Law / European Union

Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening

Case C-5/08, judgment of 16 July 2009

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

Decided 16 July 2009 by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

A snippet reproduction rule binding public and private bodies.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

The CJEU (Fourth Chamber) held that an 11-word extract from a newspaper article can be protected by copyright under Art. 2 of the InfoSoc Directive if it reflects the author's own intellectual creation, the standard that now governs all snippet reproduction across EU member states. The Court also found that Infopaq's media-monitoring data-capture process did not qualify for the transient-copy exemption (Art. 5(1)) because the printing step was not transient. This ruling is the foundational EU authority on the copyright status of news snippets used by aggregators.

What it reaches

Instrument type

a court decision

Categories

Snippet reproduction

Also on the record

EEA status

Reason
Case law
Status
Not incorporated

When LexLint raises it

  • aggregates_content

Read the law

EUR-Lex / CURIA

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app