Law / United States / 
Colorado
SB 24-205 (2024), Colorado AI Act, original enactment
C.R.S. 6-1-1701 et seq., as originally enacted
An AI transparency rule binding private bodies.
- Audit expectation
- none
What it requires
- Repealed before it reached its own operative date, so read this as context rather than a live duty
- As enacted, a deployer or developer that made an artificial intelligence system available to interact with consumers had to ensure the consumer was told they were interacting with artificial intelligence, unless that would already be obvious to a reasonable person
- Its successor framework is SB 26-189, effective
These lines are LexLint's reading of the law's text.
Who enforces it
Settledness
The United States intervened on in X.AI LLC v. Weiser, No. 1:26-cv-01515 (D. Colo.), seeking a declaration that SB24-205 is unconstitutional and an injunction against its enforcement.
- As of
- Under challenge
- Yes
What this law does
As originally enacted, this disclosure duty (6-1-1704) required a deployer or developer that made an artificial intelligence system available to interact with consumers to ensure disclosure to each consumer that they were interacting with an artificial intelligence system, unless it would be obvious to a reasonable person, and sat alongside a broader high-risk-system duty to avoid algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions elsewhere in Part 17, outside this topic's scope.
The operative date slipped twice: first to as originally enacted, then to under SB 25B-004 (2025 Special Session B, Chapter 3), which extended the effective date of SB 24-205's requirements and added no independent disclosure duty of its own; enforcement was then stayed by a federal court on in X.AI LLC v. Weiser (a stipulated stay on joint motion of xAI and the state, not a merits ruling) after xAI sued and the United States intervened.
Before the delayed date arrived, SB 26-189 (signed ) repealed and re-enacted the same Part 17 with a successor framework, effective ; the Colorado General Assembly's own bill summary describes this action as repealing and reenacting Part 17, and multiple law firm summaries of the signed act likewise describe SB 24-205 as repealed.
Because it never reached its own operative date before being repealed, this statute was never in force at any point, and is recorded here as repealed.
When LexLint raises it
When your app profile says your app makes high-risk automated decisions.
Back to the example · Lint your app
Page updated .