R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police, Automated Facial Recognition by Police

R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 11 August 2020.

A sensitive categories rule binding government bodies.

As of 24 August 2026.

What it requires

If you are a public authority deploying facial recognition or another biometric surveillance system in the United Kingdom, put an adequate legal framework and a proper Data Protection Impact Assessment in place before deployment, not after.

Who checks it

Audit expectation

none

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

The Court of Appeal held South Wales Police's automated facial recognition trials unlawful, for breach of Article 8 ECHR, the Data Protection Acts 1998 and 2018 (no adequate legal framework, no proper Data Protection Impact Assessment), and the public-sector equality duty.

This is a public-authority case: it establishes that biometric surveillance deployment needs a proper legal framework, not just a lawful basis, and it is recorded here as applying to government even though the underlying UK GDPR and DPA 2018 biometric rules apply to both public and private actors.

When LexLint raises it

processes_biometrics
high_risk_decisions

Read the law

Court of Appeal (Civil Division) judgment, published by the Judicial Office

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example · Lint your app