Law / Armenia

Law on Protection of Personal Data, biometric data provisions

Law of the Republic of Armenia on Protection of Personal Data, Law No. HO-49-N, Arts. 3(13), 13, 19(4), 19(6), 23(3)

A citation is an address, not a summary. The first part names the law; what follows narrows it to the exact section, article or paragraph.

What follows is LexLint's own research summary of this law, not legal advice.

In force since 1 July 2015.

A biometric privacy rule binding public and private bodies.

As of 29 August 2026.

What it requires

  • An app that captures or stores a voiceprint, faceprint, or other biometric identifier from a person in Armenia must obtain the data subject's consent, unless a law-defined purpose can only be achieved through that processing, and must notify the authorized body before beginning to process biometric data, since Armenia's biometric-data definition does not distinguish by modality or by whether the identifier was derived from a recording.

What this law does

Drafted with AI from the cited sources under the direction of UnGovr staff. UnGovr holds editorial responsibility for this page.

Art. 3(13) defines biometric personal data only as information characterizing a person's physical, physiological and biological characteristics, a bare, generic definition with no processing-method qualifier, no unique-identification qualifier, and no named modality such as voice or face.

Art. 13 requires the data subject's consent as the default basis for processing biometric data, except where a law-defined purpose can only be achieved through that processing; no modality-specific variation exists.

Art. 19(4) and (6) defer retention and destruction specifics to a separate government resolution, not covered here, requiring only that physical-media storage of biometric data outside information systems be protected from unauthorized access, use, destruction, alteration, blocking, copying, and distribution. Art. 23(3) additionally requires the processor to notify the authorized body before processing biometric or special-category data of its intent to do so, a pre-processing notification duty.

Because the Art. 3(13) definition has no derivation or identification qualifier at all, whether it includes or excludes an identifier derived from a photo, video, or audio recording is not addressed by the statute's text.

When LexLint raises it

  • processes_biometrics
  • processes_voice

Read the law

official primary text, Armenian Legal Information System (ARLIS), translated by the researcher

Every line above is drawn from the primary source linked here, read on the date shown. This is a research summary, not legal advice.

Back to the example  ·  Lint your app