority or to users, no sector cyber-resilience regime naming a digital service, and no general reasonable-security or information-security-programme statute binding a business simply because it holds covered information.

The Electronic Crimes Act, 2013 (No. 14 of 2013) criminalises intentionally accessing, or downloading, copying or extracting data from, an electronic system or network without lawful excuse, and separately makes disabling or accessing a sensitive electronic system (one used for security, defence, confidential law-enforcement sources, or essential services) an indictable offence; both provisions bind the intruder rather than the operator or manufacturer, so they stay with this corpus's computer-misuse family rather than this topic.

The Data Protection Act, 2013 (No. 10 of 2013) requires a data user to take practical steps against loss, misuse or unauthorised access to personal data arising from a commercial transaction, a security-of-processing article inside that comprehensive, consent-based regime rather than a standalone security statute, so it is that row's finding and is not repeated here.

The Telecommunications Act, Cap. 423, and its 2018 amendment (No. 31 of 2018), which replaced the Telecommunications Authority's governance structure and added numbering, number-portability and electronic-address provisions, carry no cybersecurity, network-security or critical-infrastructure duty on a telecommunications or digital-service provider.

Two sector regimes reach a class of entity, licensed financial institutions, and are filed as rows of their own, as are the Digital Assets Business Act 2020's cyber-event reporting and offering-security duties.

The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, the regional monetary authority for the currency union to which Antigua and Barbuda belongs, issued Banking Prudential Standard No. 3 of 2022 under section 184 of the Banking Act, binding every institution licensed under that Act; it requires a security control process against internal and external threats, a written e-banking incident response plan, and, once a security breach or disruptive incident occurs, a report to the Central Bank within three days of the occurrence, with an institution found in violation subject to remedial action under section 75 of the Banking Act.

The Financial Services Regulatory Commission, which separately regulates Antigua and Barbuda's international banks and trust corporations, issued its own Guidelines on Electronic Banking (numbered G11 in the Commission's guideline series) imposing parallel security-control, incident-logging and supervisory-reporting duties on the institutions it licenses, verified during onsite examination; the copy located is a 2015-dated capture and current availability at the Commission's own site was not confirmed.

Neither regime arms a private plaintiff; each runs through its own regulator's supervisory and remedial powers. In Antigua and Barbuda, the Prudential Standard for Electronic Banking of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank requires an institution licensed under the Banking Act to implement a comprehensive security process for its e-banking systems.

In Antigua and Barbuda, the Prudential Standard for Electronic Banking of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank requires an institution licensed under the Banking Act to send all incident reports and its response to the Central Bank within 3 days of the occurrence.

In Antigua and Barbuda, the Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank says the Board of an institution licensed under the Banking Act is ultimately responsible for effective oversight of all IT and cybersecurity risks, systems and processes.

In Antigua and Barbuda, the Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management of the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank provides that an institution licensed under the Banking Act shall alert the ECCB within 24 hours of becoming aware of a cyber-incident.

In Antigua and Barbuda, section 23 of the Digital Assets Business Act 2020 requires a compliance officer to notify the Office of National Drug and Money Laundering Control Policy forthwith of an event to which the section applies, which includes a cyber reporting event.

In Antigua and Barbuda, paragraph 12(2) of Schedule I to the Digital Assets Business Act 2020 requires a licensee to ensure appropriate mechanisms are in place for the security of digital assets issued to recipients in an Offering.

Sector security regimes

Antigua and Barbuda Digital Assets Business Act 2020, Security of an Initial Digital Asset Offering

Digital Assets Business Act, 2020 (No. 16 of 2020), Sch. I, para. 12Text of the Digital Assets Business Act, 2020 (No. 16 of 2020) as published by the Financial Services Regulatory Commission

Not yet in force

Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Paragraph 12(2) of Schedule I to the Act provides that the licensee shall ensure that appropriate mechanisms are in place in respect of the security of digital assets issued to recipients, confidentiality, disclosure of information and connected matters. Paragraph 12(1) of Schedule I requires a licensee to carry out an internal compliance review with respect to the conduct of an Offering.

Section 1(2) of the Act provides that it comes into effect on a day to be appointed by the Minister by Notice published in the official Gazette. The Governor-General assented to the Act on .

What it requires

Antigua and Barbuda Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Electronic Banking Standard, Security Controls

Electronic Banking Standard, security controls, Banking Prudential Standard No. 3 of 2022, paras. 5.2 and 6.4Text of the standard as published by the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank issued the Prudential Standard for Electronic Banking in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 184 of the Banking Act. The standard applies to all institutions licensed under the Banking Act. The standard comes into effect on .

Paragraph 5.2.1 of the standard requires a licensed financial institution to ensure that the necessary security control infrastructure is in place to secure e-banking systems and data from both internal and external threats. Paragraph 5.2.2 of the standard requires a comprehensive security process, inclusive of policies and procedures that address possible internal and external security threats in terms of incident prevention and the appropriate response.

Paragraph 6.4 of the standard requires the security process implemented by the institution to be submitted to the Central Bank. The standard states that institutions found in violation of it are subject to remedial actions specified in section 75 of the Banking Act.

What it requires

Antigua and Barbuda Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Technology Risk Management Standard, Cyber-Risk Governance

Technology Risk Standard cyber governance, Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management, paras. 5.2.4 and Board and Senior Management rolesText of the standard as published by the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank issued the Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 184 of the Banking Act, 2015. The standard comes into effect on . The standard says it should be applied by all regulated licensed financial institutions, Financial Groups and Conglomerates, unless IT is not a significant function or alternative measures of equal effect have been taken.

The standard says the Board of an institution is ultimately responsible for effective oversight of all IT and cybersecurity risks, systems and processes. The standard says that any deviation from it must be explained in a separate document, to be made promptly available to the ECCB on request. The standard says an institution that relies heavily on its IT systems for daily operations should establish a cybersecurity policy based on its risk assessment.

Section 184(3) of the Banking Act 2015 of Antigua and Barbuda, inserted by the Banking (Amendment) Act 2025, provides that prudential standards issued by the Central Bank shall have the force of law.

What it requires

Vulnerability and incident reporting

Antigua and Barbuda Digital Assets Business Act 2020, Compliance Officer Report of a Cyber Reporting Event

Digital Assets Business Act, 2020 (No. 16 of 2020), ss. 2(1) and 23Text of the Digital Assets Business Act, 2020 (No. 16 of 2020) as published by the Financial Services Regulatory Commission

Not yet in force

Binds private bodies.

What this law does

Section 23(1)(b) of the Act requires a compliance officer of a licensed undertaking to notify the Office of National Drug and Money Laundering Control Policy forthwith, in such manner as it may direct, on its coming to his knowledge, or his having reason to believe, that an event to which the section applies has occurred. Section 23(3)(f) of the Act makes a cyber reporting event one of the events to which section 23 applies.

Section 23(2) of the Act requires the compliance officer, within 14 days of that notification, to furnish the Commission with a report in writing setting out all the particulars of the case that are available to him. Section 2(1) of the Act defines a cyber reporting event as any act that results in unauthorized access to, disruption, or misuse of the electronic systems or information stored on such systems of a licensed undertaking.

Section 1(2) of the Act provides that it comes into effect on a day to be appointed by the Minister by Notice published in the official Gazette. The Governor-General assented to the Act on .

What it requires

Antigua and Barbuda Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Electronic Banking Standard, Incident Reporting

Electronic Banking Standard, incident reporting, Banking Prudential Standard No. 3 of 2022, paras. 5.2.7, 5.11 and 6.4Text of the standard as published by the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank issued the Prudential Standard for Electronic Banking in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 184 of the Banking Act. Paragraph 6.4 of the standard requires all incident reports and the response to be sent to the Central Bank within 3 days of the occurrence. Paragraph 6.4 of the standard also requires any further update on the incident to be reported to the Central Bank.

Paragraph 5.2.7 of the standard requires formal incident response and management procedures for timely reporting and handling of suspected or actual security breaches, fraud, or service interruptions of e-banking services. Paragraph 5.11.2 of the standard requires an incident response plan to include a clear process for alerting the appropriate regulatory authorities in the event of security breaches or disruptive incidents.

The standard states that institutions found in violation of it are subject to remedial actions specified in section 75 of the Banking Act.

What it requires

Antigua and Barbuda Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Technology Risk Management Standard, Cyber-Incident Reporting

Technology Risk Standard, cyber incidents, Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management, para. 12.8.1 and Appendix IText of the standard as published by the Eastern Caribbean Central Bank

In force since . Binds private bodies.

What this law does

The Eastern Caribbean Central Bank issued the Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 184 of the Banking Act, 2015. Paragraph 12.8.1 of the standard provides that within 24 hours of becoming aware of a cyber-incident, an institution shall alert the ECCB and its Information Security User Group that a cyber-incident occurred.

Paragraph 12.8.1 of the standard also says the compromised institution should complete the incident report in Appendix I and submit it to the ECCB within 48 hours of the incident. The standard lists among the responsibilities of Senior Management notifying directly the customers whose accounts were potentially or actually compromised within seventy-two hours of the discovery of the incident.

The standard lists among the responsibilities of Senior Management notifying the general public about a cybersecurity incident only after notifying the ECCB. Paragraph 12.8.4 of the standard provides that an institution shall provide an update on the incident to the ECCB at a frequency determined by the ECCB. Paragraph 12.8.5 of the standard provides that following the resolution of the cyber-incident an institution shall conduct a post-incident review and submit it to the ECCB.

Section 184(3) of the Banking Act 2015 of Antigua and Barbuda, inserted by the Banking (Amendment) Act 2025, provides that prudential standards issued by the Central Bank shall have the force of law.

What it requires

Reuse law1 instrument, 1 in force

Research summary (227 words)

Antigua and Barbuda has no press-publisher neighbouring right, no mandatory platform-to-publisher bargaining code, no recognised hot-news misappropriation doctrine distinct from ordinary copyright law, and no located statute or case law addressing hyperlinking or framing liability specifically; each of those dimensions is a sourced absence rather than an unresolved question.

The relevant instrument is the Copyright Act, 2003 (No. 22 of 2003), which excludes an idea, concept, process, or mere data from copyright protection outright, so a bare fact is never a protected work regardless of who first reported it, and protects a compilation of data (a database) only as a literary work turning on originality in selection or arrangement, with no separate sui generis database right.

Sections 52 to 54 let a person, once a work is lawfully disclosed, fairly deal with it for the purposes of criticism or review, or (other than a photograph) for reporting current events, without infringing copyright, so long as the use is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement; the exception is not capped at a headline-length or short-extract threshold and is not confined to the press industry, and no reported Antiguan or Eastern Caribbean decision was located applying it to a systematic news aggregator as opposed to an individual critic or reporter.

The Act predates the concept of a machine-readable text-and-data-mining reservation entirely, so no opt-out mechanism of that kind exists either.

Where nothing was found2 areas of law

These areas of law were researched here and no instrument was recorded. Each finding says what the research checked, as of the date under it. It describes our search, not a guarantee that no such law exists.

AI law

Antigua and Barbuda has no AI-transparency, AI-risk-obligations, training-data, prohibited-practices, governance, or sector-specific AI statute.

The Electronic Crimes Act, 2013 (No. 14 of 2013) and the Data Protection Act, 2013 (No. 10 of 2013), the two general technology statutes checked for this topic, address unauthorised computer access, electronic offences, and personal data processed in commercial transactions respectively; neither imposes a disclosure, labelling, or output-transparency duty tied to an AI system or an automated-decision process, and neither names artificial intelligence, an algorithm, or automated decision-making at all.

As of .

Age gating law

Antigua and Barbuda has no adult-content age-verification law, social-media minor-access restriction, app-store age-verification requirement, or age-appropriate design code. The Electronic Crimes Act, 2013 (No. 14 of 2013) criminalizes publishing, transmitting, or procuring child pornography and facilitating the abuse of a child online under section 10, but that section punishes the underlying conduct rather than imposing an age-verification or age-gating duty on a service provider. The Data Protection Act, 2013 (No. 10 of 2013) contains no age-specific provision at all.

As of .

Case law

  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda AI law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda privacy law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda scraping law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda cybersecurity law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda communications law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda content moderation law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda product and AI liability law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda digital accessibility law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda age gating law
  • No current case law for Antigua and Barbuda reuse law

Reporting clocks that run here3 instruments

The instruments whose obligation lines set a deadline for reporting an incident, a vulnerability or a personal-data breach, each deadline read from the sentence that carries it and listed shortest first. The law of Antigua and Barbuda comes first, then the law of the bodies above it that applies here.

Each flag is one law, and a link to it. Read down the scale: the clocks document's time axis, with the empty stretches shortened so the deadlines sit close. Flags on one line set the same duty at the same deadline, and the laws behind them are named to the right, with what each clock counts from.

1 day
Incident notificationsecurity law
48 hours
14 days
Incident notificationsecurity law
The deadlines above on one time axis, shortest at the top. The axis keeps its order and, between neighbors, its proportion, but a stretch with no deadline on it is shortened, so the hour marks on the left are what say how far apart two stations really are. Beside each action, the laws that set it, what each counts from, and a status where the law is not yet in force. The List tab has the same data in full, with the sentences.

The law of Antigua and Barbuda

1 day14 days

Antigua and Barbuda Digital Assets Business Act 2020, Compliance Officer Report of a Cyber Reporting Event

Digital Assets Business Act, 2020 (No. 16 of 2020), ss. 2(1) and 23security law, enacted, not yet in force

The sentences the clocks are read from

This Act has been enacted and comes into effect on a day to be appointed by the Minister by Notice published in the official Gazette (section 1(2)), and no commencement notice has been located. When it is in effect it binds a licensed undertaking carrying on digital asset business in or from within Antigua and Barbuda, through its compliance officer (reached by declaring that you are a crypto-asset provider).

Have your compliance officer notify the Office of National Drug and Money Laundering Control Policy forthwith, in the manner it directs, on coming to know of, or having reason to believe in, a cyber reporting event, meaning any act that results in unauthorized access to, disruption, or misuse of your electronic systems or the information stored on them (section 23(1)(b) and (3)(f), section 2(1)).

Within 14 days of that notification, have your compliance officer furnish the Commission with a report in writing setting out all the particulars of the case that are available to him (section 23(2)).

24 hours48 hours72 hours

Antigua and Barbuda Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Technology Risk Management Standard, Cyber-Incident Reporting

Technology Risk Standard, cyber incidents, Prudential Standard on Technology Risk Management, para. 12.8.1 and Appendix Isecurity law, in force since

The sentences the clocks are read from

Within 24 hours of becoming aware of a cyber-incident, alert the ECCB and the Information Security User Group of licensed financial institutions that a cyber-incident occurred (paragraph 12.8.1).

Complete the incident report in Appendix I of the standard and submit it to the ECCB within 48 hours of the incident; the standard states this as 'should' (paragraph 12.8.1 and Appendix I).

Notify directly the customers whose accounts were potentially or actually compromised within seventy-two hours of the discovery of the incident (Senior Management roles, item g).

Which of these one incident starts turns on the facts: the incident method works that through. The clocks document draws every clock in the LexLint law library on one axis, with the sentence beside every rung.

Drafted with AI

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page. How this site is made

This page covers the instruments LexLint has researched to a stage. Instruments named in the law library but not yet researched are counted in the head and are not listed here. Every entry carries its own primary source on its note page. This is a research index, not legal advice.