Law / United States / Oregon

Civic Information Act, platform payment for digital journalism (SB 686)

Or. Senate Bill 686, 2025 Regular Session (B-Engrossed)

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

Withdrawn: no longer proceeding.

A news media bargaining code rule binding private bodies.

As of 6 September 2026.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Would have barred a covered platform from accessing the online content of a digital journalism provider for an Oregon audience without a qualifying compensation agreement. A covered platform had to have at least 50 million monthly active users or subscribers in the United States. It also had to be owned or controlled by a parent corporation whose United States revenue or market capitalization is above $550 billion.

A digital journalism provider could sue for the greater of actual or statutory damages of $1,000 per unauthorized access plus punitive damages, unless the platform was complying with arbitration; a platform or group of providers could instead initiate arbitration to set a percentage of the platform's advertising revenue to be remitted annually. The bill also created the Oregon Civic Information Consortium to award journalism grants.

The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Rules and remained located in a Senate committee with no chapter number assigned when the 2025 regular session concluded, so it did not become law.

What it reaches

Instrument type

a bill introduced in a legislature

Categories

Bargaining code

When LexLint raises it

  • aggregates_content

Read the law

Oregon Legislative Information System, bill overview for Senate Bill 686 (2025 Regular Session)

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app